Two things particularly struck me about this incident.
First, I had no idea that there was such a strength of feeling in our country. To hear such vehment allegations claiming that our troops were involved in atrocities shocked me. Yes, very much a minority view but powerful enough to provoke demonstrations. That needs addressing – but how?
Second, I fear for the backlash. Kev is right, the majority of Muslims are, like you and me, living quiet, respectable lives but extremists who will condemn this demonstration will lash out at at easy targets. I so want to be wrong but I feel this small group has done a lot of damage to the relationships between parts of our community in the UK.
Oooh, that’s not at all nice. The team there had more than enough work to do with their restoration without this happening.
There is one positive though – it is hard to tell from Alan’s photos but it does look as if the rear fuselage has survived the drop. At least two RAF Sunderlands were written off in service after dropping off their tail trolleys. There is a photo of one here
If Queenie’s tail section is still OK, then hopefully she can be put back right again soon. Ultimately, it would be good to see her indoors.
Good luck guys
Interesting find. The FN7 mid upper turret was fitted to the MkIII (and some MKII) Sunderlands (and other aircraft). Part of the reason they are so rare is that post war Sunderlands (such as the MkV which equiped 35 Squadron in South Africa) did not have the turret.
The egg shape that Cees refered to looks like this:

A different engine perhaps?
Ah yes, it was. A Napier Lion V of 405 hp only – and it’s on floats. The UK service Ripons apparently had different engines to the Finnish examples. There is probably more similarity to the Blackburn Baffin which had the Pegasus engine (not sure which mark) and served in the UK Fleet Air Arm before being sold to New Zealand. We’ve not found the flight test reports for the Baffin yet.
Ideas welcome.

Sounds good Mark,
And by flagging up that it is a photo rich thread in that way, those still on dial up or other slow connections can be forewarned that it might be too much bandwidth for them.
Martti,
Are these any use? They show the speed tests with and without a torpedo loaded.
They are copied from the files at the National Archives in the UK. I’ve got most of the file – PM me your address and I can post a CD with all the details.
With torpedo
Without torpedo
Over here: http://forum.planetalk.net/viewtopic.php?t=7568 there is a thread looking for info on the Baffin/Ripon’s ability to do aerobatics. If there is anything in the Finnish reports, Dave would love to hear from you.
Allan
Does anyone have operating information – in particular in relation to launching – about the various sport water gliders that have been mentioned in the course of this thread?
It would be very interesting. Unfortunately, when I was researching the Windermere glider, the people who flew the aircraft were no longer with us and I had to rely on information from their families and those involved in converting the glider. So, we don’t know a great deal about how it operated.
One useful bit of evidence is this article in The Times from 13 Feb 1943,

So, allowing for errors in a press report, it seems there was a winch in the speed boat – possibly a combination of towing and winching? Windermere at that time would have been relatively quiet (no petrol for speed boats) and, of course, there were controls in place to allow Sunderlands from Short Brothers’ factory to be tested.
There was a good length of lake for a long take off run but the rope getting wet was, according to one pilots son, the reason they couldn’t get much height. He told me they couldn’t get a cable but cable fouling on the lake bed would be relevant – the northern basin of the lake is 210 feet at max. I don’t what length of rope they had available.
I use to have an article from the ATC Gaztte in the 1940’s about the Slingsby Falcon.
Dave, if you (or anybody else) could find it then it might contribute to the knowledge we have.
Allan
Conservation of old photos is very specialist so it is worth asking going to a museum local to you and asking for advice.
The museum I worked for helped me a lot and pointed to me a company called Conservation by Design which has a full range of specialist storage. When I was last in the Imperial War Museum photo library I noticed they used Conservation by Design plastic sleeves for photos.
Now that is where you need the right advice. Ordinary plastics are very damaging but the right ones will both allow you to see the photo and protect it for deterioration.
Risks are:
Attack by chemical – put them in an envelope and the acids in the paper will damage them, finger prints are worse.
Attack by light – obviously keep them dark
Damage through handing – you need to put each photo in an individual sleeve so you can handle them without risk.
To keep photos dark I use these boxes (click here for link) and store my original photos in the correct polyester album pages. (The page has a link to the album pages). The polyester sleeves let you see the photos but you only touch the sleeve not the photo.
You might notice that Arrowfile advertise in Aeroplane magazine. Their pages are “archive safe” but notice they do not make claims for their albums. So I do use their pages but in Conservation by Design files. I use their albums for my holiday photos.
It is not cheap, but then the photos are not cheap either and they are part of our history.
As for cleaning + conservation, my curator friends all say do nothing unless you absolutely have to. It the original caption label on the back is coming loose, them don’t take the photo out the sleeve you store it in. Don’t use glue or sticky tape unless you get professional advice on which glues etc are safe. A lot of “repairs” can be done in photoshop once you’ve scanned it.
Enjoy the collection
Allan
Steve, discussing recipes is lasses work. Discussing problems such as heat distribution in the oven and how to get even amounts of air through the mix is engineering which is presumably why the question is on an aviation forum.
Steve, discussing recipes is lasses work. Discussing problems such as heat distribution in the oven and how to get even amounts of air through the mix is engineering which is presumably why the question is on an aviation forum.
There is never a need to be abusive to a stranger. I have tried Robbo’s approach which can be entertaining.
Usually I get dialled by a computer so I get four or five seconds of silence before somebody comes on the line to sell to me so, if I’m busy, I simply put the phone on top of the radio and leave them listening to music until they get bored. One guy got really angry – I could hearing him shouting “Hello, is there anybody there” from across the room.
Laughing makes you feel much better than shouting.
There is never a need to be abusive to a stranger. I have tried Robbo’s approach which can be entertaining.
Usually I get dialled by a computer so I get four or five seconds of silence before somebody comes on the line to sell to me so, if I’m busy, I simply put the phone on top of the radio and leave them listening to music until they get bored. One guy got really angry – I could hearing him shouting “Hello, is there anybody there” from across the room.
Laughing makes you feel much better than shouting.
I haven’t seen that type of operational info for this glider. I’m not sure if it has ever been recorded (formally or otherwise). I did meet one of the workers who was involved in the conversion but the two pilots had died some years before and the stories I’ve heard (including the second hand ones) were more to do with the conversion rather than difficiculties of towing from water.
I have recently seen a contemporary press cutting which states that the glider only made it to 150-200 feet up – but I’m away from my files right now.
probably, I should revive the ‘floatplane gliders’ thread
Rather than drift this thread any further, it might be the best thing – if you do I’ll dig out that cutting and put it up there.
Allan
Not sure about DH but other factories did have Home Guard units based on site, so it is feasible.
An interesting find
Also depends on how you pour the mix into the tins. First one, pours easily, second one, with all the remains from the mixing bowl scraped in will lose a lot of air and go flat.
Half fill both tins and then top up both tins and bake on the same shelf