dark light

Roobarb

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,070 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #795358
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Seems no one captured the Bolingbroke departing to Hawkinge yesterday either…

    I reckon the Paparazzi’s Picket-Hamilton lookout emplacement must have been left unmanned :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #796307
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Red 11 (the two-seat Buchon) just made a very welcome “Hello to Duxford” fly through. Nice to finally get a look and listen to her. Welcome back for the first time since October 1968! I think the Paparazzi were drinking their cocoa at the time…

    in reply to: Kent Battle of Britain Museum acquires a Blenheim #799126
    Roobarb
    Participant

    “Great news! Its a shame that you cant take photos in the museum!”

    I’ve already thought of that and taken mine already when we laid the airframe out for viewing the other week… 😉

    in reply to: Why Does No One Want B25 Bed Sheet Bomber? #801739
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Gutted fuselage, empty cockpit, huge exfoliation issues in the outer wing sections and that was at North Weald over ten years ago. She was a “fair” static when at the Historic Aircraft Museum in Southend up until sold at the auction in 1983, though in the last five years there she had gone down hill and also lost her turret as a mould pattern for Sally B for the LWT series “We”ll meet again” (it was never returned from the film set). After moving to DX now with Aces High she had various film schemes applied before moving to North Weald. Given a cosmetic make-over she became “Bedshoot Bomber” and was entered for auction again. There are a number of stories after this point that involve some vague issues that lingered for years and she ended up slowly sinking into the grass storage area and became derelict. From the little that I’ve seen of her “storage” at Booker, I’d be surprised if the corrosion issues have “improved” at all. A real shame, as had the aircraft found a home with a museum like Newark or Elvington when sold at that Phillips auction at Southend (ok I know Elvington wasn’t going back then but it’s just an example) then I am certain it would have undergone a comprehensive restoration to a high quality static condition and maybe in time would have been fitted out inside. For me growing up in Southend, I saw it have its film nose removed and an authentic bomber nose restored and fitted. All the gun positions had convincing good quality replica gun barrels installed and a nice RAF WWII period scheme had already been applied in one of the airport hangars. I think from memory it got repainted whilst at the museum (in Aviation Way) as well. As has been mentioned, for the B25, the CASA and the Lincoln, it all went down hill after the auction and I seriously doubt any of them will ever be fully assembled again. Ones that got away for sure, sadly.

    in reply to: Red 11 Flies! #802590
    Roobarb
    Participant

    G-AWHK does not have the four blade Rotol prop and instead utilises a Hamilton-Standard three blade unit. The spinner is from a CCF Hurricane and is the correct unit for the prop fitted. To fit the end cap utilised for the B of B film would be unlikely as they are of a differing internal profile and it would make the spinner too long. We’d be more than happy if someone would like to donate a serviceable four blade Dowty prop unit as we have original B of B film spinners to match, however we would then have to change the reduction gear spline for a British unit to fit the hub though.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #802912
    Roobarb
    Participant

    P9374 had the same Merlin III and that didn’t whistle. There is still divided opinion on this even at HFL and ARC. N3200 does have the shrouded rear view mirror but it doesn’t have the .303 case ejection port aerodynamic deflector plates that were fitted for the rebuild of P9374. The plates were a mod to assist the casings from moving away from the lower wing surface to alleviate skin damage from them bouncing back in the airflow. They sit directly in front of the port. The ejector ports on N3200 are directly open to the airflow and may well act like a woodwind instrument as the air passes over them much as blowing over a reed or a thick blade of grass held rigid. The easy way to prove one way or another would be for us to fly a sortie with the ejector ports blanked over with speed tape.

    in reply to: Red 11 Flies! #802954
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Big congratulations to Richard, Steve, Dave, Paul and all the team at Air Leasing. The first flight of this aircraft since October 1968. She looks lovely and typically “lively”…;)

    in reply to: What is in the LANCASTER Hangar at Duxford now? #807799
    Roobarb
    Participant

    The viewing gallery remains open to see the daily activities in what is now the maintenance hangar for ARC. This means that the view is constantly in a state of flux as the aircraft come and go for different reasons and don’t just sit there static for months. The “old” ARC hangar is now our “projects” facility as well as having HFL at the Northern end. Opening of the gallery is controlled by the IWM so if it’s locked it’s because they haven’t opened it!

    in reply to: Battle of Britain film Cine Film #809771
    Roobarb
    Participant

    CCF Hurricanes normally have a Packard Merlin 224 or a RR Merlin 29 with a Ham Standard prop and associated reduction gear spline. Perhaps one of the other static aircraft had borrowed it in some way as they are not directly interchangeable for the Dowty item. Looking at the image again enlarged, it may well be an optical trick that I’ve fallen foul of as the leg shape looks more like a CCF one than a Hawker leg as the shock absorber isn’t visible. Perhaps I should wear my glasses more often! :stupid:

    in reply to: Wrecks at Duxford 21st April 1978 #809861
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Nice set of photo’s from another time that fortunately I remember well. Thanks for posting them. Nice “Ju-52”. I wonder what happened to that… :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Battle of Britain film Cine Film #809865
    Roobarb
    Participant

    With regard to the Hurricane, I wouldn’t agree with Mk12 saying it may be CF-SMI, as the CCF Hurricanes don’t have the cranked Hawker tailwheel leg and in all my pictures of CF-SMI it has the straight tail-leg strut as built originally in Canada.

    Roobarb

    in reply to: Battle of Britain film Cine Film #810670
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Connie’s the one on the right.

    in reply to: Pay’s Spitfire MH603 #811181
    Roobarb
    Participant

    MH603 as per the original thread.

    in reply to: Pay’s Spitfire MH603 #811333
    Roobarb
    Participant

    I suppose one of us has to say it, so it might as well be me :rolleyes:

    The colours used seem a bit on the “unusual” side compared to what I’m familiar with…

    Roobarb

    in reply to: Castle Air Museum #814995
    Roobarb
    Participant

    Any close-ups of the B17 Virgin’s delight? I remember a bit in “Control Column” many years ago about Jim Babcock and gang delivering it from Aero Union after finding new owners for “Class of 44” another Aero Union B17 that became “Sentimental Journey” with the Confederate Air Force (more PC titles are available, but that’s what it was in 1978…).

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,070 total)