dark light

Hammer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 611 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2422833
    Hammer
    Participant

    The numbers seem to be in line with what’s been reported before with respect to procurement and operating costs, so they seem plausible. Are these numbers from the “leaked” report?

    Exactly!

    And as far as it has been said all over the place here in Brazil the French apparently failed to present the “requested” 40% discount on their originaly offered price.

    Thus remains the massive price difference in favour of the Gripen NG.

    Regards,

    Hammer

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2422865
    Hammer
    Participant

    The Folha newspaper, the same who broght out the leakage of FABs report, says that it believes that the proposed unit costs – including 5-year post-sale support, training package and some armament (not much!) – is: Gripen US$ 70 Million, F-18 US$100 Million and Rafale US$140 Million.

    How reasonable do these number seem to you?

    Regards,

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2422876
    Hammer
    Participant

    I’m not so sure Brazil could be any worse off using Rafale if Venezuela is using the Su-30. The latter is much more labor intensive. If Brazil is acting as the de facto parts supplier for their own planes then it shouldn’t be all that bad to maintain their own fleet let alone offer export options substantially cheaper than direct from the French.

    Why would any potential foreign buyer opt for Brazilian-built Rafales instead of the original French ones? I wouldn’t! Don’t forget the French banks are bigger richer and work with much lower interest rates. the workforce cost is marginal in a high value, high tech item such as the Rafale. On the other hand, financing costs are the real “make or break” item, and there Brazil just cannot compete!

    Regards,

    Hammer

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2423076
    Hammer
    Participant

    most sources are dated from september when the announcements took place, like this one:

    http://www.e24.fr/entreprises/defense/article130562.ece/Le-Bresil-negocie-36-avions-Rafale.html

    especially the part:

    “L’Elysée a précisé que les six premiers appareils, dont le premier exemplaire sera livré en 2013, seront construits entièrement en France et que graduellement la technologie serait transférée pour permettre aux Brésiliens d’assembler les autres avions. Le Brésil pourra ainsi assembler les Rafale et les vendre dans les autres pays d’Amérique latine, a expliqué le ministre brésilien des Affaires étrangères, Celso Amorim. “

    “Elysée (french presidency) said the first six aircraft would have been assembled in france, and the technology transfer would gradually to brasil allow the assembly of other aircraft. That way brasil will be able to build the rafales and sell them to other countries in latin america, the brasilian foreign affaires minister Celso Amorim explained”

    Well my friend, noticing how “easy” it has been so far for Dassault to sell Rafales abroad one must ask: “if the Rafale is so expensive for a Brazilian sized military budget, would there ever be another South American country able to foot such a large fighter acquisition bill?

    Always keeping in mind that the Venezuelans are solely buying from China and from Russia now, that Chile just bought TEN brand new F-16C/D(!) and Argentina is disposing of its obsolete military means at an alarming rate in order to desperately save cash… Colombia is a good US customer and recently got some revamped Kfirs from Israel and Ecuador is looking at China and Russia for new aircraft… As you see, Dassault could just as well offered Brazil the exclusive Rafale sales rights to the Moon and Mars and it would do us the same good as “The whole South American Market”…

    No one outside the Ministry of Defense is taking seriously the “export potential” of the Brazilian built Rafales.

    Also differently from what you are assuming there is just no guarantee that the Brazilian-built aircraft might cost less then the planes now built in France. The costs to set up a new production line with new local suppliers as well as the garanteed margin for Embraer here in Brazil will certainly jack up unit prices. Slo if the price is not going to go down the idea is to get the most ToT out of this deal so we can make it all pay out in the end. If it doesn`t pay out then this local production idea makes absolutely no sense.

    Do you agree?

    Regards

    Hammer

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2423281
    Hammer
    Participant

    Your comments seem well informed to me.

    Thank you! 🙂

    Regarding SAAB’s prospects of Gripen sales, I think they are front runners for an order for a small number from Switzerland to replace F-5’s where I believe the purchase of aircraft will need to be sanctioned by a referendum. I think SAAB also has a good chance of further sales to eastern European countries so I don’t see SAAB leaving the fast jet game just yet. Having said that, securing an order from Brazil would transform the Gripen’s prospects.

    From what I undestand, and I haven`t been following this bid so closely, the Swiss are evaluating the C/D version, not the NG… The C/Ds from what I recall are being built from ex-Gripen A/B retired from Swedish Air Force duty. How this would work for the Swiss order I have no clue.

    Regarding the Super Hornet, I read today (can’t remember where) that production will probably cease in 2012 unless further orders are secured this year / next year.

    If the F-35 cost still maintains its escalating trend the US Navy should buy more SH soon.

    Best Regards

    Hammer

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2423447
    Hammer
    Participant

    One of the things that I can’t understand with statements like:

    The french propose the whole technology transfer… that means, brasil will build its own aircraft.. completely and independantly.

    It doesn’t come with some “magic button” to the brasilian worker just pushes it and an aircraft comes out… it means brasil will learn everything there is to know about the aircraft. They’ll have the knowledge they actually lack given to them on a plate… and be free to do whatever they want with it after that… Once they build their own fighters, they can make as many as they wish, no? And if they have the factories and the resources, they will be able to fix their own price for these.

    And one final thing.. I just saw a SAAB comercial:

    http://saab.picsearch.tv/?cat=&q=&bandwidth=high&lmediaid=&order=posted&mediaid=_2_yDOggNZ8ntAeHOthS9g&page=1

    basically, the guy says “we’ll learn to make modern fighters” and in the same time he says “we’ll make an aicraft that will be at least a decade ahead of any competition… the best in the world”

    sounds like a kid in his first year in high school saying “now that I’m with the big guys, I’ll make my PhD before the end of the year”…

    talk about nonsense… 😀

    Well let me explain why I said that above.

    1) France has absolutely no NEED for the Brazilian Industry`s participation in order to keep churning out more Rafales.

    2) If Brazil wants to have its own assembly plant for Rafales and it comes as a natural assumption that such a plant should not be restricted to manufacturing planes just for Brazil, that with this considerable investment Brazil ought to at least manufacture some components for French and foreign ordered Rafales in the future. Maybe even become the single source for such assembly/component.

    As part of its bid offer Boeing offered to us the single source manufacture of all F-18 nose barrels and folding wingtips in the next production round. Such a deal is absolutely contrary to the Rafale program’s idea of building up demand in the French aerospace industry sector.

    If the Rafales were selling like hot cakes in the worldwide fighter market farming out component production might make sense, but this is far from the current situation, right?

    I had the chance to read a Dassault PPT presentation that argued quite enthusiasticaly AGAINST the setting up of a Brazilian manufacturing line for Rafale. This document reafirms pepetedly that such a choice would only make the Rafale costlier for Brazil. But in reality final assmbly and component manufacture are secondary advantages for the quite advanced Brazilian aerospace industry. What interests us in reality is learning how to use new materials and how to leverage new processes that could be used in other industry segments like the commercial and business jets we are developing and manufacturing right now…

    In Brazil we are coming to the conclusion that only by taking part of the full development process can we full absorb the lessons that make up the development of a high tech item such as a fighter plane.
    Now look at Saab…

    Sweden does not need or want the Gripen NG at this stage, who knows? Maybe later…

    Brazil is by far the closest thing they have in terms of a prospective, viable client. If our industry doesn`t participate in its development or our government doesn`t fund this programa Saab might realy be forced to exit the fighter building arena for good.

    Boeing is sitting on tons of F-18 orders from the US Navy, of course they like the idea of wining in Brazil but it really means very little for them in the end.

    This why I see Saab much more suited to respond to the current Brazilian needs than Dassault or Boeing at this stage.

    Do you agree with me?

    Regards,

    Hammer

    in reply to: 36 rafale for Brazil #2 #2423557
    Hammer
    Participant

    My friends, please allow me to shed some light on the recent events regarding the F-X2 bid in Brazil:

    The government (the president and the Defense Minister specifically here) have repeatedly demontrated the interest to buy the Rafale to further the Brazil-France Strategic partnership initiated with the Scorpene purchase last year.

    FAB`s “favorite next gen fighter is openly known to be a much divided opinion.

    1) The FAB fighter comunity, for instance, wants the new fighter YESTERDAY and feels deeply hurt from the AMX local development model that cost it a 10-20 year gap on the fighter force, keeping the desired supersonic F-16s out of Brazilian service instead. They believe that it is not in the FABs best interest to focus hard to come by budget dolars on the development and expansion of the national aerospace industry that seems to be doing real fine in the civilian markets by itself. This position efectively highlights Brazilian military and economig might over neigbours and any other would be regional rivals (Venezuela?).

    2) The FAB engineering comunity thinks the opposit, we have no significant “enemy at the gate” such as the Pakistani, Indians or Chinese, so the FAB should prioritise the development iof the national aerospace industry in order to be able to acheive true independence in the near future. Independence means new valuable products top be developed and exported to foreign markets in both the military and civilian marketplaces. This means mor jobs and mor hard currency income streams.

    The politicians tend to two aspects 1) the geopolitical clout that might come with futher French support for Brazilian desire for a permanent Security Council seat and inside Brazil 2) the material ($$) power of the organized industry syndicates. These have a lot of money to be invested on this year`s make or break presidential campaign…

    The current Saab strategy has successfully imitated the Eurocopter EC-725 bid political strategy from two years ago. Dassault on the other hand apparently neglected this and let the powerful FIESP syndicate to join up with Saab instead.

    One thing is clear from my point of view: Saab needs this sell much more than Dassault, for this reason they seem to be much more willing to accept Brazilian industrial participation then the French or the Americans.

    The big question now is can Lula support the press backlash if he overiding the FAB recomendation ends opting for the most expensive fighter in the bid? The leaking of this document is in line with FAB commands decision NOT TO ACCEPT the Rafale at any cost.They simply were burned by working previously with the French ion the Mirage III, on Eurocopter rotarycraft and on the ever complicating 50 EC-725 negotiation phase…

    The French have a very poor post sale image in Brazil.

    Time is also crucial since the presidetial elections are set for Octoberand the official government candidate Mrs Rousseff, a technocrat hand picked by Lula himself, untill now seems to be sputtering at the starting gate…

    Finally dureng the now infamous Sept 7th meeting with Sarkozy Lula declared quite clearly that he “favoured the Rafale”BUT that the French WOULD HAVE TO CUT THEIR PRICES for Brazil to purchase the Rafale. No cut, no purchase. What has been repeated now over and over is that the French HAVE NOT CUT THEIR COSTS in the second round of the Best and Final Offer request. To their and Sarkozy`s chagrin.

    I hope it all makes more sense now.

    in reply to: 36 Dassault Rafale for Brasil – Official #2404551
    Hammer
    Participant

    Well guys,

    The big issue right now is the continuous posponements of the F-X2 decision. First it was suposed to be Sept 7th (national independence day), then Oct 23rd (Aviator Day) then begibning of Dec, then late Dec, and now sometime in January 2010… This delays point to to the risk o having another cancelled fighter aircraft bid because next October we’ll have presidential elections…

    The French reputedly have not been able to bring the Rafale’s cost down as was promissed by Sarkozy on Sept 7th. The questio is will Lula buy the mnost expensive fighter against all other advice? Will he expose himself like this a few months before the nexte election especially since his candidate Mrs Dilma Roussef is NOT doing to good against her prospective rivals for the presidential office? These are certainly REALLY big “if”s for Lula….

    Many here believe that the Rafale sale to Brazil may be getting much more important to Dassault than it is for both the French and Brazilian Governments. Besides the new advanced fighter order Brazil is declared to be very interested in some four Mistral class LHDs, six FREMM frigates and many more Scorpene subs. There is also a demand for Felin – the French “infantryman of the future” wearable soldier hardware, and many other oportunities her for the general French defence industry, besides Dassault.

    Regards,

    Hammer

    in reply to: 36 Dassault Rafale for Brasil – Official #2405064
    Hammer
    Participant

    20% of embraer is owned by the french rafale builder, makes it difficult for swedish , let them leaks this kind of “hoaxy” rumors!

    curious that Fab senior gen turned his butt from the fantastic F18 to the swedish krown into such short lap time! bribes?

    Let me try to make this issue a lot clearer. I am from Brazil and have been following this bid since a great many years ago.

    Inside FAB thgere seems to be a number od “parties” regarding the choice for the next fighter.

    a) The “Fighter Mafia” Party: These want the best and most capable fighter. Originally it was they who favoured the Sukhoi Flanker as the next fighter for FAB. in this last round the elimination of the Su-35 made them flock to the combat proven F-18 camp.

    b) The “Engineer” Party: These are the people inside FAB connected to the CTA – Aeronautics Tecnology Center in São José dos Campos city. They are fiercely “tech independent” minded folks. They are the ones that support Buying Brazilian and buying from Embraer as a basic concept. Even the AMX program, a major economic failure from any perspective is painted by them as a crucial step that made Embraer ctechologically capable of developing rge ERJ line later down the road. They have always been pro-Gripen even before the F-X2 restarted. To them the Gripen was the only project that had the size and costs that would allow for a easy digestion by the Brazialian high tech industry.

    c) The “Logistics” Party: This is a second tier, but still important, group. They are the ones saying that Brazil can buy any fighter as long as it is American built. This is absolutely not any kind of political orientation, but rather, a pragmatical approach since it is so much simpler to purchase spares and support equipment from the USA than it is from any other nation. The US forces pack so many spare parts in its warehouses that it is very easy to request and to receive immediate supplies from them instead of from the original manufacturer. They were the first to back up the F-18 proposals in the F-X2.

    Outside the FAB, at the Ministry of Defense, we have still another “party”

    d) The “Ministry First” Party: Nelson Jobim is slowly building up the new Defense Ministry. To do this he will have to consolidate multiple redundant areas, now spread out between the three until now independent Military Commands (Army/Navt/Air Force) under his own power in the Ministry. The F-X1 was a full FAB deal, they defined the requirements and they selected the winner, the then Minister no much more then a “crowned” distant observer. During the F-X2 process the Ministry moved in and started to assert its own view as to the direction the program should follow. The President clearly and publicly favors Jobim, the Minister’s will over the Air Force commander (Brig Saito) opinion.

    The “industrial card” is played.

    Recently Saab followed the exemple of Eurocopter’s bid to sell 50 Super Pumas to the Brazilian Armed Forces and reached out to the important S”ao Paulo State Industrial Federation (FIESP) who started putting pressure on the Governmente to support the Gripen NG proposal. It is still unclear now to determine how much power FIESP really yields on this program. In this direction a number of engineers from Akaer a smallish engineering services house here has beeen sent to Sweden to assist in the detailed design of teh Gripen-NG’s new wing.

    Some observers point out that FIESP really caries a big clout and that it’s interference is behind the continued delays in anouncing the nexte fighters identity.

    One thing is clear the US ToT track record regarding Brazil in the last 10 years is extremely poor. And this does not help the F-18 at all. This and anti-US leaning people very close to the Brazilian President are working around the clock to make absolutely sure that no US aircraft is purchased for any reason.

    This then begs the question: how come againsta all and every odds the Super Hornet made the short-list? I’ve heard that the F-18s presence replaced other riskier potential players (such as the Russian aircraft industry that might make easy disqualification down the road,the same way it happened in the F-X1 where to almost every one’s chagrin the Flanker ended up amongst the 3 best qualified contestants.

    On the 7th of September date (at Independence commemorative ball) Lula told the press 2 things:

    b) The geostrategical partnership deal with the French was going ahead as planned to everyones satisfaction.

    b) That he personally favoured the the Rafal but that it was at thatstage way to expensive The FAB would buy the Rafale (ONLY) IF Dassault fiddeled its prices and regular maintenance costs to the French airforce and navy contractual limits.

    So this is the story so far. The delay of the publication of the aircraft selection to the Christmas week sugests that the idea was to drop the bom as everyone is distracted with the Holliday Season, or that a final agreement really had not been reached to date.

    So, that senior Brazilian Air Force General (Brig Saito) is currently doing his best to get every one possible on the Gripens boat because he knows that if the fight too hard for the Super Hornet he might end up with nothing at all. As this Government is geting more openly anti-US than ever thought possible. Now we have to wait in order to see how much more push FIESP gives to the Gripen NG proposal specially within Congress, a distraction that may come out being too politicaly expensive for the Lula Administration as we enter a decisive presidential election year for his party.

    I hope this long post assited you in understending the complexity of the F-X2 situation in Brazil.

    Best Regards

    Hammer

    in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023367
    Hammer
    Participant

    i was talking about a carrier for brazil

    Personally I’d welcome a partenership with the Chinese where we help them develop a new modern CV hull and they build it for us with western engines, sensors and systems and we complete it in Brazil with localy created SICOMTA Combat Management System. Cheap and efective!

    Rgds

    Hammer

    in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023372
    Hammer
    Participant

    Brazil could go the Russian way, ski-jump instead of cats.

    The Brazilian shipbuilding industry died 10 to 15 years ago, though. Now South Korea is investing some, but I’m not sure that currently Brazil has either capability nor capacity to build a carrier at home, even one based on commercial standards.

    Maybe someone from Brazil would comment?

    You ar correct Distiler our naval industry went belly up around the early 1980s because our yards grew lazy out of lack of real competition from top notch foreign yards. The government was at the time distracted with out of control inflation and just looked elsewhere as all our yards went bankrupt. In the last 5 years things have changed radically and Brazilian state owned oil corporation Petrobras is acting as the major incentive for the reconstruction of this industry. Petrobras has given out over 100 ship building contracts to several yards, some of them built from the ground up just to build these ships.

    The last Brazilian drydocks were built in the 1920s, now there are some 4-5 MAJOR drydocks being built at the same time in the country. Tere is certainly a ship building revolution going on over here now an the Brazilian Navy is benefiting from it.

    Check these sites out:

    http://www.estaleiroatlanticosul.com.br/

    http://www.prominp.com.br/objects/files/2007-11/1892_03.%20Estaleiro%20Rio%20Grande.pdf

    There is also the “Estaleiro da Bahia” and a still unconfirmed mega yard at São Luiz in the North of Brazil.

    Regards

    Hammer

    in reply to: AAfter RAFALE deal, Brazil need a new Carrier ? #2023478
    Hammer
    Participant

    Current plans allow for the construction of two new CVs plus four new Mistral class LPDs… Similar to the recently announced Russian Navy plans aint it: ;):diablo:

    Who knos the Chinese Navy is cuddling up to the Brazilian Navy, maybe they will supply the CV’s hulls in the future…

    Comments,

    Hammer

    in reply to: PLAN Carrier Updates. #2023481
    Hammer
    Participant

    I can’t believe that the Ucranian designers/builders never thought out the “easy way” to get the engines inside the half-finished hull… It just seems a tad too stupid to close up the hull BEFORE inserting the engines into it. Who knows, they might even resort to installing electric drives/pods to simplify the process, what do you all think?

    Regards,

    Hammer

    in reply to: São Paulo #2024598
    Hammer
    Participant

    In the early 1980s, didn’t Brazil have a plan to have 2 home-built carriers by 2000?

    I don’t know, really, but the fact is Only now do we have a fully functional Def Ministry able to consolidate Brazil’s geopolitical objectives, uniting military planning and purchasing. Then all plans were exclusively Navy desires, and being independent there was no political desire to geive the military forces money AND a free reign to pursue their own policies. Now the two fleet navy is a Def Ministry mandate, sometimes going against many “crowned heads” ideas inside the Navy.

    A second Naval Fleet meens many more surface combatents and ABSOLUTELY NO USED NAVAL SHIP PURCHASES. Everything will have to be built inhouse, such as the 4x Scorpene, the SSN and the myriad patrol boats to be contracted to private yards.

    Regards,

    Hammer

    in reply to: São Paulo #2024609
    Hammer
    Participant

    I understand where your coming from but for the huge cost of deploying a carrier just for the sake of maintaining carrier doctrine seems like a massive waste to me, especially when there isn’t any plans (that I have heard of anyway) of a new Brazilian carrier on the way in the near future. and im not sure training for harriers carrier ops is more expensive than the constant training required to perform carrier traps?

    Hi guys, here’s the scoop on Brazilian Naval Aviation

    After last year’s END (Estratégia Nacional de Defesa) was published the Lula Government recognized that it could not reach its large geopolitical goals without a strong and modern military force. To do so required revamping the forces individual and joint doctrines, the current military means and the military industry all at the same time.

    The first step is the purchase towards this is the purchase of 50 locally built EC725 helos plus four new locally built Scorpene derivatives.

    The “Planos de Equipamento e Articulação” (reorganization and reequipment plans) for each of the armed forces have been sent to the Brazilian president and he has agreed to support most of what’s in it. The Navy will eventualy get (if future presidents agree with this policy!) in the next 30 years two new carriers and 48 brand new fighters to put on them. The END details a major expansion of the surface and submarine forces as well as the creation of a new Fleet to based in the north of the country, close to teh mouth of the Amazon River.

    So, if everything goes acording to plan everything will be wildly different.

    Coments?

    Regards,

    Hammer

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 611 total)