as long as you post credit I dont see the problem…..
coanda
very very nice!
coanda
There are a fair few from school days for me,
I live on the low flying route to the north of cosford.
C130 turning round church steeple at no more than 250 feet, probably about 70 dgrees bank,
jaguars at night, hawk four ships at night.
over the school, the Yellow and dark green buccaneer at about 400 feet,
herc three ships at 500 feet look pretty cool 🙂
unexpected, even on an airfield,
F3 on missed approach to Cosford, supposedly the F3 front seater knew my boss, didnt ring a bell with him tho lol….
GR1 airfield attacks were always welcome too!
myself and 30 little cadets also got an impromptu (and VERY energetic) display from red 10 one week day a couple of years back, that was pretty cool, after seeing that I wouldnt like to try dogfighting one in anything bigger than a hawk!
Ahh nearly forgot this……….
coming back down A1 from geordie land….
get out for ‘comfort stop’ to see an MH53 shoot out of the fog and murk at 250 feet (max!). If I hadnt of just got out of the car, I would never have seen it…..
and then I got to witness part of a thursday war…also very cool. i thought it was very unsporting to get attacked not five miles out of port…:)
Perhaps not really flypast material but all pretty cool to me
coanda
so who let the RC aircraft onto a live airfield?
😀
😉
coanda
I did the welding programe, its very fulfilling.
coanda
very cool gary.
coanda
very cool gary.
coanda
step out of drab 14 man tent at 10 in morning to see a Hercules banking at about 70 degrees, 250 ft through a certain welsh valley. because it was coming round a corner, nobody heard it until it got to us, so I saw the whole thing by pure chance…..and most of the rest of the wee cadets missed out (evil chuckle).
coanda
ok dhfan, NOT gutted, but ‘substantially incomplete’
🙂
coanda
if we preserve either of the (standing) TSR2’s it should be the cosford one, not the IWM one, which is basically gutted….unless you know of another mostly complete TSR2? 🙂
the cosford one is electrics capable as far as I am aware, and mostly complete excepting engines which are outside of the airframe.
coanda
regards jgs’s post,
if your not aware of and familiar with this, go back and have a serious chat with your flight instructor.
coanda
The TSR2 is a truly magnificent aircraft….I am currently making dynavectors model of it, more or less as you see it in the museum, with a couple of differences (one of which I am very unhappy about but have little choice)
It is my understanding that the TSR2 at cosford has operable electronics, it is indeed essentially complete bar the engines. However I have no idea about what, if anything, is in the starboard avionics bay.
There is a cut away engine right next to the aircraft, along with a sectioned undercarriage leg, and also an ejection seat mounted on a pole, I have enough photo’s for a pretty comprehensive walk around now, including the cockpits which are also essentially complete.
The guys in charge at cosford are very keen to keep this aircraft safe.
It is also my understanding that a great deal of parts(including major sub assemblies dont know exactly what) were rediscovered in one of the MOD hangars at Aston down, and were put up for auction and bought immediatly. (as you would!)
I would like to see this aircraft outside on a nice day on the ‘new’ jp pans on the other side of the fence, you’d get some excellent shots like that.
Cosfords is truly a unique collection, better than Duxfords in some respects apart of course from the flying element.
regards the belfast, its a wopping big aircraft! its still basically complete, and probably wouldnt take much to have it flying again if the structure is ok.
nice shots kev!
coanda
maybe they could try make it run on red bull!!
coanda
I feel sorry for that airframe
coanda
regards my last post,
I have experience flying both the C152 and the SA Bulldog.
I dont think its any good to anyone not being able to see right around your airframe as much as possible. This includes(the very important) upwards and to the side.
It is a failing in my own personal opinion that you have to bank in the opposite direction to the one you want to turn in just to make sure its actually clear in the direction you want to go, you have NO idea if your going to climb up into somebodys flight path, and you have NO idea if some is going to descend into your flight path,
why?
well you can’t see can you?
This is why this aircraft is dangerous.
The Pipers are only a little bit better you still cant bloody see upwards, although you can see to the upper side and rear/forwards.
In my cross country experience in low wing aircraft, such as the bulldog and the grob tutor, i have had more of a problem finding features directly in front of me than anything else, if they are quite close by.
I have no nav experience in high wing aircraft. Although it is obvious that the downwards view is superior to low wing types.
But of course your not enjoying that downwards view too much are you? (mind you there is bugger all else to look at, except metal.
Another note on the 152, The fuel gauges are notoriously wrong(or not working), and because of the positioning of the pitot tube, the ASI can be out by as much as FIFTY knots in a crosswind. What a bloody stupid design.
This isnt meant to offend anyone, more to critique the aircraft design
coanda