dark light

scotavia

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 2,399 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Spitfire for RAFM Hendon #1281038
    scotavia
    Participant

    A very impressive skilled build. I am pleased that it will be on public display because so many models only appear at annual special events.

    in reply to: Martin Shaw TV series (Very old thread) #1282264
    scotavia
    Participant

    Well done,a very good series . I hope it makes it across to other channels for a wider audience.

    in reply to: HMS Hermes – Last Chance Saloon #1286481
    scotavia
    Participant

    ships

    Perhaps it is all about the cost of preservation. There are many in the uk who are keen to see larger ships preserved,however the money involved is daunting.

    When you start to look at the cost of intitial purchase which must equate to scrap value,then add the need for dock facilities,labour and materials it is a costly project. For actual display the ship will still be on the water in most cases exposed to the corrosive atmosphere above the waterline with a constant need for humidity levels to be kept in balance.

    I think it is almost a miracle that we have a number of large ships preserved in the UK.And the neareast comparision I can think of in aviation terms is the Vulcan which is a battleship of the skies.

    in reply to: HMS Hermes – Last Chance Saloon #1289824
    scotavia
    Participant

    I found this useful online resource about Uk historic ships
    http://www.nhsc.org.uk/aboutNRHV.cfm

    in reply to: Request law info UK Mil air salvage #1290224
    scotavia
    Participant

    JDK….If the authorities had time and resources then they could find evidence and prosecute those responsible for removing parts without permission. But they are not interested and quite rightly have much higher priority problems to deal with. The two individuals I knew about were prosecuted about twenty years ago although in both cases the actual charges related to thefts from museums and the parts from crashed aircraft were not considered proven as stolen.

    All….My idea of a business was only an idea and the inspiration came from those who recover wrecks in other countries.

    Calm down Garry, I do not have any intention of taking this idea any further forward. I am fully aware of all the arguments about sites being memorials and being historical in context. I do not agree with that view unless a real memorial is funded and put on site.

    in reply to: Can you guess the Air Force? #1290869
    scotavia
    Participant

    Comoros, one of 2 C47 operated.

    in reply to: Request law info UK Mil air salvage #1292376
    scotavia
    Participant

    Sorry to give the impression that this recovery idea relates to a secret location. I had in mind a properly organised business to finally clear up the visible wrecks which are mostly on high ground. Although some people regard the remaining wrecks as of no use in restorations this is far from the truth.And what could not be used would be sold as scrap.Doing it properly would ensure all parts are recovered then evaluated. Very little at the moment stops the scrapman from taking items directly from the crash site.

    There have been several well organised recoveries as part of projects to restore missing types or very rare types. What is missing is a concerted effort to survey then recover parts before it is to late.Sadly the restrictions on resale make a commercial operation a financial non starter. So good luck to the small number of dedicated museum recovery teams,surely though it could all be done quicker with better finance?

    Those who remove parts without permission will in my view never be prosecuted ,its easy to pass off old parts as war souvenirs or salvage yard finds.

    in reply to: New Flying boat service on the Clyde. #1292563
    scotavia
    Participant

    It is a triumph of determination for the owner, he has battled the beaurocrats for ages on this business. Those who had urgent business in the area of planned operations had only one option prior to this, rent a helicopter due to the lack of airfields and even airstrips. And at an average of £850 an hour that is very costly.

    Dragons Den is a complete joke and most of the so called contestants are only there for free publicity and even though many are made to look like prats
    they are so desperate they are happy to do it.

    in reply to: Request law info UK Mil air salvage #1292926
    scotavia
    Participant

    Thanks for that reply,I see no point in paying money for a recovery then have the MOD claim what they want.Sad as it is the wreck will continue to be robbed by those who have no interest in following the rules.

    in reply to: One for Wessex Boy #1304138
    scotavia
    Participant

    another Wessex pic

    Heres a Wessex XR528 at work in Hong Kong .In 1980 in think.

    in reply to: UK Gate Guardians #1304376
    scotavia
    Participant

    You will waste a lot of your time phoning RAF bases.Use the published source
    Wrecks and relics,its not that difficult especially as there are not many bases now to list!

    in reply to: CAA Complaint #392646
    scotavia
    Participant

    It is very likely that the Cessna was one of several operated by a UK based house photography company. I have also complained regarding the low flying aspect direct to the CAA. Sadly I did not have photographic proof which could have backed up my estimate of 250..300 feet agl over the town.Even the military avoid direct overflights at 250 feet and go around the the town or are around 1,000 ft.

    Not only are the flights over built up areas a hazard,they also spend to long operating between 250…500 feet in the military low flying areas which increases the risk of collision. For example 35 minutes in the middle of the Spey valley , a busy fast jet transit area . They would never see the fast jet coming round the bend because they are too busy circling farms and single houses. I have never forgotten the Jaguar / Cessna mid air at Carno in Wales and I file CANP when planning to operate in the LFAs.

    If you see the Twits doing this for ages over your town/ village then I suggest you grab some pics, including foreground objects.You dont need binocs to read the reg! Then tell the CAA.The local airport/airfield do not have any input on activity away from their circuit..zone.

    Oh and I do aerial photography for a living and dislike this unsafe way of operating.I produce good quality pics and my commercial pilots stick to the rules.I am not a NIMBY but just dislike the way this type of flying gives a bad name to light aviation and it would be even worse if an accident occured.

    in reply to: C47 staying at Lossiemouth question ident #1306831
    scotavia
    Participant

    C47 at Lossie

    The local connection is that Edward Brothers aviation is now based about 30 miles from RAF Lossiemouth,and they have been maintaining this important survivor.Lossiemouth is their nearest active airfield.

    What surprised me during a trawl of the FAA database was many of the USA registered population of C47 and DC3 are registered….624. A fair number in Florida on mosquito control.

    in reply to: C47 staying at Lossiemouth question ident #1307337
    scotavia
    Participant

    Thanks Galdri that fits.

    in reply to: Flying Suit or Civvies? #392912
    scotavia
    Participant

    Flying suit and leather flying gloves in all except airliners. I can cram all my film/lenscaps/notepads etc in all those pockets and it gives me a place to sew on all sorts of patches.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,221 through 2,235 (of 2,399 total)