Is this the second one at Baxterley? I recall spotting one about 6 years ago.

Not pathetic, very realistic appraisal .

If you are about to buy from a bookstand check your copy carefully. My look at several yesterday revealed a horrible printing fault which had ruined at lease 6 pages per issue with ink staining.

There are a number of as recovered from the foreshore wrecks on display and they have lasted a long time if treated promptly.They need stabilising then sealing against the air.The actual recovery is not complicated by being under water and at depth. Find a destination for display, raise funding and get that P 38 out and on show.

When an official body publishes a statement which contains errors surely it is correct that the very people referred to ,get a platform to correct those errors ? It is of no help to allow something which is not true to be allowed to go unchallenged? In the days before forums such as this it could take a week before a counter point was published for all to see.

From mountain to museum display..how it can be done well…Norway…http://luftfartsmuseum.no/fly/junkers-ju-88-a-4-3/

Oh I am not ignorant of the amount of airframes already needing a roof and attention,just saying that the recovery could be done with relative ease compared to some Uk epics. Yes i also agree that you do need a certain clarity regarding destination before official recovery and in this case that may never happen.Another angle could be to recover it then sink it into adiving centre fresh water site and let it become an attraction and training aid !