Now THERE’s an idea!!;)
A national aviation museum, with a useable runway, warm buildings and local staff on hand? It sounds too good to be true. Move that silly allotment space from London and relocate it to the Hall would be an epic but GREAT idea!
Sorry JagRigger, the RAF own neither you, me or a Wellington. The RAF Museum have had any sense of adventure beat out of them by legislation, and will never attempt such an activity.
I can’t believe this thread is still going. Doh…..
I bought Flight of the Mew Gull, by Alex Henshaw over the inter web and happily found his dated signature inside it. Very pleased with that 🙂
When are we going to see pictures of the Bf109E?
What will the local bowsers do now when they want to go the “shag and shuffle”? Lol!
Because her original components that couldn’t be used for flight are now used in the static rebuild, not sure which ones though.
I’m sure Fluffy will be along to give you a first hand insight into this. As David says, lots of original metalwork was damaged and removed, so I too find it difficult to believe it’s more original than when it flew.
In my (23 years of) experience, “Raf tw@s”.
Why don’t children qualify for free entry???
Maybe the attitude of Canada with its ambitious recovery of Halifax NA337 set where we should be with all of this! Early bomber aircraft are incredibly badly represented in the U.K – Manchester-Stirling and Whitley paid a vital role in our ability to strike back in the early days of the war but there seems to be a perception that Bomber Command really only started when the Lancaster arrived!
Regards the memorial itself – maybe a Lancaster outline on the hillside would have had more impact – in a similar way to the White Horse !
I feel compelled to agree. As a resident of Lincolnshire (in the Faldingworth, Scampton and Hemswell triangle) thanks to a full career in the RAF, I get a bit fed up with these guys getting their way creating monuments etc.
Surely it’d be better to get those Stirling bits from Stafford and add new material until it’s complete, finish that Hampden at Cosford, and that Lancaster from Kermit???? Put them in a cylindrical glass walled shed tail to tail with the names of the 55,573 inscribed in the glass. A proper lasting and relavant memorial and the only place in the world to see the types together. Add sounds of crew in checks, and Churchill quotes and jobs a good un! Spires indeed….
It was the absence of these caps on my crank that had confused the issue. With the drawings above, all became clear.
Thank you gentlemen.
324789 is the number I have Pete, can you tell me anything of its history?
I think the assumption that both he and I made was that it was fed from one end, all the way through, rather from each bearing journal.
I’m going to feed some lock wire into the big end journals to see the route more clearly, I think.
Pete, the crank was definitely used, from an airworthy engine.
Thank you all for your contribution.
C6
The thread is titled ‘Duxford Diary’. The coming and goings at Duxford, a small amount is modern. What’s the issue?
It’s not really an “issue” as you so combativly put it, but plenty of folks are asking about the new aircraft seen at Duxford on the Historic Forum. All the answers can be found in Modern forum just a click away. As this is a Duxford Diary, surely it’s better to ask questions elsewhere? There’s no need to get your knickers in a knot. 😉
Ahem, historic forum…
You’re welcome!
Yes but all this happens whether or not they are being used. If it’s RAF manpower and resources.
The RAF has little in the way of manpower and resources. There is little capacity for this any more. I doubt it’d get beyond the risk assessment if the RAF got involved. Oh, I know as I’ve just left after 23 years as a techie.