dark light

pjhydro

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 845 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • pjhydro
    Participant

    That’s actually a good point. The Soviets might not have been able to control much of the seas, but they’d sure have given the the US a hell of a headache. All those subs and missile boats can be pesky beggars and it only takes one to get through to cause a great deal of mischief.

    Of course no one is debating the fact that the USN is in charge and has been since WWII, but they’ve never had that total impunity that the RN did post-Trafalgar.

    Precisely, hell the RN or FN could give the USN a bloody nose. Not for long, but it would hurt and they’d lose a carrier or two.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2031911
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Aww hell I got mixed up. Sorry.

    I’ll let you off, it is the weekend after all. Actually a mate who drives T23s says he’s glad they never been tested in that respect, wishes they had a CIWS. Says he’s watched too many SeaWolfs go hunting for subs to rely on it as the only missile interceptor.

    in reply to: HMS Invincible #2031915
    pjhydro
    Participant

    The ships were designed for use in pretty awful seas for quite long periods, similar to the current frigates. They were supposed to hunt for Soviet subs in the GIUK gap for long periods and ended up not having to for much of their lives. That’s why the Frigates didn’t need replacing by 2005 as thought when they were built, that must make up for a year in the South Atlantic.

    Yeah fair enough I suppose, though their contemp(t)oraries the T42 and T21 all have cracked hulls that needed reinforcing.

    pjhydro
    Participant

    joining this debate very late in the day, I would challenge the assertion that the USN is the most powerful ever seen. Its power is challengable and always has been. Throughout its modern (post45) incarnation there has always been a fleet/military/air-force able to stand up to it in certain regions, or certainly deny it immediate access. Surely the RN of the early-mid 19th Century holds this title as it was utterly unchallenged and could do what it liked?

    in reply to: HMS Invincible #2031951
    pjhydro
    Participant

    I think he was talking more about fatigue damage from the rough seas more than the alleged successful attacks by the Argentine airforce.

    Yes I was, the fatigue that Invincible went under in 1982 must have eaten a large hole in her structural lifetime.

    As for the damage, there are all sorts of weird and wonderful conspiracy theories (even to the extent that a whole new invincible was built in secret by the yanks!!). But a persistent rumour is that a bomb passed through her super-structure without going off. I personally don’t see it myself, the famous hand-over photo of Vince and Lusty doesn’t appear to show any damage.

    in reply to: HMS Invincible #2031976
    pjhydro
    Participant

    I would have thought it would be a great buy for anyone who was not going to thrash it around in heavy seas for long, she must be knackered by now, all that time in the South Atlantic early in her career can’t have been good.

    Then there is the persistent rumour that she was hit in some way during corporate… bomb through a funnel is the one that comes up again again. I never know what to believe would seem difficult to have the whole crew keep mum.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2031979
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Possibly, but they usually tick to 2 or none, must be a reason for it. And remember that the Phalanx’s will just be transferred across from the T23’s, so not much cost involved since they’ll probably be FFBNW anyway.

    Is the drawing based on a real ship/design?

    I didn’t know T23 used Phalanx? Must be one of its much vaunted stealth features :p

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032100
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Maybe but I think a lot of the Government’s grand plans for concreting over the entire M11 corridor and sounding areas has fallen by the wayside of the recession, I’m not convinced the Tories want to do the same.

    Think we’ve gone off on a bit of a tangent here though……………..

    You think?? 😀 It is Friday afternoon though and time for me to go.

    hmmm maybe a chav firing gun?

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032103
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Oi its not all bad, most of East Herts is quite nice.

    It will all be built over with more stevenage estates eventually, just a matter of time, the Borough Council has designs on conquest.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032106
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Haha, I’ve spent most my life living in most of East Herts; Wareside, Stanstead Abbotts, Much Hadham; I’ve lived in Cheshunt for a while but i’ve always gone with the District council and refered to it as Broxbourne (the same with Waltham cross)

    Snob! 😀 Dated a girl from Much Hadham, wouldn’t go back again.

    btw HMS Welwyn Garden City would be better than sodding Waltham Cross (whether or not you can count it as a new town or not is another matter…)

    Ah well there you have the “Garden City” Class, whole different breed of ship, a slightly older and slightly less chavvy warship than your “New Town” Class, but only just. Letchworth would be the lead ship. (A town which was built without a single pub or bar by the way).

    I woud suggest equipping both with some sort of car burning device and maybe a rapid firing giro gun.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032144
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Lived most of my life just up the road in Stanstead Abbotts, I was the only child of three not born in Harlow Hospital.

    You could of gone for a hattrick and added Waltham Cross; AKA the ghetto of East Herts.
    .

    Nice. Hertfordshire and its many jewels….why did I ever move away?

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032147
    pjhydro
    Participant

    CVF should have been called carrier names, Eagle, Hermes, Centaur

    Given the size of the current and future fleet, you could probably just use all the names present at Trafalgar… Love Temeraire and Leviathan!

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032158
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Speaking as someone that lives within 15 minutes drive of both Harlow and Stevenage you’ve picked some real shockers there:eek:

    Tongue firmly in cheek there! :p I grew up in the first! There was a HMS Stevenage in WW2 as the glorious and delight filled Stevenage museum proudly informs its punters. To be fair to the place it has been the origin of much of the guided weaponry used by HMF.

    in reply to: New British Medium Lift Helicopter #2444442
    pjhydro
    Participant

    Re the V-22: Without a rolling take-off that thing can’t even lift as much as a Blackhawk over any distance, but yet it weighs more than a CH-53 empty. And if it flies with external loads it’s not faster than a helicopter, since it flies with the engines at 45 degrees. And it can’t load 24 soldiers as said above, it can do between 15 (or a skinny 18). For the average flight deck it’s also too heavy and the engine exhausts are dangerously hot.

    I can believe it, the literature, and the chaps selling them at Farnborough and paris reckon it can carry 32 with the seats folded up, but they always talk guff. It always did look like a complicated idea. Often wonder how the Fairey Rotodyne would have faired operating in a similar role, probably a good decision to bury that all those years ago.

    in reply to: RN FSC – C1/C2 hull & armament proposals #2032164
    pjhydro
    Participant

    How about New Towns for a really inspirational set of names. HMS Stevenage, Harlow, Telford and the terrifying HMS Milton Keynes.

    I’m not sure cities work well any more, people just aren’t that proud of names like HMS Birmingham these days.

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 845 total)