Page 46 – Key Publishing

Dutchy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,123 total)

← 1 2 3 … 45 46 47 … 73 74 75 →

Author

Posts
January 1, 2004 at 2:01 pm in reply to: Happy New Year !!!! #2678257

Dutchy
Participant

Re: Happy New Year !!!!

Originally posted by PLA
The best wishes for 2004.

Cheers!!!!

From me too, have a jolly good year you all!

December 12, 2003 at 3:28 pm in reply to: General Discussion #374558

Dutchy
Participant

Re: Moore is a fraud and a liar

Originally posted by Sauron
If you needed more proof that Moore’s movies are a load of crap, take a look at the following.

http://bowlingfortruth.com/

There are other sites that detail facts about this Hollywood fraud and liar but this will give you the basics. Its revealing that even the title of his latest movie is based on a lie.

Sauron

Sauron,

The thinks mentioned on the website are quite beside the point. The movie is indeed about the phenonimon and I think he has got a fair point. The feeling I got from reading the website was that the writer had a cause to put M. Moore down, a NRA activist perhaps. If you attack only the details and not the big theme you are not really convincing in my view.

December 12, 2003 at 3:28 pm in reply to: Moore is a fraud and a liar #1960405

Dutchy
Participant

Re: Moore is a fraud and a liar

Originally posted by Sauron
If you needed more proof that Moore’s movies are a load of crap, take a look at the following.

http://bowlingfortruth.com/

There are other sites that detail facts about this Hollywood fraud and liar but this will give you the basics. Its revealing that even the title of his latest movie is based on a lie.

Sauron

Sauron,

The thinks mentioned on the website are quite beside the point. The movie is indeed about the phenonimon and I think he has got a fair point. The feeling I got from reading the website was that the writer had a cause to put M. Moore down, a NRA activist perhaps. If you attack only the details and not the big theme you are not really convincing in my view.

December 4, 2003 at 4:07 pm in reply to: Su-32 order #2695508

Dutchy
Participant

Originally posted by SOC
Because nobody wants a VIP transport with a 200 mile range 😀

lol

December 4, 2003 at 9:53 am in reply to: Su-32 order #2695641

Dutchy
Participant

Originally posted by haveblue
The Su-32 is rated for 7Gs. . . that’s the same as the F/A-18C/D.

It was originally Su-34 (Su-27IB) for the Russian Air Force – an strike fighter, Su-32FN for the Russian Navy – a maritime strike fighter, and Su-32 for the export market. . .

Now all three aircraft have been combined into a single multi-role fighter. . . the Su-32. . . only distinguising difference between the two is the nose cone’s shape, and tail boom of the Naval, and Air Force variants. The Naval variant has a thicker nose, a sona buoy ejector assembly, and MAD in the tail boom, making it larger again compared to the Air Force variant.

So in short, it is a bomber, CAS, fleet defence, fighter, ASW and a VIP (he it got sleeping arrangements, cookingspace and a tiolet so why not 😎 ) aircraft.

Why not do the same for the F/A18 E/F make something usefull out of it 😀

November 22, 2003 at 8:06 pm in reply to: General Discussion #380128

Dutchy
Participant

Only counting the successes, Like you should know (hopefully) one forget the loses pritty soon 😎 .

November 22, 2003 at 8:06 pm in reply to: 6-0 #1964466

Dutchy
Participant

Only counting the successes, Like you should know (hopefully) one forget the loses pritty soon 😎 .

November 22, 2003 at 4:47 pm in reply to: General Discussion #380188

Dutchy
Participant

Originally posted by Ren Frew
It was 6-1 though Jeroen.:D

?????????????????????

Look at this, or the official website might be wrong though 😀

click here

November 22, 2003 at 4:47 pm in reply to: 6-0 #1964517

Dutchy
Participant

Originally posted by Ren Frew
It was 6-1 though Jeroen.:D

?????????????????????

Look at this, or the official website might be wrong though 😀

click here

November 22, 2003 at 12:17 pm in reply to: General Discussion #380299

Dutchy
Participant

Yes, I have no words for it, It’ s …………… well……………… my live is complete now..

November 22, 2003 at 12:17 pm in reply to: England have won the Rugby World Cup! Yes! #1964606

Dutchy
Participant

Yes, I have no words for it, It’ s …………… well……………… my live is complete now..

November 21, 2003 at 2:28 pm in reply to: General Discussion #380530

Dutchy
Participant

Originally posted by Ren Frew
To get back to Dutchy’s point though…

I’m not convinced beating Scotland 6-1 is going to make you Euro champions ? Look at the drubbing France gave us in Paris ahead of the 2002 World Cup and how much they under performed once the tournament started proper.

If anything, soundly beating our national team ahead of a major tourney seems to bring a touch of complacency to the big contenders ?

Nah…. only joking, a team with the diverse mix and range of skilled players available such as Holland does should be more than capable of winning a tournament like Euro 2004. It’s going to take some determination and a little less arrogance on your part though, otherwise you might expect a few more 1-0’s at Hampden Park, a bit like Germany discovered when the original qualifying draws were made and they decided they had won the group already. 😉

well I have to agree with you on the first part 6-1 would not have confinced me either, but 6-0 on the otherhand does.:p

November 21, 2003 at 2:28 pm in reply to: 6-0 #1964804

Dutchy
Participant

Originally posted by Ren Frew
To get back to Dutchy’s point though…

I’m not convinced beating Scotland 6-1 is going to make you Euro champions ? Look at the drubbing France gave us in Paris ahead of the 2002 World Cup and how much they under performed once the tournament started proper.

If anything, soundly beating our national team ahead of a major tourney seems to bring a touch of complacency to the big contenders ?

Nah…. only joking, a team with the diverse mix and range of skilled players available such as Holland does should be more than capable of winning a tournament like Euro 2004. It’s going to take some determination and a little less arrogance on your part though, otherwise you might expect a few more 1-0’s at Hampden Park, a bit like Germany discovered when the original qualifying draws were made and they decided they had won the group already. 😉

well I have to agree with you on the first part 6-1 would not have confinced me either, but 6-0 on the otherhand does.:p

November 20, 2003 at 4:52 pm in reply to: General Discussion #380878

Dutchy
Participant

Well at least you can say you were beaten by the European Champion 😀 .

Last time we won the EC title, it was in 1988 and we weren’ t at the WC Mexico in 1986, just like we weren’ t in Korea. So you see the paralell here.

We had to play a play off in 1988 as well so again a paralell. Just a shame it isn’ t in Germany, just to give us an extra insentive 😉 .

Futhermore, it doesn’ t matter if you are up against the best in the first round, you have to beat them all anyway, so no problem there.

November 20, 2003 at 4:52 pm in reply to: 6-0 #1965040

Dutchy
Participant

Well at least you can say you were beaten by the European Champion 😀 .

Last time we won the EC title, it was in 1988 and we weren’ t at the WC Mexico in 1986, just like we weren’ t in Korea. So you see the paralell here.

We had to play a play off in 1988 as well so again a paralell. Just a shame it isn’ t in Germany, just to give us an extra insentive 😉 .

Futhermore, it doesn’ t matter if you are up against the best in the first round, you have to beat them all anyway, so no problem there.
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,123 total)

← 1 2 3 … 45 46 47 … 73 74 75 →