dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Sabrejet
    Participant

    …or put another way, a 10% survival rate. Better than some (to try and put a positive spin on a cr@ppy piece of news).

    in reply to: Messerschmitt – in Swindon? #795961
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Its way into its restoration Sabrejet

    Nice one – ta.

    in reply to: Messerschmitt – in Swindon? #796024
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Restoration or recreation? From the photos it looks like an intriguing artefact so would be a crime to lose it for the sake of another repro.

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    We seethe same issues in modern autos. The McLaren F1 is said to be the last analog supercar, likewise current F1 racers probably won’t be running a 100 years from now, unless the builders or future collector comes up with some clever computer work. Jim Clark’s Lotus has a better chance at operating in the future (alongside WWII aircraft) than digital autos half a century newer.

    Though off-topic, I’d have to disagree because it’s already being done: Dawn Treader managed to get a recent Penske restored and running, despite the fact that it comprised little more than a tub and an engine when they started. IIRC they managed to source and re-programme a lot of ECU-related stuff despite the “antiquated” computer language being long-lost. Likewise there are also very recent F1, Champ Car and even Group C cars running quite happily in private hands.

    I think we need to wind the clock back imagine what we’d have thought of the likelihood of privately-operated F-104s, F-4s, F-100s, Lightnings (the real one that is) and even a Vulcan if we’d considered the subject back in the 1960s. Even at that time the thought of hordes of reproduction Spitfires and Mustangs – Me-262s even would have seemed absurd, and even more so the thought of cottage industries manufacturing components to support the whole operation.

    So no, flying history will not stop at 1960, 1970 or whenever.

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    You can cross Sabre off that list now: the chances of seeing one in European skies pretty small and UK skies nil.

    I’m sure some Tucanos have made it onto the register though?

    in reply to: Swindon Area #796809
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I was lucky to go on one of their weekday open days a good few years ago: cracking collection and no-one around. Of course back in the day we were up there a great deal when the warbirds displays, Air Britain fly-ins, Sothebys auction etc were on. Favourite memory was sitting on the grass as BAe’s Mosquito taxied past, with its wingtip above our heads.

    What happened? Did we live through a golden era and only just realise it?

    in reply to: Swindon Area #797325
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Tony I’m staying in Wroughton but was told the SM collection is closed until March. So I have an invite there later in the year.

    Is anything visible outside ?

    No, sadly. Not since the RN Air Yard was open.

    Oh – some nice benches in Wroughton village: Barracuda, Blenheim + one other. Chip shop is worth the wait too 🙂

    in reply to: Swindon Area #797422
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Unless you’re very lucky, all you’ll see at Fairford is a runway. Good view mind 🙂

    Brize OK at either end of the runway, but I think you’ll soon get bored of A400M, Voyager and C-130Js.

    Kemble has food, variety, decent views and access.

    in reply to: Swindon Area #797476
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Kemble: nice café, good shots of the Gnat that’s parked by the tower and a Britannia easily-placed for photography too. Plus there are always airliners being scrapped, the possibility of something interesting visiting etc.

    in reply to: Work starts on the CL-44 Guppy #798846
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Utter BS of course: if the CL-44 is “dismantled” on site it is 100% the same as scrapping. We saw the same semantic claptrap used to describe the scrapping of one of the C-54s at North Weald.

    in reply to: Aircraft type ID please #799305
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    You will be hard-pushed to find this one by conventional means (local newspaper, RAFM Casualty Card, TNA WO339 record, TNA Unit records etc): if there was no crew injury then there will be little likelihood of an extant record. On occasion there might be a local newspaper mention or something in unit records (if they exist – but unlikely if it’s a Training Squadron).

    Of course that presupposes that you know the location of the crash to find the correct newspaper; or the correct unit to locate the right records to seek.

    I have a number of similar photos for this period, for which I know the home aerodrome but can still find no loss date/circumstances/crew names.

    It’s also possible that this DH.4/DH.9 was repaired, and therefore if there was no crew injury then there will be pretty much no likelihood of identifying it.

    in reply to: Aircraft type ID please #800008
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    DH.4/9 I think.

    in reply to: Old Sarum Centenary Airshow – 16/17 September #801233
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Looking forward to this: hopefully a good number of WW1 types represented too…?

    :applause:

    in reply to: First A380 into preservation! #804381
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    If they need any spare parts for the A340 they could get them here:
    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Etihad-Airways/Airbus-A340-642/1293784/L

    That one has long gone: scrapped soon afterwards and discretely disposed of.

    in reply to: First A380 into preservation! #804627
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I think an A350 is due to go on display (in Toulouse area, not airfield?) also.

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 1,675 total)