Lightning II.
Oh, wait…
Amusing off-topic thread.
But here’s a conundrum: Thunderbolt or Thunderbolt II? I’d say both.
Globemaster II.
Well this may be one instance where the sequel is better than the original (one notable exception being Godfather 2).
But only on the basis that it couldn’t be worse than the original!
True Grit – with Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon. MUCH better than the original.
Agreed in full. Now if the Coens did a Battle of Britain remake….. Well there’s a film I’d watch.
It’s widely believed that the Air Force was not happy with the prospect of a strategic bomber flying in civil hands…
They don’t seem to mind the B-29s.
In any case, how about XC-99 To The Sky?
There are already two currently flying, at least two passing through Avspecs at the moment, and plans for up to three others after that. We could well have seven flyers in a few years.
…and no Hornet, HP.42, Defiant, Barracuda, the list goes on.
Not very imaginative and I don’t really see the point. OK good luck to them, but why not something UNIQUE???
…or The People’s Hornet.
…or The People’s HP.42.
Both surely more worthwhile?
I’d suggest a trawl through local newspapers. Get a firm date and more info and the rest should be a lot easier.
See Aeroscopia in Toulouse for well-spaced exhibits. In their case, fewer is more!
I think the poster above didn’t read your request!
I last saw it at Henstridge, circa 1980 and I don’t think it flew much/at all after that.
Don’t those people lining up to go inside the Atlas realise it’s a one-way trip ? And what’s that cruise missile/stand-off bomb thingy in the foreground called ? looks like it’s ramjet powered.
Hounddog: x2 on some B-52s.
Not specifically this one, but I can give a related example:
The National Monuments Record Centre at Swindon holds an ‘RFC official’ aerial photo of an RFC aerodrome, donated/loaned by an individual who placed a ‘not to be copied’ clause on its loan. Now this is plainly daft, since the person who loaned this particular image doesn’t hold the copyright on it.
But NMRC is adamant that the image cannot be copied, and that is (was) that.
Luckily, in the meantime I found the same image in the RAF Museum archives, and thus I now have a copy. RAFM thankfully has a more sensible approach, with various levels of fee/restriction, depending on use of the image.
I suspect Garbett and Goulding were up against similar nonsense.
They won’t stay in good condition for long if they are.
I suspect he meant to write, “Hope they won’t…”.
I imagine they’ll go Stateside and be donated as memorials. Given ten years in the open and being vandalised, they’ll then be quietly scrapped. Sadly it has happened many times already, and just this year a rather nice T-33 has been donated in this fashion, to replace an older, vandalised aircraft of the same type.
But I may be wrong…
Hi All
My experience of the RAF Museum in the three times I’ve been…..
Arrived before 10 once, but the man in the gate just rolled his eyes and told me to “park over there…. with the others…. and move into the car park when it is 10am”. The following times I made sure to arrive after 10.
Visited the research section and all the stuff I ordered was waiting for me in a neat pile next to my seat, the staff bent over backwards to help, all are fascinated by the work they are doing. I photographed about 1000 pages of APs and other documents and pretty much as many again on the following visits.
Nice food in the restaurant.
I’ve never been charged the £6 for the photography, so the car parking was essentially free and a few pounds for access to as much as I could photograph in a day was amazing value.
Last visit they let me measure up the Leigh Light – that’s enabling me to accurately draw up the Stirling MkI FN25 dustbin.
Love all the exhibits too – great place – nice people.
James
Agreed in full, except for the daftness of opening at 10, and the carpark ditto: where’s the sense? No idea when the Duxford car park is open, but I’ve arrived at 8 o’clock before and was able to park there. It gives one a good feeling after a long drive!
And also agreed that the research staff at Hendon cannot be faulted. But I have a strong suspicion that they’re rather happy in their work. 🙂