dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,261 through 1,275 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rimowa to build new airworthy Junkers F 13 #854271
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I know there is/was a Ju-52 sponsored by Rimowa – just for a second there I thought they were going to be building new Tante Ju’s!!!! 😀

    Never say ‘never’!

    🙂

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #854279
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    No I didn’t! 😀

    Just my dry sense of humour. I do not know whether you live in Essex or not. 😉 no offence meant.

    Aha! None taken. And no – I’m a bit further west.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #854403
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Yes I call it the Vulcan effect as I have noticed many, shall we call them people, jump up and leave to get back to Essex after 558 or the Reds. This nicely clears the crowd line and the traffic jams before I am told to leave at closing time to get back to Tunbridge Wells. Personally I’m discusted at such behaviour as it shows disrespect to following displays.:D:D

    You misunderstand me: I leave before the Red Arrows start! I’d never leave before 558!

    in reply to: Rimowa to build new airworthy Junkers F 13 #854409
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Very impressive: beats the cr@p out of yet more Spitfires!

    :love-struck:

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #854432
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    There have been some interesting ideas put forward here and some may yet interest a book publisher. Others look a little too technical for that and would be too long for a magazine article, but there is a third way providing the author(s) does not expect to make any money, and that is to pull the material together and place it on the web. I was thinking of something along the lines of …
    http://www.hydroretro.net/etudegh/index.php
    The issue of where to host the documents can be addressed later, it would not necessarily require a dedicated website.
    A second thought is to carry out the research via the writing equivalent of crowd funding; someone acts as the focal point and others contribute their material and expertise, of which there is plenty on this forum. The ideas posted above on metal strip construction and aviation fuel supply would appear to be ideal candidates for such an approach, provided someone with sufficient interest (the OPs?) acts as a catalyst.

    An interesting site: I had previously put together some research on the North American XP-86, which I suspect would be too in-depth for most magazines, but too short for inclusion in a book. So is there an English-language equivalent of this website?

    In my experience, one rarely makes money out of a book if it’s done properly! I also suspect it’s why a number of ‘career’ authors resort to extensive plagiarism.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #854586
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    For the general but interested public who comprise the majority of spectators I suppose the Red Arrows will continue to be a draw.

    And long may they do so: many’s the time I’ve thanked them for a quick exit out of the carpark at an airshow.

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Hello
    Justing wondering if any body can help me with more information on the loss of the above plane and pilot you later died.The net and books say about the pilots history but I can find no information on his plane that day or the pilot of the Bf109 which shot him down.Thank you for any leads or information.

    Anything in the squadron ORB?

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #855105
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Expect a huge and glossy book on the Short Stirling soon!

    Not exactly a gap-filler though.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #855305
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Now if we want to talk air displays how about Biggin Hill and Farnborough back in the 60’s and 70’s now they WERE air shows. I suppose you should consider yourself lucky if you are too young and therefore have nothing to compare today’s shows with. (And yes I know never end a sentence with with, but then they probably no longer teach that anyway)

    Not a patch on Hendon 1930.

    Bah humbug etc etc…

    Said with tongue firmly in cheek!

    We need to enjoy what we’ve got methinks.

    😀

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #855312
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I think it’s entirely fair. When one judges the event against the Greenham Common days and the early Fairford shows, it was pretty dull. Maybe those who are too young to have seen anything better might have been impressed, but as an IAT it was “okay” at best. I can’t see any reason to mention Spitfire/Typhoon, Blenheim, Red Arrows – they’re common to lots of display venues. Admittedly the Vulcan is too but as I said previously, I think most of us were expecting to be unimpressed by the Vulcan display based on past experience. I can’t imagine how RIAT will be able to make next year’s show any better or even as good. From what I hear, I think there are hopes of an F-35 but I doubt if that will thrill anyone other than the youngsters – it’s not like it isn’t going to be around for a long, long time! As we all know, the UK air show scene is already in a parlous state, and the Vulcan’s departure isn’t going to make things any better.

    As one who attended most of the Greenham IAT’s and a fair few of the Fairford ones, I’d say it was very good. We’re never going to get ANG KC-97s, Canadair Argus, RAN S-2 Trackers, inverted Lightning passes, Fulton Recovery demos, multiple F-104 aerobatic teams, Tu-95s or countless other gems from the past, but surely that’s the point? We move on and today’s gems will be added to the list of those in the “It’s not like it used to be” pile.

    For me the Japanese attendance was enough to warrant the admission fee alone. Then there were the six Hurricanes, the F-5s, the Su-22, the Spanish Aguila team (rarely seen these days and a boon in Friday’s static), Mirage 2000s and a good few others. OK there were no Flankers, but the likelihood of seeing many of those for the forseeable future is pretty low. I guess we could have had a B-2, a B-52 or a B-1 but for me there were no obvious gaps and it felt like a good show, and though the A400M will undoubtedly become a common sight in the next few years, I doubt we’ll ever see a better routine done than at this year’s show.

    But I bet next year’s won’t be as good….

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #855370
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    If anyone has a book idea, please do get in touch: [email]j.slater@fonthillmedia.com[/email]

    Expect a huge and glossy book on the Short Stirling soon!

    With very best wishes,

    Jay

    See Post #24: been there, done it!

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #855583
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Sitting Ducks & Peeping Toms: Targets, Drones and UAVs in British Military Service Since 1917

    https://www.air-britain.co.uk/actbooks/acatalog/Sitting-Ducks—Peeping-Toms-269.html

    USN, USAF etc. not covered in this book!

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #856164
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Well, unless I’ve been exceptionally lucky, I think it all comes down to the content and quality of your initial approach. A good pitch, thinking about what they would like to hear, with examples of illustrations and other goodies appears to work. It also helps if you have actually written most of it rather than waiting for the go ahead. Judging by your obvious knowledge on aviation subjects, from posts here and elsewhere, I would be surprised if you failed to get a publisher interested.

    Agreed. But it’s more difficult than it used to be. Spitfires and WW2 sell, and anything outside of that is a ‘risk’. In my experience anyway. Publishers are less willing to take that risk than they used to be. I was lucky but I still have one project that missed the cut (post-financial crisis).

    in reply to: Hurricane special at RIAT 2015 #856453
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Why do people see it as a ‘waste’ to have a hurricane in static when there are already 5 flying? Surely 5 in the air and 1 on the ground that people can see up close it better than 6 in the air that people can only see from a distance? Each to their own I guess but I thought it was great to see the Hurricane and Spitfire together in the static.

    All six were in the static and visible up close on Friday at least.

    in reply to: Gaps in our Aviation Research. #856460
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    …and if it ran to 200+ pages and/or fully in-depth, I’d buy anyone’s attempt at doing the HP.42/45.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,261 through 1,275 (of 1,675 total)