Yet overseas aid frequently involves the armed forces, both in responding to disasters and development projects (eg working parties from ships visiting developing nations).
Crazy!
Did I kill the thread?
And what if its EMCON silent?
The two tier usage is my idea also, but my idea is the first tier will use passive sensors primarily that will spot E2 Hawkaye from a very long distance, giving a rough idea where to look closer, then send in 1-2 to switch on the search radar where the Carrier is believed to be located, preferably armed with an AMRAAM to take out a Hawkeye that gets close enough to spot the UAV.
I think the same platform can be used, but modified with emphasis on sensors vs weapon load depending on mission.
Okay so the first UAV/aircraft detects the Hawkeye by passive means (ESM), then communicates this to the second which is meant to approach the carrier group and use its search radar with being detected…..?
Well at least the galley works.
Also see my PM.
RN harmony rules are upto 660 days away from your homeport in a 36 month period, ie 220 days (about seven months) per year.
But a really Stealthy UAV will have problems finding the carrier, or any other ship since being stealthy is going to limit radar use.
Additionally the carrier group can go EMCON silent ….. so it cannot be detected from the group’s own radars.
The traditional approach is to deal with the lauching platform. I’ve just noticed who those articles were written by, well he doesn’t have an agenda at all, does he?
The author seems to be unaware that missile armed aircraft and ships can be engaged, and actually that’s one of the reasons for having carriers, to defend other ships, unless you intended to have no maritime presence and surrender control of the sea to whoever.
That’s your view. The US Navy does not share it.
If only the force levels and procurements of the SDR in 1998 had been maintained….
Five RAF air defence sqaudrons
21 Nimrod MRA4
40 Infantry battalions
32 frigates/destroyers
10 SSNs
Sea Harrier kept in service until CVF/JCA arrives (very tempting to slip in this link to the PPRuNe Sea Jet thread*)
CVF in service in 2012 (and 2015)
Bah…
* Also mentions frigate/destroyer and submarine cuts.
Good to hear that the concept of “design for maintainability” was understood by the designers.
Anyone ever seen a picture of an Intruder with Sidewinders? Hang on, I’ve found one:
Thanks.
Back on topic, a recent conversation with an ex USN flyer revealed that both the A6 Intruder and A7 Corsair II could carry Sidewinders. WWII experience led to a desire to get as many aircraft airborne as possible – and try to give them an air to air role.
See the last page of Ark Royal landings – ARRSE
During the Cold War, both the A-7 Corsair II and A-6 Intruder could carry and launch AIM-9 Sidewinders. In an attack there was a desire to clear as many aircraft from the deck as possible (think Midway), so there was a general thought to employ those aircraft in an air-to-air role. Couple of problems: A-7/A-6 not equipped with an air-to-air radar, so needed close control for visual pickup. Sidewinder couldn’t work against the incoming missiles. They couldn’t get far enough out in time to work against the Badgers/Bears etc and we all know it much better to kill the archers, not the arrows. They were used for escort duties after a fighter properly intercepted the incoming Soviet aircraft (little problem with F-14A availability) and the Soviet aircraft wanted to wander around the battle group taking pictures to prove they had found the group at sea. More often than not the A-7/A-6 were configured as tankers to try and keep or limited F-14’s airborne.
With A6 and A7 being replaced by Hornet/Super Hornet (and the EA6B soon being replaced by a version of Super Hornet) all the embarked jets will be capable of air defence of the fleet.
I agree that in a crisis all sorts of things can be done much faster than normal (cf my comments (and links) above and elsewhere aboat Sea Harriers stored or at the Culdrose dummy deck*), however, Invincible has been largely cannibalised to keep Illustrious and Ark Royal going.
Unfortunately this is now common across the fleet, with nagative effects on readiness and the ability of suppliers to produce spares and components in a hurry, and yes, it has cost jobs.