You made a nice job of that Mike, have you started on the launch ramp yet?
Expecting you to delete the second post on the subject, I have copied and pasted it onto my FB page; I find your position on the subject objectionable to say the least.
“None of us is perfect”
sorry couldn’t resist.
Immediate restrictions on air shows just announced; no “high energy” aerobatics.
Labour MP from Manchester has called for all displays to take place over the sea; he obviously hasn’t seen the floatilla of boats moored along the display line at such events, nor has he grasped that placing the A/C so far away from the public to assure their safety, will almost certainly mean that the display wont be seen by anyone.
I think it is more bureaucracy from what I understand, indeed I think that the fund raising has stopped until the local council can agree on a plan,; as an aside the fundraising event is held at Keele college, which was set up (in part) by RJ Mitchells brother, who up until certain events at the Schneider trophy races was the most famous of the Mitchell clan!
I am aware of the connection between the spitfire and Stoke on Trent, indeed Supermarine’s address is Mitchell place, but my understanding is that it is completely out of place, within it’s current environment, “looked after” by a curator with very little interest, I would suggest it deserves better, but am also aware of the changes in and around the area, and must concede that for many residents, it has little importance.
Can’t answer your question regarding the condition it will be restored to ,but Mark at Supermarine has been working on this A/C for over 10 years off and on, and is actively involved in the fund raising to finance the work to be done; I suppose the real question is what is the spitfire doing in a pottery museum?
Look good?
Many thanks guys for your continued support of the project; good to see your own project moving on Robert, indeed you would have more space if you didn’t keep making bits of aeroplane! yes that bit of the wing is complicated, you have the curve of the wing plus the dihedral, if you can do that bit I think you can do any of it.
Tom, whilst not adverse to modern manufacturing methods, I don’t have a clue about cad, but can see the attraction of laser cutting or water jetting or even 3d printing even if it is as you say used for a total loss casting; I don’t however have access to any of those tools, and literally everything I make is with a hammer, a hacksaw, and a box of files (metal ones not computer ones!)
TT I think they said it shouldn’t be done and specifically I shouldn’t be the one to do it!
TJ yes that is the aces high C119, hopefully about to come out of the barn for a bit of a tidy up.
I don’t often post the same piccys on here as I do FB, but for me at least this something of a monumental achievement, having started the process 6 years ago, by making the spar sections and the face plates. and then 3 years later part completing the STBD section, the last year making ribs 1 & 5 to 3 weeks ago where I finished off the ribs, completely dismantled the STBD to copy for the Port side, and then assembling both sections. This to me is proof that it is possible to re start work from years ago, and still enjoy it, however hard it is at first, having to relearn where everything goes, and what tools are best for what, etc, etc I will probably skin these 2 sections first and then start on the nose ribs; ribs 2 & 3 will be the hardest as they fix on and around the casting/forging that supports the U/C pintles.




“It’s demise would be a very sad memorial to those who started it back in 1984 – wonderful people such as the RAF’s ACM Sir Neil Wheeler, AVM Johnnie Johnson, ACM Sir Christopher Foxley – Norris and Founder David Green. Then there were Supermariner’s including Jeffrey Quill, Alex Henshaw, Gerry Gingell *and many other ‘Spitfire names’ from before WW2 and up to today. Surely it is too precious just to dismiss it?”
I would certainly agree with that statement, but also remember the issues mentioned by Mike J; perhaps a complete sweep, or else a reimagined “society” that is untarnished.
I’ve got some space!
If you go on the AeroWeb site under the museum you will find the details of the engineer who looked after her for the last ten years of her flying life .
Regards the C-119 -she was the third in U.S military service -be nice if she found a home somewhere !
As you say a great shame, and best wishes for both pilots; it does at least answer the (often posed) question “why do air crashes always come in threes?”
They don’t; crashes ocurr all the time, just not reported.
With a cast list like that, it should have been a television programme.