dark light

stuart gowans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,986 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Vampire T11 wing dimensions #851960
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Hi Elliot is it for the purpose of moving them? I don’t have exact dimensions but seem to recall the root being 11ft (ish) and the length about 16ft (ish) they fit neatly on a 16ft car trailer.

    stuart gowans
    Participant

    This probably means that they don’t bother to check anything, instead passing on the responsibility of “policing” their business to the individuals that use it; when I report (usually blatant fraud) the narrow list of options available (as to quite how the item breaks ebay rules) usually doesn’t cater for;

    ” complete scumbag who has set up a bogus account purely for the purpose of stealing money and/or personal details, using a hacked photo and description from a legitimate seller”

    in reply to: The MIA thread 2014 #858942
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    “I didn’t feel at all embarrassed !”

    Good for you; but I suggest the reason that this forum is better than many others out there, isn’t because we have people within our membership who’s ability for sarcasm and inventive personal attacks, is on a whole different level, but has more to do with the knowledge that is shared ( however frustrating it maybe not to have the whole picture) and I for one thought it was sad to see former friends at each others throats.

    in reply to: The MIA thread 2014 #859057
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Perhaps we could all make an effort to get along? sarcasm is a brilliant invention (and I make use of it daily) but I have found on the internet it doesn’t always come across as light heartedness, and of course some times it isn’t meant to…

    Many of the forum members that frequented these pages 10 years ago no longer visit, some never will come back, others (like me) drift back hoping things have changed; for me they have, and this forum is, (in my own opinion, I hasten to add) the best of the rest, and it would be a great shame if it descended into the depths that was the Burma thread, which frankly became an embarrassment.

    in reply to: Rare Engine+Brand New Airframe #863617
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    “The Merlin’s on the Hornet are rare though as they are a special streamlined version (unique block). IIRC only about 10 are known to to exist”

    I’ve always been interested in this, as it has often been quoted as such, but there isn’t much meat to trim off the outside of a Merlin, before you get to the inside!

    Bill Gunston quotes the first Merlins as having 60hp per sq ft of frontal area, and for the Hornet a figure of 340 hp per sq ft frontal area, clearly a huge difference but was that achieved by streamlining the block (as opposed to moving ancillaries rearward) and given that one of the Hornet engines counter rotates, achieved by an idler gear (for want of a better description) in the reduction gear train, wouldn’t the resultant bulge in the casing, (similar perhaps to the Coffman start types) make the frontal area greater?

    in reply to: Full scale Allison powered Spitfire on its way #866022
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    It has been said before, but perhaps worth reiterating; “you build what you want to build, and let others build what they want”

    Just in the same way that Richard Branson has been berated for not single handedly saving all of the world’s endangered aircraft, it is expected that anyone embarking on a build project must only concentrate on either an extinct type or else one that is virtually so.

    Many of these projects fall by the wayside, but this one does seem like it will go all the way; with regards to the “ad blurb” I’m sure that no slur to Supermarine or the British nation as a whole was intended, most likely performance at low level would be better given that almost certainly it will be unarmed and that instruments and comms will most likely be of the modern variety (anyone who has ever felt the weight of a Spitfire panel fully loaded, will know just how heavy they are as well as that radiogram size radio)

    in reply to: Full scale Allison powered Spitfire on its way #867152
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Is there one of these flying? I only ask because the build on Russ’s webpage appears to show the prototype still under construction; from what I can remember he has been working on this for well over ten years, top marks for persistence, and I hope he gets there (if he hasn’t already!)

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects Part 2 #871190
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Looks a nice strong trailer, however you can have a blow out, or lose a wheel on a four wheeler and keep it sunny side up; a trick not recommended with two wheel trailers….

    in reply to: RIP Hiroo Onoda, your war was a long one, #871538
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I think I know what you mean! I didn’t mean the Atomic bomb as a specific weapon, as I’m sure the vast majority of Japan neither knew it was Atomic or even understood that concept, but it must have been pretty obvious after the second drop they would either have to surrender or else cease to exist.

    in reply to: RIP Hiroo Onoda, your war was a long one, #871828
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I think it might have something to do with the fact that post war Japan to him was 1974! it’s only obvious that the country had changed by then; I think as a Japanese if you had experienced the atomic bomb (s) everything had to change; if he had held out for just a bit longer he would have missed the cold war entirely!

    in reply to: RIP Hiroo Onoda, your war was a long one, #871947
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    “Japan’s philosophy and ideas changed dramatically after World War II,” Onoda told ABC. “That philosophy clashed with mine so I went to live in Brazil”.

    Quite a telling sentence……

    in reply to: RAF Wethersfield F100 Crash 1963 #875923
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Project-9699 PM sent; didn’t see the attachment you sent until after! Sugar lane is opposite the entrance to our farm, and the field in question looks to be the one at this end with the wood roughly in line with the runway approach; I’ve always wondered if Finches farm (house) was occupied during the active days of the airfield, as it is squarely in line with the runway approach!

    in reply to: RAF Wethersfield F100 Crash 1963 #877729
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Having read the details of the ’57 crash on the Wethersfield facebook, and had a walk down the field, it looks very much like the tree that the Super sabre struck is just past our boundary, (that corner of the field was sold off to a neighbour at the same time we bought the property) the Grimwoods only removed the runway marker poles (from their land) last year, and said tree is the tallest and nearest to that line.

    It would appear that although they got the era wrong, there was sadly more truth than myth to this particular story, they did say that nothing grew in that part of the field for years after, because of the fuel contamination.

    Do you happen to know the actual date of the crash?

    in reply to: RAF Wethersfield F100 Crash 1963 #877977
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    “I rather get the impression that the F100 was a bit like the Luftwaffe’s F104s – want a jet fighter? Just buy a field, and you’ll get a jet in it before long”.

    I’ve got a field on the end of the eastern approach , apparently they did have something crash in there during the war, not sure what though as details are a bit sketchy, nothing flying out of there now, not even the gliders this year.

    in reply to: HMS Eagle Aircraft 1957 #878132
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    The cockpit of which is now owned by the forums very own “HMS Vulture” !

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,986 total)