dark light

hawkdriver05

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: HMS Victorious #2039539
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Shame there was never a naval Mirage F.1

    in reply to: RN Fighters #2039542
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Why no “Sea Grippen”?

    in reply to: RN Fighters #2040333
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Agreed! Makes ALOT more sense to buy super bugs or Rafaels than to develope essentialy a whole new a/c.

    in reply to: RN Fighters #2040347
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    The F-35 is nice lookin….but……I just cant see it happening. Lord I do hope Im wrong tho………

    in reply to: HMS Victorious #2040373
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Sadly the carrier at yeovilton will probably be the nearest any of us will get to a RN ctol carrier for the forseeable future. Oh and here is that ‘S mk3’ Bucc in 801 colours! BTW if you get your hands on this months Navy News there is a deck by deck cutaway of Ark Royal IV, showing just how 2700 sailors could be fitted into a ship that size!

    I always thought the MOD/government in general would not allow Ark Royal to be preserved because they saw her as an embarrassment (ie because they were getting rid of CTOL naval aviation) and thought the sooner she was gone the sooner everyone would forget about the whole carrier crisis and the ‘end of empire’. On the other hand, when the Falklands were invaded, Admiral Leach briefed Margaret Thatcher about the Task Force he was assembling, and after telling her that Hermes and Invincible would be sent along with all the Sea Harriers available, she apparently replied “And you’ll be sending the Ark Royal with her Phantoms and Buccaneers of course?”, only to be told that her government had scrapped the Ark Royal 18 months earlier, and the Phantoms and Buccaneers were now effectively impotent in the hands of the land based RAF. Lessons of history…

    Lessons of history?! Now you.ve done it! Certain posters here dont believe in that! Prepare for PARAGRAPHS of why you are just wrong and “history” means nothing!n

    in reply to: HMS Victorious #2040377
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Visited the Midway last August. WONDERFUL experience! Now……..were the 3in AA guns on Vicky the only mounts of their type in the RN? I see Tiger and Blake had 3in guns, but the mounts seem different.

    in reply to: RN Fighters #2040530
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Whats wrong with “hun”?

    in reply to: Colossus/Majestic class #2040908
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    My fav was allways 25 de Mayo….with Melbourne a VERY close second.

    in reply to: Colossus/Majestic class #2041273
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    It allways seemed strange to me, the decision to fit low powered machinery in them thus giving them only 24/25 knt top speed. Not enough for fleet work. What was the thinking behind this?

    in reply to: HMS Victorious #2041612
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    I understand one of the big cpmplaints bout the ww2 Illustrious class was hanger height. What was it on Vicky after rebuild?

    in reply to: HMS Victorious #2042341
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    The Victorious plan drawing was scanned from a bokk called ‘Royal Navy Aircraft Carriers 1945-1990’ by Leo Marriott, and the drawing is on page 73. Also there is a similar one for CVA-01 on page 79 which I have ‘coloured in’ and included below. Also some other pics from the archives, including Hermes, Eagle, Ark and my take on the F-35B colour scheme!

    Very nice seeing the F-35s in RN markings…..makes you think what might have been…….shame really.

    in reply to: HMS Victorious #2042730
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    If Argentina had bought Victorious…….would have been EXSPENSIVE for them to keep her and her air group up.

    in reply to: what ship? #2042731
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    FT Drum today.

    in reply to: what ship? #2042855
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Ummm… Fort Drum?

    Correct!

    in reply to: RN Fighters #2047678
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Falkalnd were just an example. What i want to ask is how long will it need to have SHAR’s back in case of emergency?
    Not sure AV-8B+ solution will work. They are not exactly the same of a GR9 and is not sure USA will give you the planes.

    Not exactly the same for sure….but much easier for a pilot to convert to AV-8B+ from GR.9 than to SHAR

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,012 total)