dark light

hawkdriver05

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,012 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: No Turboprop fighters after the Wyvern S-4 #2630395
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Didn’t the Wyvern see action only once? At Suez?

    in reply to: Cheap DDH? #2044625
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Why the twin islands on the CVF design? Seems like a horrible waste of deck space to me…………

    in reply to: F/A-18E/F Question #2631891
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    There’s a company around here that flies Kfir C.2s (ATACS) as adversaries under contract for the Air Force and Navy……they have a couple of Drakens also…..I’v always thought they should try to buy a few MIG-29s (Fulcrum As) from Russia,…….I’m sure Russia has more than a few just sitting in fields someplace…….

    in reply to: KC767A #2631963
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    So the last non US design we gonna have is the EH 101? What a stupid policy………I would love to see the EH 101 bought in MUCH greater numbers………the Marines should have it instead of the V-22 Deathtrap….

    in reply to: F/A-18E/F Question #2631966
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Will they be developing a twin seat VSTOL F-35?

    in reply to: KC767A #2632154
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    My vote is for Dreamtanker!

    in reply to: F/A-18E/F Question #2632156
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    The US Navy should buy Rafale……….MUCH better looking than the Super Mistake I mean Hornet……

    in reply to: RAF may convert Nimrods into bombers #2632161
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    I guess it could carrry JDAMs and storm shadow…….but does the RAF have the money for this?

    in reply to: No Turboprop fighters after the Wyvern S-4 #2632410
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Was the Wyvern a fighter or a strike aircraft? The only other turboprop attack plane I can think of (that was actualy used in combat ) is the Pucara…….

    in reply to: F/A-18E/F Question #2632416
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    A couple of Marine squadrons (VFF[AW]224, 332, 533, 121, 225, and 242) fly the F-18D model exclusivly. They are used in the “all weather” attack role (supposedly replaced the A-6………rather poorly) with the rear cockpit set up as a weapon systems operators station…..

    in reply to: Cheap DDH? #2044969
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    I don’t think the US Navy could bring themselves to build an austere platform…….now they talking bout a 14000 ton 6in gun armed “DESTROYER”!

    in reply to: Cheap DDH? #2045089
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    I don’t think anyone can build a “cheap” warship anymore……..

    in reply to: Invincible class CVL future #2045092
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Brazil doesn’t seem to have a navy designed to operate a carrier…..I mean, does she even have an air defence destroyer?

    in reply to: US Denies French Fighters Emergency Landing Rights #2632965
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Air National Guard units are usualy at civilian airports…..

    in reply to: Invincible class CVL future #2045181
    hawkdriver05
    Participant

    Well….if any country DOES end up with them, there’s just so many aircraft types that could operate off them……..so….more expense to buy the Harriers..

Viewing 15 posts - 856 through 870 (of 1,012 total)