dark light

Vympel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,357 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Some Flanker Doubts #2574635
    Vympel
    Participant

    So the real thing may not enter service before 2016.

    If you assume that what’s true for American procurement applies to everyone else, when that’s not necessarily true. For example, the first avionics fit for the T-50 is actually being first deployed on the Su-35BM (“4++” generation). So the first T-50s will be, all told, “5-” generation rather than the full “5”. I assume it’ll only be the full “5” that’s equipped with an AESA/AFAR radar and other features, though “sensor fusion”, helmet display, and entirely glass cockpit (no analog instruments at all) are already planned for the Su-35BM.

    in reply to: Some Flanker Doubts #2574739
    Vympel
    Participant

    When had the F-22 (YF-22) and F-35 (YF-35) their first flights and saw or will see service entry?!

    The YF-22 and X-35 (no such thing as a YF-35) were purely concept demonstration aircraft designed, built and flown for competition purposes to decide who would win the contract (vs the YF-23 and X-32)- they’re not very relevant to development of the full aircraft per se. The “true” F-22 first flew in 1997. The “true” F-35 has yet to fly, though it will sometime this year.

    The T-50 is by all accounts in wind tunnel tests.

    in reply to: Some Flanker Doubts #2574827
    Vympel
    Participant

    For first flight or service entry?

    I’d say service entry in 2012 is a bit unrealistic.

    Probably right. Good thing I said “at the earliest”. 🙂 On the other hand, first flight is expected in 2008, but who knows if that might happen.

    Look at even the time simpler aircraft like the FC-1 need to be taken into service. The Russians flying the PAK-FA and getting it into service in 6 years is insanely optimistic.

    Well, the Russians aren’t the Chinese- the Chinese have far less experience and steady funding, wheras the Russians are the opposite.

    in reply to: Russian Air Force in deep crisis #2574836
    Vympel
    Participant

    A mere 40 new helicopters by 2015? That’s still rather pathetic. By 2015 the average Russian helicopter will be more than 30 years old! 40 new helos when you have a couple of thousnad of machines that need replacing is a mere drop of water in an ocean!

    Yeah, it’s very frustrating. I don’t know why they bother to announce such things, it really sucks.

    I’m also curious as to what the progress is of the Ka-60 and Mi-38. I would’ve thought they’d be making progress to replacing the Mi-8M with a mix of the Ka-60 and Mi-38 but nothing’s been happening- instead they’re getting Mi-8MTV-5s, which are like super-upgraded new Mi-8Ms.

    in reply to: Some Flanker Doubts #2574875
    Vympel
    Participant

    How many Su-27SMs are in service today in the RuAF?

    The first five aicraft were delivered to the AF back in December 2003 (sort of a Christmas present.

    The plan was then for 11 aircraft to be upgraded in 2005 (I don’t know if any were upgraded in 2004) and for 6 to be upgraded in 2006, but what really happened was that all 17 were upgraded in 2005.

    So at this stage there’s at least 22 aircraft, possibly more.

    Kommersant- about the 17 Su-27SMs in 2005

    As for the PAK FA, I have no idea. My money’s on 2012 at the earliest.

    in reply to: Russian Air Force in deep crisis #2574882
    Vympel
    Participant

    What were the 30 new aircraft acquired in 2005? Helicopters or planes? I read something about Russia acquiring some Mi-8MTV-5s (Mi-17MDs) a week or so ago.

    Also, yes, by law, the Russians don’t spend any money on the military whatsoever outside of Russian firms. No foreign anything, all 100% Russian. The only possible exception is relations with former critical industries in Ukraine- I think they recently signed an agreement of cooperation to help extend the life of the SS-18.

    Here’s the article about Mi-8MTV-5s:

    Five Mi-24PN Helicopters to Reach Russia’s Army Aviation Units This Year

    Five Mi-24PN helicopters will be accepted into the inventory this year by army aviation units, and before 2015, a total of 40 of the new helicopters will reach the troops, including the Mi-28, Mi-24PN and Mi-8TV-5, the Russian Federation air force chief of army aviation, Viktor Ivanov, announced while at the 344th Combat Application and Cross-Training of Army Aviation Flight Crew Center in Torzhok. The new Mi-24PN will be sent to the North Caucuses military district, the general reported.

    According to him, afterwards helicopters of this type will reach other military districts, too, all the way to the Far Eastern. They upgraded Mi-24PN (cannon, night) ((PUSHECHNYY, NOCHNOY)) combat assault helicopters are equipped with the “Raduga-III” observation and targeting system, which is combined with the “Zarevo” thermal imager.

    Included in the targeting system are a television channel and laser range finder, an optical-mechanical direction finder package, and also a stabilization system. This equipment provides detection and identification of targets at night time and firing both with guided missiles and with unguided types of weapon.

    Source: 18.04.06, ARMS-TASS

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2055676
    Vympel
    Participant

    Presumably, he means the Project 667BDRMs to be equipped with the new “Sineva” variant of the SS-N-23, while the first Project 955s will enter service with “Bulavas”, along with the Dmitry Donskoi and possibly the Severstal and Arkhangelsk.

    Considering it’s 2006, 5 years for this should be quite achievable.

    in reply to: Baranovichi (Belarus) 61 Fighters Airbase #2577604
    Vympel
    Participant

    I assume those MiG-29s are Belarussian upgraded MiG-29BMs.

    Vympel
    Participant

    I don’t see the Ukranian military switching to Western fighters- the fact that they inherited some of the Soviet Union’s military industrial complex (although none in the aviation sector except for Antonov) and are much closer to the USSR than the few Warsaw Pact client states that have “gone West” would probably mean the military would scoff at using Western fighters of any type.

    If they were smart, they’d upgrade- Su-24M2, Su-27SM, Su-25SM/Su-25UBM, MiG-29SMT, etc. It’d be cheaper and it’d work. Perhaps go with the MiG-29M1/M2, Su-34 and/or the Su-35BM in the longer term.

    in reply to: Mainstay & Maxdome #2578992
    Vympel
    Participant

    Actually I’ve heard the A-50 and A-50U are superior to the E-3 Sentry in some respects- in any event, it is certainly not grossly inferior to the E-3.

    One point of complaint was that the amenities for the crew on the A-50 aren’t nearly as good as they were on the previous (and by all accounts, uselss) AEW&C for the Soviet Union, the MOSS. Not as comfortable, because the MOSS was converted from an airliner and the A-50 is from a cargo plane.

    I heard the Tu-204 might be a replacement for the A-50, when they feel the need. Which will be a while from now I think.

    in reply to: Two Tu-160s this year #2586153
    Vympel
    Participant

    Two Tu-160 Bombers to Reach Long-Range Air Force Inventory

    Two Tu-160 strategic bombers will reach the inventory of Russia’s long-range air force before year’s end, the commander of the country’s long-range aviation, Igor’ Khvorov, reported to journalists.

    “We will accept the first airplane from the industry after the May holidays, and in the second half of the year a second airplane also will be ready,” Khvorov said.

    According to him, both airplanes will be essentially upgraded. In particular, besides cruise missiles, they will be able to destroy targets with the aid of aerial bombs.

    “The circle of missions for the combat application of these airplanes is being expanded appreciably,” Khvorov noted.

    The new airplanes will have the capability to use communications via space satellites and possess improved characteristics of aimed fire delivery.

    The commander noted that several dozen changes have been introduced into the design of the airplanes in comparison with the series-built examples, and he added that the second airplane will be subject to deep upgrade.

    Source: 24.04.06, RIA Novosti

    So, the deep upgrade for the second aircraft is confirmed. All makes sense now.

    in reply to: F-22 jammed canopy #2586453
    Vympel
    Participant

    If POGO saw a guy out there with a bottle of Windex cleaning the canopy they’d launch into their anti-F-22 rhetoric about how it must be inferior if you need something like Windex to keep it operational :rolleyes: They’re about the biggest bunch of dumba$$es I’ve ever seen. They claim they’re just looking out for government waste but what they don’t tell you is that in their eyes if it’s a weapon it’s a waste. :rolleyes:

    In a word: ********. It’s clearly a humorous website entry and it’s a fact that the F-22A was a grossly mismanaged and wasteful program. Just because they got a working aircraft out of it sometime this century doesn’t somehow make it all better. Can you say Commanche?

    in reply to: YF-12/A-12/SR-71/MIG 25/MiG 31 thread #2587902
    Vympel
    Participant

    the Vympel R-37 missile, the latter of which was a follow-on to the R-33 and was developed for the now-abandoned modernization of the Mikoyan MiG-31 interceptor

    Just a comment- the article referring to the “now-abandoned modernization of the Mikoyan MiG-31 interceptor” is obviously referring to the MiG-31M, rather than the MiG-31BM.

    in reply to: This is the Su-35 #2588199
    Vympel
    Participant

    I was under impression that work on KS-172 was cancelled?

    No, we just never heard anything about it for a long time. Then it appears out of nowhere on the Su-35BM model 🙂

    in reply to: Two Tu-160s this year #2588201
    Vympel
    Participant

    No – it has fighter-style control columns………

    You are not confusing the red-painted K-36 ejection seat firing handles with the control columns are you??

    Here is a closer look …….

    Admittedly, the tops of the control columns are a tad oversized – but they are not double-spade type grips, they are fighter-style.

    Once its all closed up, you can’t see much of the cockpit anyway…..

    Ken

    Nah, it’s just the huge oversize that got me- there’s no way they’re that big in real life, so I assumed from the shot they were the big double handers. 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,357 total)