dark light

Vympel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,357 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hypervelocity missiles question #2059691
    Vympel
    Participant

    LOSAT just got its funding pulled by Congress in the (second) attempt to terminate the program.

    in reply to: PAK FA news #2653157
    Vympel
    Participant

    The AL-41F is too big for Su-27 class engine bays, IIRC.

    in reply to: PAK FA news #2655019
    Vympel
    Participant

    Yet another Su-35 incarnation? Is this Su-35BM going to be a tech demo platform, or are they still hoping to sell the Su-35 as opposed to the Su-30?

    Its going to be the final Flanker to tide over the market until the PAK FA is ready.

    The RuAF on the other hand will just stick to upgrading it’s Su-27 feet until that time.

    in reply to: PAK FA news #2655822
    Vympel
    Participant

    The latest Sukhoi is the Su-35BM with AL-41F1 engines and advanced avionics including either Phazotron’s Sokol or NIIP’s new Irbis radars.

    Irbis is a rotating passive phased array, a newer generation than Bars but building on work done on that radar.

    Irbis is expected to be ready around 2006/7 so I guess this is the timeframe for the Su-35BM. The AL-41F1 program should be well advanced by then as well.

    Su-35BM eh? Where’d you get this new and interesting informaiton? I presupposed it would be equipped with AL-41F1 engines, but I hadn’t heard of a new radar from NIIP yet. What does “rotating passive phased array” mean, exactly?

    Of course, the AL-41F1 (or a variant thereof) will also power the PAK FA (unless a miracle happens and the MFI gets chosen, in which case they’ll need the original AL-41F).

    in reply to: PAK FA news #2655933
    Vympel
    Participant

    Generations not Changing

    The appearance of the new combat airplane isn’t expected until 2012

    Yesterday, the head of the Sukhoy Aviation Holding Company, Mikhail Pogosyan, and the air force commander-in-chief, General of the Army Vladimir Mikhaylov, almost simultaneously acknowledged that there will not be a revolution is military aircraft construction in the near future. Russian aces will receive the long-awaited fifth generation combat airplane not earlier than 2012. Only the aircraft’s concept design will be presented to the customer- the Russian Federation defense ministry- at the end of this year. The Su-35 airplane will fill the eight-year time interval, which, according to Mikhail Pogosyan’s assurance, will be “an intermediate airplane between the utmost as of today in the family of Sukhoy Su-30 and the fifth generation airplane.”

    Nevertheless, it will be difficult to call the Su-35 brand-new: the fighter, per se, will be a hodgepodge of all the best which has been produced by the Sukhoy OKB aircraft designers. In particular, they will take the airframe from the Su-27, and the different experiences of the Su-24M and Su-30 airplanes will be used. As regards the airframe, as Mikhail Pogosyan explained, the use of the airframe from the Su-27 “will permit essentially shortening the time for the development of a new aircraft, since tests of the airframe will not have to be performed. The new aircraft is supposed to appear as early as 2006. OKB adviser, Marshal of Aviation Evgeniy Shaposhnikov, also supported Sukhoy’s position on the upgrade while answering a Russkiy Kur’er question. “We have achieved such a technological level that it isn’t suitable to expect a revolution a revolution in aircraft construction. The Su-30 has even outpaced the fifth generation in aerodynamic qualities,” the ex aide to Russia’s president for space and aviation assured. “But it is worth putting work on the avionics over combat characteristics. The new generation airplane is not a 30-50 percent improvement of qualitative performance, but by 2- 3 times. But this can be achieved today only by evolutionary, and not by a revolutionary means.” “We will be able to preserve our leading positions in the aviation marketplace in the 2006 – 2012 interval with the Su-35 airplane and also owing to the upgrade of the Su-30,” Mikhail Pogosyan added.

    Nevertheless, these are the plans. For the time being the air force needs to be involved with more mundane affairs. In particular, to analyze the results of the two recent catastrophes: of the Mi-8 helicopter and of the Tu-22M bomber. As air force CinC, General of the Army Vladimir Mikhaylov, explained to us, the human factor led to both tragedies. “The flight controllers are to blame for the loss of the helicopter. On that day the temperature was zero at an altitude of 3,000 meters. It was madness to climb the airplane ((sic)) even higher. However, the flight controller gave the crew the order to take an altitude of 3,300 meters. In the Tu-22M crew tragedy, the main reason is technical, a generator malfunctioned. But there is not one generator on the airplane, but four. The crew, in view of little flying practice, was unable to enable the three other generators correctly. Moreover, the generator had been inoperative for 43 minutes before the catastrophe, however, the airmen did not report about this malfunction,” Vladimir Mikhaylov said.

    As regards the fifth generation airplane, the air force CinC confirmed to Russkiy Kur’er the words of the Sukhoy manager. “We expect the new airplane by 2012,” the general reported. “But it is supposed to be a really new airplane, and not an upgrade of an old aircraft.”

    Source: 29.07.04, Russkiy Kur’er

    “Su-35” is obviously a reference to the new Su-37 being built.

    in reply to: Sapsan pod first prototype #2658126
    Vympel
    Participant

    The original Litening could designate at 40,000+ feet and the Litening-2 was much improved in that regard.

    How much?

    It’s INS subsystem is used for image stabilization and boresighting to the aircraft. It keeps the laser locked on despite clouds and complex flight. Another advantage that the Litening has, is that it is interchangeable with the Elta Reccelite.

    Range of the ATFLIR is not mentioned in the brochure. Do you have a source? What kind of targets are identified at 48 nm?

    Yes it is- read the brochure on the Raytheon site carefully. Also see the picture resolution at 38NM.

    in reply to: Sapsan pod first prototype #2659021
    Vympel
    Participant

    Can Litening designate targets with a laser at over 50,000ft altitude?

    Does it have a range of over 48NM?

    ATFLIR and Sniper XR are the very latest for the USN and USAF respectively. The latest Litenings lost to them, remember?

    in reply to: Sapsan pod first prototype #2659913
    Vympel
    Participant

    Don’t think it approaches the Litening, which even has it’s own built in INS.

    Why bother with an INS on a pod? Any aircraft that uses Sapsan will have INS and GPS (GLONASS/NAVSTAR) anyway. What’s important is its targeting capabilities (at which Litening is better, I’d wager).

    However, either Sniper XR (based off the system to be used on the JSF) or ATFLIR are the best targeting pods in existence currently. Nothing else comes close.

    in reply to: Amphibious assault! #2075246
    Vympel
    Participant

    The PT-76 is hopelessly obsolete. The 2S25 Sprut-SD is a much more modern choice.

    in reply to: How lonh will it take China to indigenize Flanker #2660668
    Vympel
    Participant

    Every single one of these questions can’t be seriously answered with the facts available today.

    in reply to: Novator 3M14 LACM phase1 complete #2075283
    Vympel
    Participant

    Although the S-10 Granat has never been seen, it is assumed it is based off the Kh-55. In view of the fact that the Kh-55SM is being modified to Kh-555 standard; I see no reason why they couldn’t swap out the warhead on the S-10 (though the Kh-55SM is bigger due to its CFTs). An improved mission planning system will be required for the launching SSN, however (as on the Tu-160 and Tu-95MSM).

    in reply to: Sudan gets its MiG-29SE/UBs #2661572
    Vympel
    Participant

    How exactly can you tell from those poor quality pictures whether the aircraft are new or not? I see no reason to believe that these aircraft are anything other than unpurchased MiG-29S or MiG-29 9.13 aircraft built by Mikoyan for Soviet Air Force order, upgraded to MiG-29SE standard, and sold. Thats for all intents and purposes “new”. They’re only old if they’ve been actually used.

    in reply to: New Mikoyan light fighter info #2661635
    Vympel
    Participant

    MiG-37 I say. 😉

    in reply to: C130J woes #2662373
    Vympel
    Participant

    Why would you continue ordering planes if there hasn’t been one meeting requirements in eight years? Wouldn’t you refuse delivery until you get one that meets the requirements?

    Would make Lockheed Martin look bad. Besides, if you’re the program manager, and you refuse delivery, which defense contractor is going to give you a job when you retire from the military? None. 🙂

    And how do you sideline two operational squadrons for four years (!?!) with planes you know couldn’t perform the needed duties.

    Pork > Military.

    Puzzling. But I hope it doesn’t lead to an attack on the C130’s future development (yes, the base design is 50 years old but I like to think that are such things as a timeless design.)

    If there’s money to be made, nothing will stop it.

    in reply to: Novator 3M14 LACM phase1 complete #2075373
    Vympel
    Participant

    I wonder if there’s a non-export version of Klub.

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,357 total)