http://www.zenit-foto.ru/specials/avia/zarevo.htm
http://www.zenit-foto.ru/english/specials/avia/zarevo.htmIts an airborne version of:
http://www.zenit-foto.ru/specials/tank/nokturn.htm
http://www.zenit-foto.ru/english/specials/tank/nokturn.htm
Good work there!
Speaking of which, are you going to add Raduga and Zarevo and the GOES-3xx series from UOMZ to your website?
Oh you mean the Mi-24VM… nope.. still lost me…
It’s the picture that GDL posted- just think Mi-24VP but with new rotors, fixed landing gear, and the stub wings. There’s several floating around. I managed to nab some from Rostvertol’s website, before it somehow went away …
It’s a matter of Russian law. No Russian military equipment can be armed with foreign components, they have to be 100% from Russia. Even Ukraine doesn’t count. Whatever FLIR the Mi-24PN has in it’s ‘Zarevo’ sight, it’s not foreign.
As to what generation is, the Agava-M1 is over a decade old at least- I’d be very surprised if FLIR technology hadn’t advanced at all during that time.
The reason America wanted North Vietnam to sign the truce because it was humiliated by the NVA in the battlefield, and want to get out quick in order to avoid further humiliation.
ROLFMAO! Why don’t you tell us about battles won by the NVA against the US Army?
So whos making the FLIR? Is it a French or Israeli one? Which generation.
Huh? For the Russian upgrade? The Russians. They do make FLIRs you know.
VPAF using MiG-19/17/21 against much more advance F-4 Phantoms.
Only marginally more advanced, and not technologically mature in crucial fields, namely BVR.
The U.S have 700 fighters and bombers against North Vietnam, while the VPAF have only 160 fighters.
And I suppose the restricted ROE that the US aircraft was forced to operate under has no bearing on the issue?
According to Kanwa Defence News, which specialises in Chinese military matters, Beijing can cope with just one CSG currently.
‘But in five to 10 years, it can certainly take on seven,’ said Mr Chang Hong-yi, head of Kanwa, in an interview with The Straits Times.
‘China’s military potential is enormous and in terms of military technology, the gap with the US is closing fast,’ he added.
However, a Chinese military source who declined to be identified is more sanguine.
‘Even now, China can easily take on two CSGs,’ he said but conceded that there was no way it could face seven all at the same time.
This means that if China has to wage war over Taiwan, it has to be able to land and seize control of the island within the first 30 days.
Otherwise, under the FRP, six CSGs may well arrive to join in the battle.
‘All this leaves China with no choice but to start and end the war with lightning speed,’ said the source.
Politically, Summer Pulse is likely to be seen by many Chinese as naked intimidation.
‘This is gunboat diplomacy in the 21st century,’ the source remarked, adding that it would remind the Chinese people of their century-long deep humiliation by Western powers – and put Sino-US relations at peril.
Nice fantasy land they live in, really. Not the slightest *inkling* of the firepower 7 CVNs and their battlegroups command. :rolleyes:
Its a shame what they did to the Iraqi Air Force. Oh well- better than sending all the fighters up to tangle with F-15s and F-16s and add more to their kill ratios (like shooting fish in a barrel is a challenge).
The restrictions that apply to Yahkont, Brahmos, Kh-59MK etc are under the MTCR (Missile Technology Control Regime)- though on some level that is under Russian law, probably. The US is under the same restrictions.
Oniks was accepted for service 2 years ago. I wonder what platform it equips (I know what it will equip, just not what it equips now, if anything).
These pics would be the first production standard prototype yes? Or the first pre-production airframe, indicative of what it WILL look like, but with a paint job of course.
First production standard prototype- its got new avionics from the previous prototypes.
Drivel.
I’m surprising they put it on top- the most common ‘threat’ cruise missile to China would be Tomahawk- there aren’t many AGM-86 ALCMs left; though it may be a combination of Tomahawk/ALCM/CALCM.
On the missile/drone it says “NRIST”-
Nanjing Research Institute on Simulation Technique.
Here are their products:
http://www.nrist.com/english/e-product-wurenji.asp
Judging from their produts, its a drone/simulator target, about to be blown up 🙂
(the connection is abysmal)
“Strela-2M” is the standard Soviet name for SA-7b Grail.
I think the picture is horrendously out of scale too, no pod needs to be that big.