For the Naval element, I would like to see some of the Swedish CB90s, fitted with RBS-17 (i.e. the Naval Hellfire), and perhaps a light 30mm cannon. As for the air element, how about a handful of Bell 210s, and a few Cessna Caravans, i.e. basically a more modern version of UH-1Hs (the 210 is actually a rebuilt UH-1H) and An-2s. Overall, with a c.650,000 population should not aim for more than a few hundred personnel to man both its airwing and naval service, which imposes very strict limitations on what can be operated!
It will certainly be interesting to watch what happens over the next few months and years!
Turbinia: these corvettes are quite well armed, they have a 76mm gun, are fitted for Exocet SSMs, and certainly were supposed to be armed with the RIM-116 RAM, so basically, they are quite well equipped. The problem is that there is little visible difference between a large OPV and a light frigate/corvette, but there is a very major difference in reality – an OPV is fitted with little in the way of sensors, and very little armament, other than a gun. In contrast, a light frigate like the Kedah class, is fitted with radars, guns and missiles – they carry half the armament of a large frigate, i.e. either ASuW or ASW, not normally both simultaneously.
They make a lot of sense for some nations, since they are often a lot cheaper than a large frigate, and since they are simpler, can often be built in domestic shipyards, where a more complex vessel would need to be built elsewhere.
I heard they were thinking of giving the ship to the USCG, to operate as a floating disaster response facility, probably operating out of Florida (as the JFK currently does). It would be used to respond to any hurricanes, tsunamis, divine visitations etc, that hit along the Gulf coast or Eastern sea board. Since it would not need much speed, it could either be towed into place, or alternatively make its own way by keeping one or two boilers operational. Not the craziest idea, but probably not the most sane one either!
Fed: if you are contemplating the switch to digital, then I would recommend you make a first step, a while back I invested in a Fuji, and I was very satisfied. It was not one of the fancy digital SLR one, just a regular one (a very good one though), just 6MP, but all my photos came out real well. Best bit is that you can just keep taking photos, trying to the right shot – last time I used it, I would take four or five shots of everything rather than one or two, and when I get home, just pick the best one. A good first step into the digital realm though!
Great photos! I take it they did not offer you a flight? Or perhaps a souvenir, maybe a spare Hornet…
I am surprised to hear Ja speaking so positively of the Miracles, they certainly were not well liked by many in Oz. The French blocked their use on operations in Vietnam, and threatened to cut off spares supplies if they were deployed. That does not make for a great bargain (buying 116 aircraft, but not being allowed to actually use them as desired not making them very useful). Certainly the impression I have received was that they were not well liked – they were reasonably capable, but there were always rumours of problems with the Atar engines (not an uncommon problem, only really fixed in the later versions of the M53 engine apparently).
Well Fed, they probably thought you were someone important… Well, either that, or they figured that they had better not make a bad impression (the PN will not want to be seen as being less polite than the IN).
Much obliged Tin, that was actually the picture I had seen (on that very thread no less), and I would still venture to say it looks like an early Goalkeeper.
As for the Chinese Type 730, I would actually guess that it uses the GAU-8 ammunition – the whole things smacks of a little ‘creative design acquisition’… I think what WisePanda was meaning by ‘is there any french links to the Type 730 ciws’ was whether the Type 730 technology was acquired from France. I suspect the Chinese obtained the technology from a variety of countries – probably obtained the cannon design from France (easier when they are closing down a project using the design, thus disposing of documents), mount design from the Dutch (or Goalkeeper customer), and the systems integration from Russia…
I suspect that the 100mm does have a limited CIWS role, though I suspect it is not quite as effective as the Oto 76mm for that, probably in part due to the very widespread use of the Oto guns.
Tinwing: have you got a picture of the Samos/Satan, the only picture of it I have seen could well have been of an early Goalkeeper, just mislabelled, if not, it seemed very similar.
As for separation of gun and sensor, that is exactly how the Millenium gun works – it only weighs in at about 3.5tons, despite being a 35mm gun, largely due to having offboard sensors. I think the suggestion was that you could fit future combattants with one or two fire control radars in total, to control multiple RAM and Millenium gun systems.
Sorry, did not realise it had actually reached the 500 mark, I knew it was close though, but the point remains, it is a success, and not simply because it passed the 500 mark.
There will probably be an air wing, not an air force, it will probably consist of a handful of donated Hueys, and perhaps the odd Antonov An-2, but not much more. If air defence capability were really needed, then they might just ask someone to park a Hawk battery on the territory, not much more.
Flex: Slovakia is a very nice place, I was there only a year or so after the split, in the middle of a heatwave, and it still seemed a nice place!
The lease-to-buy and purchase-finance methods both have pros and cons – if they did not, they would not both exist! The tanker deal is a very bad example – it was seen as being a rip-off because it was a rip-off, it was one of the many Druyen affairs, where the DoD were overly willing to allow Boeing to dictate terms and conditions.
One particular attraction of lease-to-buy is that with a purchase-finance, you make a ‘balloon payment’ first, then subsequent monthly payments, whereas with a lease-to-buy, you make monthly payments, then the balloon payment. This is far more attractive for Central/Eastern European countries whose economies are growing (raising $10 now is a lot more difficult than finding $15 in five years time for a growing economy).
As for selling 500 being the threshold for sale success, then quite a lot of aircraft would fall short, but are considered good sales successes. I am not sure the Jaguar reached 500, the Harrier II did not as far as I know, and probably quite a few others too – and especially nowadays, setting 500 as the threshold would mean that an aircraft would have to secure at least 10-20% of the total market!
Well, all I can say is ‘oops!’ – this is quite embarassing, but to be honest, it is one of those things that happens from time to time!
Okay, taking the whole defence re-orientation a step further Steve:
8 new LHDs, c.25-30,000 tons each, based on the Schelde LHD30000 design (which is a commercial standard LHD, of 30000 tons displacement, but costing much less than it should), to operate as carriers and amphibs
8 new LSDs, on the same hull form as the LHDs, but configured as LPDs
16 Type 45s for AAW
32 Commercial-spec version of the Type 45 (like the Absalon), fitted with CEC rather than expensive radars
16 Astute class, fitted with a VLS (like of the 688 and 688I boats), for launching a new hypersonic nuclear capable cruise missile
The entire military could thus be based on three basic hullforms, with only slight differences between them! Now that is eliminating excess designs! :diablo: