dark light

PeeDee

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 2,115 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 737-800 Fueling Incident ? #523533
    PeeDee
    Participant

    You can run a Bell 206 Jet Ranger on Farmyard Red Diesel.
    My uncle did so in 1972. He had no choice, had an emergency landing in the middle of uncivilised France. I think he mixed ordinary petrol in it about 1 part to 10 Farmyard.

    in reply to: General Discussion #322007
    PeeDee
    Participant

    We have some Germans in town, tourists.
    Even they have purchased and worn a Poppy.

    in reply to: To wear or not to wear? #1903742
    PeeDee
    Participant

    We have some Germans in town, tourists.
    Even they have purchased and worn a Poppy.

    in reply to: General Discussion #322008
    PeeDee
    Participant

    ………you’re kidding right?, nope, no smiley.

    1,000lbs of muscle with 3′ horns and 4 steel toe capped hooves, red eyed, mucus dribbling, merciless, angry, male cow?:eek:

    Are you not confusing this with a fluffy kitten?:rolleyes:

    The winter evenings must fly by in your household. (where’s the weed smoking smiley?)

    Nope. I have seen a Bull dazed for a few seconds in this way. It was in Spain, in 1972. It wasn’t in the Bull Ring, it was a Farmer just being a typical non-British farmer and treating animals with contempt.

    The 2nd scene of going for the eyes, I have not seen. But the time to do it was there, should the need be.

    in reply to: Killing for "fun" #1903746
    PeeDee
    Participant

    ………you’re kidding right?, nope, no smiley.

    1,000lbs of muscle with 3′ horns and 4 steel toe capped hooves, red eyed, mucus dribbling, merciless, angry, male cow?:eek:

    Are you not confusing this with a fluffy kitten?:rolleyes:

    The winter evenings must fly by in your household. (where’s the weed smoking smiley?)

    Nope. I have seen a Bull dazed for a few seconds in this way. It was in Spain, in 1972. It wasn’t in the Bull Ring, it was a Farmer just being a typical non-British farmer and treating animals with contempt.

    The 2nd scene of going for the eyes, I have not seen. But the time to do it was there, should the need be.

    in reply to: General Discussion #322261
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Killing for food is one thing, but as a conservationist I have to say that killing other living creatures for pleasure just can’t be justified in this day and age, with no exceptions.

    It just so happens I live in the middle of a sporting estate, and am often sickened by parties of ‘sportsmen’ heading out for a shoot. These small people think they are so macho with their tweeds, rifles and shotguns, shooting ‘game’, but I wonder how well they would do if they were to fight, say, a red stag buck naked, armed only with their teeth and nails? The same applies to Matadors – I would like to see how tough they are without the recourse to swords, etc!

    What right do we humans have to decide if an animal lives or dies?

    Because we are the superior race on the planet. We are where we are because we killed. Yes, we therefore have the responsibilty that goes with that. Sport killing of Animals is bad and probably should be stopped, control has to be done. But often the control is turned into a sport, this is grey zone.
    ..and, if you sock a Bull right on the nose with a good punch, you have a chance to do other damage to it, maybe blind it with your fingers…in the 6 or 7 seconds you have.

    I’d kill certain humans for sport though. Osama for a start. Give him 1 minute head start and then take him apart with a 50 cal. Beautiful.
    How many people signed up (For £25,000) to the spoof website for a holiday hunting down the Pirates off Africa? Several thousand I recall.

    in reply to: Killing for "fun" #1903865
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Killing for food is one thing, but as a conservationist I have to say that killing other living creatures for pleasure just can’t be justified in this day and age, with no exceptions.

    It just so happens I live in the middle of a sporting estate, and am often sickened by parties of ‘sportsmen’ heading out for a shoot. These small people think they are so macho with their tweeds, rifles and shotguns, shooting ‘game’, but I wonder how well they would do if they were to fight, say, a red stag buck naked, armed only with their teeth and nails? The same applies to Matadors – I would like to see how tough they are without the recourse to swords, etc!

    What right do we humans have to decide if an animal lives or dies?

    Because we are the superior race on the planet. We are where we are because we killed. Yes, we therefore have the responsibilty that goes with that. Sport killing of Animals is bad and probably should be stopped, control has to be done. But often the control is turned into a sport, this is grey zone.
    ..and, if you sock a Bull right on the nose with a good punch, you have a chance to do other damage to it, maybe blind it with your fingers…in the 6 or 7 seconds you have.

    I’d kill certain humans for sport though. Osama for a start. Give him 1 minute head start and then take him apart with a 50 cal. Beautiful.
    How many people signed up (For £25,000) to the spoof website for a holiday hunting down the Pirates off Africa? Several thousand I recall.

    in reply to: General Discussion #322265
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Done.
    But sorry to say you are streets behind some of the others in % terms.

    in reply to: A favour to ask #1903871
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Done.
    But sorry to say you are streets behind some of the others in % terms.

    in reply to: Qantas 747 Engine Problem Today?! #524637
    PeeDee
    Participant

    ex Statistical analyst.
    The word Engine should probably be removed from the hypothesis. There must be another common denominator, like crap routine inter-flight maintenance befitting a low-cost ill-trained outfit (Not the proper one in Germany), bad practice by aircrew (Dunno what, but you see where I’m thinking) and such.
    And, we can always prove that there is no such thing as pure coincidence. Just as we can prove that there is, if that’s how you want the results!

    in reply to: Qantas A380 makes emergency landing in Singapore #524642
    PeeDee
    Participant

    WRT the Leading edge damage taking out the wiring for Engine 1….
    Dunno about A380, but it is normal practice to take all the wiring along the back of the Rear Spar, for exactly this reason. A severe bird strike test (8lb bird representing a Condor) is allowed to penetrate the leading edge but (Of course) not the Spar. So, there is little in the L/e apart from the anti ice ducting (Or wiring if it’s electrical) and the equipment/services for moving the L/e itself.

    in reply to: General Discussion #324108
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Just posted a message on the BSAC Forums, suggesting it could be turned into an artificial reef.

    My Mother watched the US do this off the coast of Florida. They made a bit of a show of it. USAF threw a few at it as part of a display, then it was finished with a back-breaking torpedo. Wonderful. They were hiring out Binoculors on the beach…it was a few miles out to Sea.

    in reply to: Where can we park the Ark? #1904825
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Just posted a message on the BSAC Forums, suggesting it could be turned into an artificial reef.

    My Mother watched the US do this off the coast of Florida. They made a bit of a show of it. USAF threw a few at it as part of a display, then it was finished with a back-breaking torpedo. Wonderful. They were hiring out Binoculors on the beach…it was a few miles out to Sea.

    in reply to: General Discussion #324112
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Excuse me, but what on earth are you talking about? :confused:

    Same question…..what on earth are you talking about? :confused:

    Q1. The question was about leaking classified info….would I break the OSA. No I wouldn’t, but if terrorists had my kids then I would indeed sing. Seemple.

    Q2. Whilst you were squandering billions in your anti involvement post, I was kind of supporting you. No ground troops, bomb the living daylights out of the place. No nukes, that brings complications in a World such as present.

    Oh, and I signed the OSA, presently cleared to DV, like a lot on here.

    in reply to: WikiLeaks #1904828
    PeeDee
    Participant

    Excuse me, but what on earth are you talking about? :confused:

    Same question…..what on earth are you talking about? :confused:

    Q1. The question was about leaking classified info….would I break the OSA. No I wouldn’t, but if terrorists had my kids then I would indeed sing. Seemple.

    Q2. Whilst you were squandering billions in your anti involvement post, I was kind of supporting you. No ground troops, bomb the living daylights out of the place. No nukes, that brings complications in a World such as present.

    Oh, and I signed the OSA, presently cleared to DV, like a lot on here.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 2,115 total)