dark light

LesB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 681 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canberra crash Crewkerne 60's/70's? #1182041
    LesB
    Participant

    If the Canberra only had one ejection seat and the French pilot ejected and was killed, the two crew remained and were safe in the subsequent crash?:confused:

    Canberra B.2s had three ejection seats. The fact that only the pilot ejected means the other crew didn’t, doesn’t mean they didn’t have ejection seats.

    .

    in reply to: RIAT- Some Suggestions For The Future #1200754
    LesB
    Participant

    Robbie’s Suggestions

    All good stuff except . . . I understand the Americans will not let mass public cars onto the base for security reasons.

    .

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1208291
    LesB
    Participant

    Anyone know the names of the crew(s) they are “training-up”?:)

    Does it matter?

    .

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1208853
    LesB
    Participant

    No Les… It was an aborted take off on the Sunday that Peter is referring too. Nose up all the way!

    Ah, soggy then Peter, I thought you were referring to Sat’s landing. Didn’t go Sunday. 😮

    But sympathies to all those who went Sunday expecting to see the People’s Tin Tiangle in der luft. Frustation index must have been very high.

    By the way, I managed to get a specific photo I wanted on Saturday – the two Vulcans together . . .

    http://www.canberra.plus.com/pics/Vulcans.jpg

    Nobody seems to have bothered to show this aspect, if they have, I apologise for my temerity. :rolleyes:

    .

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1208903
    LesB
    Participant

    Quite an impressive aborted takeoff over on youtube today.. Dave held the nose up for a great length of the runway, made for some good photos with the black sky and spray from the wheels!

    That was an aerodynamic landing Peter, not a take off. Waddo has a long enough runway to preclude the use of the ‘chute. Anyway, I guess they wanted to save having to re-pack so it can be used at Farnborough.

    Ref the BUFF. A RAF source says (Sat) it couldn’t be refuelled where it was as the concrete of those pans wouldn’t take the weight. It would have needed to taxy across to the far side pans and this would have further upset an already severly disjointed show schedule.

    😎

    in reply to: canberra prototype? #1214919
    LesB
    Participant

    Nash

    If you’re going to use images from a web site be so good as to at least credit that site.

    😡

    in reply to: Met Someone Who Claimed To Have Flown Victors Today #1229072
    LesB
    Participant

    Met someone who claimed to have flown Victors today

    He’s a fraud, there are no flying Victors left today.

    😀

    in reply to: Canberra WH773 #1240604
    LesB
    Participant

    Canberra PR.7 WH773 was the first production PR.7. First flight 16.8.53 To 540,82,31,80,58 and 13 Squadrons.Struck off charge Wyton 9.6.81. To 2331 ATC unit as 8696M 9.81. Dismantled at Wyton 2.90 to Vallance Byways,Charlwood 90. It was on the Wyton gate as of 1981. It did an approach to Yeovilton 1.7.80

    You don’t mention 773’s greatest endeavour. WH773 was one of three RAF Canberras that took part in the London/New Zealand Air Race in 1953. It was marked as No. 1 in the race (but not the winner). The other two were WE139, now preserved at Hendon, and WE142, now scrapped.

    .

    in reply to: Canberra WH773 #1240606
    LesB
    Participant

    Bex now hangs out in a modeller forum in another corner of the internet.

    .

    in reply to: What Type Of Aircraft Did You First Fly In? #1169390
    LesB
    Participant

    1956 as an ATC cadet. A Percival Prentice at RAF Machrihanish. All I can remember is that our Sqn CO, an ex-Sqn Ldr who flew Ansons with Coastal Command, must have had some residual clout in the Service as he seemed to be able to conjure up an Anson or Prentice about once a month (from RAF Bishopbriggs?). He flew us himself.

    😀

    in reply to: Canberra WH773 #1169476
    LesB
    Participant

    Scorpion’s excellent pics are, of course (I hope:rolleyes:), of WK163, the civvie flyer. Another set which show the differences twixt civvie and service may be useful and can be found here (at the bottom of the page) from PR.3, WF922 at MAM.

    Included here for your interest is a representative pic . . .

    http://www.bywat.co.uk/922/cp0.jpg

    These two posts are a bit ‘late additions’ but may help someone.

    😉

    in reply to: 1950s RAF Germany vehicle colours? #1171118
    LesB
    Participant

    When I was there (62-65), all MT vehicles were still painted dark olive green (except the Mercedes fire engines). Just about all the German make vehicles on the camps, (cars, trucks and tractors, etc) were ‘Reparation Materiel’ and had been green since early 50’s. The only RAF blue vehicles were Land Rovers and J2 vans.

    .

    in reply to: 59 Years Ago Today ! #1185225
    LesB
    Participant

    Canberra Anniv

    Every year on May 13th the Canberra Assoc holds a get-together for ex-Canberra blokes (and friends). Usually this is held in the Mess at RAF Wyton and it was there again this year. Goodly gathering of over 80 people, aircrew and ground crew, old friends and new friends (and, increasingly, absent friends). A slowly dwindling repositry of Canberry experience, knowledge and tales of world-wide daring-do with the Canberra.

    Pic shows us at lunch (a rather average turkey dish :rolleyes: )

    in reply to: Here We Go #1186418
    LesB
    Participant

    t had saw limited RAF service, starting in 1950 it joined 7 FTS, CFS and was phased out with them during 1956. A handfull joined 288 sqn in June ’53 and remained with them until Sept 1957, they were used for target towing work. Considering 196 were built it was a very short service time, but jets had well and truely taken over by 1956.

    Nice aircraft all-in-all.

    However, the RAF did have at least two on charge at RAF St Athan in 1958/’59/’60 when I was there as a Boy Entrant. One was used as air experience aircraft for the boy trainees and both were employed as taxying/marshalling instructional airframes – driven, mostly, by a mad Polish Master pilot who did exactly what was signalled to him to the consternation of most of us young lads.

    Doesn’t help any I guess but it sort of popped into my mind when I was reading the tread. :rolleyes:

    😉

    in reply to: First civilian Canberra? #1189810
    LesB
    Participant

    “Night Intruder”? Type, not name, distinguishes between recce and offensive. The RAF’s B(I)8s were called “Interdictors” and, sometimes, “Night Intruders” as well, but as with the US kites they were still Canberras. So, a marketing title or an old model kit is a good authorative source? Not really.

    I correspond with a couple of ex-Lt Cols who flew the things in Vietnam. They, and the current US Canberra Association, call them Canberras as a generic name giving their numeric designators to indicate the different and many roles.

    No, I guess the USAF didn’t use their Canberras in the US of A, they were pretty much all in Europe (Laon, France), North Africa (Idris, Lybia) and the Far East. The US employed Canberras to a great extent from the outset in Vietnam. I can recommend Robert Mikesh’s Martin B-57 Canberra.

    Also Pakistan used the US type Canberra during the Indo/Pakistan conflict, whereas India used the UK type – but that’s neither here nor there.

    😉

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 681 total)