dark light

LesB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 681 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: First civilian Canberra? #1189941
    LesB
    Participant

    The name may have been the same, but that was about the only thing!:D

    Machts nichts, they were still Canberras. I believe the licence agreement required the US airframes were to be so called.

    😉

    in reply to: First civilian Canberra? #1190123
    LesB
    Participant

    Shown –
    United States Department of Commerce
    United States Weather Bureau B-57As.

    Haven’t seen any Oil Co Canberras though.

    . . . is it a Canberra or a B-57?

    Same thing. The -57’s were named ‘Canberras’ as well.

    in reply to: VHF Type 382 Radio Controller Channel Info Cards #1193151
    LesB
    Participant

    VHF Type 382 Radio Controller Channel info cards

    Pic shows an actual card. This was sourced from the ever friendly Midland Air Museum.

    Hope this helps. 😉

    😎

    in reply to: Canberra Identity PLEASE (pretty Please) #1196430
    LesB
    Participant

    For the London-Christchurch Air Race the UK Canberra entry comprised two PR.3s and one PR.7. Two of the airframes are still whole and extant – WE139 at Hendon (PR.3) and WH773 (PR.7) now at Gatwick Air Museum. WE142 was broken up at 15 MU (Wroughton) in July 1970 and sold for scrap on 7 Sept 1970.

    Intrigued as to how you know your ‘bit’ from the scrapyard was from WE142 as the cockpit section was thought to have been ‘gifted’ by 15 MU to some ATC sqn up north somewhere. I can’t verify that though. Maybe Dave Burke will know?

    Nose had the legend London – Christchurch 24hrs 34mins painted just below the front of the cockpit. I think Albert Ross (of this forum) has a pic of 142 lying on the dump at RAF Wroughton.

    .

    in reply to: Help Wanted…… #1197249
    LesB
    Participant

    Just got to figure out where any other connections to it may be hidden – had a good feel around it as best as I could but not easy to find anything…

    On the Backplate and Mounting Tray?

    😎

    in reply to: Help Wanted…… #1197377
    LesB
    Participant

    Not the best of images. However I took a fairly extensive set of pix of that particular Hunter at MAM during its refurbishment a couple back. Having pretty much been all over it during said refurb (didn’t work on it, just grunted as the other two did all the work :rolleyes: ). Anyway, benefitted from the wisdom of the team, so I reckon it’s possibly the DME tranciever. This feeds the DME indicator located on the RH side of the pilots main panel. Gives Distance and Bearings to a known beacon.The box on the left of it is the IFF T/R.

    LesB
    Participant

    Progress. Good work Martin. All the luck, keep it up.

    .

    in reply to: What Mark of Canberra does this belong to? #1222696
    LesB
    Participant

    The new single pole switch was introduced in the early 50s to prevent tailplane runaway problems experienced on early marks fitted with one two-way directional tailplane switch. They were mounted on the top of the Right hand horn in a fore and aft position. The rearmost switch controlling the direction of tailplane travel, the front one controlling the introduced isolating contactor (fitted in the rear fuselage) to prevent tailplane runaway.

    The PR9 yoke had a similar two switch arrangement on the right hand horn but the switches were side by side toggled and joined at the top for thumb use. The ‘Press to Talk’ switch was mounted on the inside face at the bottom of the Right hand horn.

    An air brake control switch was mounted on the top centre of the horn on a separate mounting plate. The Left hand horn had differing switches mounted on the top according to Canberra type. The B(I) versions had triggers mounted on the Right hand horn.

    .

    in reply to: The Libya SR71/Canberra pic? #1225393
    LesB
    Participant

    Thought everybody knew this ‘photo’ thing was an urban myth.

    The tale, however, has its genesis in an event which happened back in the early 80s. An SR-71 was just finishing a trans atlantic crossing and begining to let down through 60/55,000 ft over west england for arrival at Mildenhall. In contact with western radar (or similar) the -71 asked for an ID on what was making contrails at their level about five miles to their 3 o’clock as they had not expected any traffic at their height. They were told it was a (39 Sqn) Canberra PR.9.

    .

    LesB
    Participant

    None!

    Got enough of that in the RAF.
    😎

    in reply to: RAF Chipmunk Livery Question #1241083
    LesB
    Participant

    This was at Wyton in the summer of 1970 when I was i/c three Chippies for the sqn pilots to play with.

    Beautiful summer that was, hazy, lazy days. Wyton’s runway was closed for resurfacing and the Victors and Canberras all went to Honnington. The pilots would phone in for availability around 08:30 and then motor over to fly the Chippies – we had three.
    .

    in reply to: Interesting Wreck Photos #1241107
    LesB
    Participant

    Mmm . . . typo.

    .

    in reply to: Interesting Wreck Photos #1241642
    LesB
    Participant

    The odd German WW2 experimental thing towards the end, looks like a twin jet, with jets over a delta wing……what is it?

    A Horton.

    .

    in reply to: V FORCE dispersed for the Cuban missile crisis ? #1241798
    LesB
    Participant

    John
    It’s understood that the Vs were loaded, what Ken is saying is that we didn’t fly with a “live” weapons (unlike the US and the French). Tend to agree as well. If a live-loaded airframe did actually get into the air in those days (especially in RAFG) it meant the end was nigh. The next thing we would do would be to collect the famlies from MQ and head for Ostend in convoys of 3-tonners.

    .

    in reply to: V FORCE dispersed for the Cuban missile crisis ? #1244390
    LesB
    Participant

    ken : Wynn is a good source and, I guess, is right in his reporting of policy. I do know however that definitely Geilenkirchen (and at least Wildenrath) had double occupancy QRA double-fenced compounds by at least Aug/Sept 62. These were complete with hard-standings, taxiways, open-ended hangars, and accom for two crews and related two sets of ground crews. So the powers must have started building these facilities (or up-grading them) early in 62. Could that be where the cost angle came in?

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 681 total)