dark light

Jon H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,237 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: XM603 Update #1042294
    Jon H
    Participant

    The imitation prototype paint scheme would make sense given all the markings are wrong for an anti flash scheme.

    Jon

    in reply to: How do you move cockpits / large aircraft sections #1045461
    Jon H
    Participant

    An A-frame, which is unequalled when it comes to lifting items on and off trailers, raising engines and other heavy items for stands to be made around them.

    I did wonder how long it would take you to mention it…… :p

    Few pictures I have found of it in use on here –

    Collecting Meteor T.7 WL405 from Bruntingthorpe
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=179892&d=1261496604
    Delivery of Graham Sparkes Sea Hawk cockpit to Hooton Park
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=168133&d=1230653641
    Fitting Sea Hawk WV838 to the trailer
    http://forum.keypublishing.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=135463&d=1153953608

    in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1049542
    Jon H
    Participant

    Chistmas treat to fit the canopy and screen frame eh – has to be done, sometimes to keep the enthusiasm going, though it looks like you have bundles of that.
    The seat looks really nice aswel.

    This must be the most careful and detailed restoration of single seat Vampire pod in a long time?

    That and the continuing need to free up space now that I am storing everything in the garage 🙂

    Jon

    in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1050176
    Jon H
    Participant

    Well done Jon,
    That sealant looked indestructable to me!
    Removing the glass makes it a much lighter assembly.

    When you consider the front screen alone is 2 1/4″ thick then yes it is a MUCH lighter assembly now!

    Jon

    in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1050582
    Jon H
    Participant

    Didnt look right without the windscreen 🙂

    I have no idea what sealants the RAF used back in the day, but all I can say it has taken nearly a week to scrape it all off and get the glazing out.

    Jon

    in reply to: Santa in mid air incident with 50's vintage warbird #1052620
    Jon H
    Participant

    Was bound to happen when you consider the physics (this has been around for years by the way but still amusing) –

    Consider the following:

    1) No known species of reindeer can fly. But there are 300,000 species of living organisms yet to be classified, and while most of these are insects and germs, this does not COMPLETELY rule out flying reindeer which only Santa has ever seen.

    2) There are 2 billion children (persons under 18) in the world. BUT since Santa doesn’t (appear) to handle the Muslim, Hindu, Jewish and Buddhist children, that reduces the workload to 15% of the total – 378 million according to Population Reference Bureau. At an average (census) rate of 3.5 children per household, that’s 91.8 million homes. One presumes there’s at least one good child in each.

    3) Santa has 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west (which seems logical).

    This works out to 822.6 visits per second. This is to say that for each Christian household with good children, Santa has 1/1000th of a second to park, hop out of the sleigh, jump down the chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the tree, eat whatever snacks have been left, get back up the chimney, get back into the sleigh and move on to the next house.

    Assuming that each of these 91.8 million stops are evenly distributed around the earth (which, of course, we know to be false but for the purposes of our calculations we will accept), we are now talking about .78 miles per household, a total trip of 75-1/2 million miles, not counting stops to do what most of us must do at least once every 31 hours, plus feeding and etc.

    This means that Santa’s sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3,000 times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man- made vehicle on earth, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per second – a conventional reindeer can run, tops, 15 miles per hour.

    4) The payload on the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming that each child gets nothing more than a medium-sized lego set (2 pounds), the sleigh is carrying 321,300 tons, not counting Santa, who is invariably described as overweight.

    On land, conventional reindeer can pull no more than 300 pounds. Even granting that ‘flying reindeer’ (see point #1) could pull TEN TIMES the normal amount, we cannot do the job with eight, or even nine.

    We need 214,200 reindeer. This increases the payload – not even counting the weight of the sleigh – to 353,430 tons. Again, for comparison – this is four times the weight of the Queen Elizabeth.

    5) 353,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air resistance – this will heat the reindeer up in the same fashion as spacecraft re-entering the earth’s atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer will absorb 14.3 QUINTILLION joules of energy. Per second. Each.

    In short, they will burst into flame almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer behind them, and create deafening sonic booms in their wake. The entire reindeer team will be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a second.

    Santa, meanwhile, will be subjected to centrifugal forces 17,500.06 times greater than gravity. A 250-pound Santa (which seems ludicrously slim) would be pinned to the back of his sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force.

    > In conclusion – If Santa ever DID deliver presents on Christmas Eve, he’s dead now.

    in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1058423
    Jon H
    Participant

    Well I had to trial fit a few more goodies 😉

    I wanted to put the rudder pedals on as well, but they are well and truly buried at the moment!

    Jon

    in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1058908
    Jon H
    Participant

    That’s looking brilliant Jon,

    A 2 inch gap should be easy to solve though….. its the fractions of mm that are the cause of endless frustration, ie. tolerance stacks.

    Keep up the good work,

    Very true 🙂

    I am sure it will fall into place once I double check everything, it just surprised me given how well everything else had gone until that point.

    It is nice to finally start seeing the curves and profiles of the pod re-emerging. I just need to find the top part of the nose cone (or a complete one) now to really set it off! As always any leads on one greatly appreciated as would make a nice christmas present for 193 😀

    Jon

    in reply to: Vampire FB5 VZ193 #1059112
    Jon H
    Participant

    Well 193 is the right length again now 🙂

    First trial fit of the floor and front bulkhead. Everything looking promising (alignment etc) though need to figure out why the top of the front bulkhead is 2″ out…….

    Jon

    in reply to: Old Black and White picture of Vulcan breaking apart #1061107
    Jon H
    Participant

    It was probably based on the Roly Falk footage at Farnborough as certainly looks similar –

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=GPuTgcrA2Zs&NR=1

    Jon

    in reply to: Old Black and White picture of Vulcan breaking apart #1061134
    Jon H
    Participant

    Looking at that I found this, never seen it before:eek:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-BXhmGsRVA&feature=related

    Though Vulcans have been rolled in public, this is a computer generated clip 😉

    Jon

    in reply to: Back from the dead… #1062699
    Jon H
    Participant

    Comper Swift G-ACGL must be the most recent example of this.

    Not sure it qualifies as the remains of CGL have been known about since the early 1970’s. There are pictures of the wings on here somewhere taken 25+ years before CGL was “discovered” by the RAFM!

    EDIT – found the pictures –

    post 13 on this one – http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=105893
    post 28 on this one – http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=106220

    Jon

    in reply to: What is this seat from? #1082249
    Jon H
    Participant

    My thought was Herc –

    http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/sts/Images/c130j2.jpg

    Nimrod was a possible as well, but looking at pictures the arm rests seem to rotate when in the up position to tuck in behind the seat backpad. Whereas these dont.

    Jon

    in reply to: Anyone need any BAC 111 seats?! #1082359
    Jon H
    Participant

    dunno….will attempt to ask!! They are pax seats in pairs

    Could be interested for the 748 if the rail pick ups are correct. Will get some details on what we need.

    Also whilst I rememeber dont suppose you have any 748/Andover cockpit glazing going spare? Got the front screens and the port sliding window and thats it currently.

    Jon

    in reply to: Are these bits of Mosquito? #1085912
    Jon H
    Participant

    Pictures of the two bits I mentioned in situ on the Vamp.

    Jon

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,237 total)