RE: British withdrawal from Northern Ireland
This topic has kicked off a fair bit of discussion, but given the information supplied so far, the question remains – should the UK pull out of Northern Ireland?
To add a further question to this topic, what benefit is there in the UK remaining in N.I.? What is the point in staying there if the cost is prohibitive and the likelihood of eternal peace is remote?
Understand that from 20,000 km away, the presentation on our media of the troubles in N.I. concentrates on the “newsworthy”, such as murders, riots, fights between various republican/loyalist groups and the police and other violent issues, without any explanation of the causes. I confess to being almost totally ignorant of the reasons for the violence or indeed, the UK’s determination to remain there. It doesn’t seem to be worth the trouble and I wonder what harm would be caused to the UK if it handed N.I. back to the Irish.
I would, however, like to thank a number of members of the board who have gone to some trouble to provide a good outline of the history behind the Irish problems. I am much the wiser thanks to their efforts.
Regards
Wombat
RE: Next Monday
Good chance of that – every moggy I’ve ever seen spent half its time licking itself!!!!!;-)
RE: British withdrawal from Northern Ireland
Mixtec
Thanks for that info too. At least I know now where 1917 fitted into the picture. I remember the film, I think Liam Nielson? starred as Michael Collins. I haven’t seen it so I’ll check out the local video library.
Regards
Wombat
RE: British withdrawal from Northern Ireland
Mixtec
Thanks for that info too. At least I know now where 1917 fitted into the picture. I remember the film, I think Liam Nielson? starred as Michael Collins. I haven’t seen it so I’ll check out the local video library.
Regards
Wombat
RE: British withdrawal from Northern Ireland
Mixtec
Many thanks for the most interesting enlightenment on how the aggro in Ireland began. It is interesting to read that, at one stage, the English owned 85% of Ireland, with the part they didn’t own being the North. Now the situation has completely reversed. Anybody know how and when the situation changed, and England handed Eire back to the Irish? And why did they persist in remaining in the north?
When you read this history, it is very easy to understand why Irish hatred of the English can run so deep.
Regards
Wombat
RE: British withdrawal from Northern Ireland
Mixtec
Many thanks for the most interesting enlightenment on how the aggro in Ireland began. It is interesting to read that, at one stage, the English owned 85% of Ireland, with the part they didn’t own being the North. Now the situation has completely reversed. Anybody know how and when the situation changed, and England handed Eire back to the Irish? And why did they persist in remaining in the north?
When you read this history, it is very easy to understand why Irish hatred of the English can run so deep.
Regards
Wombat
W 1048
Peter
Thanks for the web address, but I was actually thinking about W 1048 – are there any pics of this aircraft as she currently exists?
Regards
Wombat
RE: British withdrawal from Northern Ireland
Thanks for the comment, guys. I must confess that my knowledge of what make Northern Ireland tick is very limited, and Andrew’s responses certainly don’t alleviate my ignorance. (Thanks, Kev)
I’m a bit surprised at the number of individual groups you have referred to. In Oz, we hear of the IRA (naturally), Sin Fein, UVF and that’s about it. It appears that the republicans can’t even get themselves united in their opposition to Britain – am I correct in that assumption?
I have often wondered why it was that Britain became involved with Northern Ireland in the first place. When did the province become a part of the UK – was it 1917?
The thing that confuses me is the “loyalists” versus “republicans” argument, mingled with the Catholics versus Protestants problems. Are these two problems related? Surely there is a strong mix of Catholic and Protestant religions amongst the loyalists and the republicans, so how do they explain the hatred that we see so much of?
Andrew – you still haven’t told me why your dad was so important that he is blamed for many of the current problems – care to enlighten all of us?
Regards
Wombat
RE: British withdrawal from Northern Ireland
Thanks for the comment, guys. I must confess that my knowledge of what make Northern Ireland tick is very limited, and Andrew’s responses certainly don’t alleviate my ignorance. (Thanks, Kev)
I’m a bit surprised at the number of individual groups you have referred to. In Oz, we hear of the IRA (naturally), Sin Fein, UVF and that’s about it. It appears that the republicans can’t even get themselves united in their opposition to Britain – am I correct in that assumption?
I have often wondered why it was that Britain became involved with Northern Ireland in the first place. When did the province become a part of the UK – was it 1917?
The thing that confuses me is the “loyalists” versus “republicans” argument, mingled with the Catholics versus Protestants problems. Are these two problems related? Surely there is a strong mix of Catholic and Protestant religions amongst the loyalists and the republicans, so how do they explain the hatred that we see so much of?
Andrew – you still haven’t told me why your dad was so important that he is blamed for many of the current problems – care to enlighten all of us?
Regards
Wombat
RE: Australia’s refugee problem
Mongu/Rabie
The Tasman Bridge, over the River Derwent, which is the one Mongu referred to, was the scene of a major disaster in 1975, when a ship collided with one of the piers. A couple of sections of the bridge collapsed with the loss of quite a few lives.
Rabie – you’r lucky to have relo’s there – if you ever come over this side of the world, make sure you visit them and give Tasmania the look-over. It isn’t very big by Aussie standards, you can easily drive from north to south in half a day, and two to three weeks gives you adequate time to really see the place.
It’s a separate island to the rest of Australia and in many ways, it is a world removed from the mainland, too. A really beautiful place.
Regards
Wombat
RE: Australia’s refugee problem
Mongu/Rabie
The Tasman Bridge, over the River Derwent, which is the one Mongu referred to, was the scene of a major disaster in 1975, when a ship collided with one of the piers. A couple of sections of the bridge collapsed with the loss of quite a few lives.
Rabie – you’r lucky to have relo’s there – if you ever come over this side of the world, make sure you visit them and give Tasmania the look-over. It isn’t very big by Aussie standards, you can easily drive from north to south in half a day, and two to three weeks gives you adequate time to really see the place.
It’s a separate island to the rest of Australia and in many ways, it is a world removed from the mainland, too. A really beautiful place.
Regards
Wombat
RE: Australia’s refugee problem
Mongu
Despite what many Sydneysiders say about Melbourne, it’s a good place to live.
I come from Sydney, but find the oppressive humidity of our summers, combined with temperatures over 40C occasionally, really unbearable. I like cooler climates and, if I had my choice, would prefer to live in either Victoria or Tasmania. Tassie’s climate is not unlike Britains, just not as prone to severe cold and snow.
Hope it all works out for you. Melbourne is a fine choice.
Regards
Wombat
RE: Australia’s refugee problem
Mongu
Despite what many Sydneysiders say about Melbourne, it’s a good place to live.
I come from Sydney, but find the oppressive humidity of our summers, combined with temperatures over 40C occasionally, really unbearable. I like cooler climates and, if I had my choice, would prefer to live in either Victoria or Tasmania. Tassie’s climate is not unlike Britains, just not as prone to severe cold and snow.
Hope it all works out for you. Melbourne is a fine choice.
Regards
Wombat
RE: Halifax W1048
Anybody got a photo or two of the Halifax that they can post for those of us overseas?
Wombat
RE: Mystery Spanish Jet
Chaps
I’ve looked down this thread and wanted to make sure I wasn’t stating what had already been said.
The designer of the Ha-200 was none other than Willy Messerschmitt and this aircraft was actually a jet engined version of the HA-100 radial engined trainer, which was developed simultaneously. For some reason, the HA-100 development was slow, with its first flight occurring on 10 December 1953. The 200 first flew on 12 August 1955 It was equipped with twin Turbomeca Marbore II turbojets each of 400kp static thrust. The name Saetta means Arrow in Spanish. Total production, which ran from 1955 to 1967, totalled 97 aircraft and they served with Spain and the UAR.
The Saetta was Willy’s first post-war jet design and was followed by the HA-300 supersonic fighter, which flew on 25 June 1959 as a glider. Unfortunately, development was cancelled before the project was completed.
The Wombat