dark light

sea vixen

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 676 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rolling the Lanc.. #1258446
    sea vixen
    Participant

    The poor old stirling did receive a bad press but much of it was not the aircrafts fault – ie following the first test flight the angle of incidence on the wing was considered too low – but tooling for production was too far advanced for it to be changed on service aircraft – the solution was to create an amazingly complicated U/C – its achilles heel throughout its career- if you get the chance to see ‘Speed up on Stirlings’ a wartime production film recently re-released by IWM it shows a U/C retraction sequence – an amazing feat of engineering! And of course the wingspan was also clipped which limited the aircraft’s ceiling but also lead to the phenomenal roll rate mentioned above.

    What people forget is that it was conceived pre-war and the concept of a four engined monoplane ‘heavy’ was revolutionary – the lanc, halifax et all benefited from lessons learned by Shorts.

    The Stirling is and always has been my favourite aeroplane mainly because of its unjust treatment.

    TT

    i totally agree with you there TT. the Stirling has always been my favorite, out of the RAFs heavys. with that massive U/C and huge size. if there wings had never been clipped and the bomb bay designed better.. it would have been a world beater…still a awesome looking bomber…i never knew they where so agile.. well you learn something everyday..
    i wonder if enyone has “or attempted” to roll a B-52…..

    in reply to: Do JDAMS provide a new role for strategic bombers? #2592465
    sea vixen
    Participant

    still in the relms of fantasy…. i reckon us Brits and the French should have made a stratigic bomber based on Concorde…. then it would have been… B-1B, TU-160.. EAT YOUR HEART OUT…. 😉

    in reply to: Javelin vs Sea Vixen #1259010
    sea vixen
    Participant

    i would think all Navigators would have preferred the Javelin.. the Vixens Observers position was claustraphobic to say the least.. did they have eny sort of ejection seat… i would not have thought so…
    out of the two, which had the better radar and avionics.. what sort of performance did there radars have.. lastly why did the RAF equip some FAW-9 Javelins with refuelling probes.. also what mark of Jav was the best performer, most popular…. 🙂

    in reply to: Wedge Intakes #2592545
    sea vixen
    Participant

    i have always loved the Vigilante… a gorgeous looking aircraft… the king of all wedge or 2D intakes has to be the Tu-22m-3 Backfire…there intakes look huge…… 🙂

    in reply to: F-35 namig (at last?) #2592556
    sea vixen
    Participant

    Hurricane 2..sounds good.. i reckon the Royal Navy should call it.. “oh crap.. we should have kept the Sea Harrier.. FRS-1”!!!!!!!!.. :diablo:

    in reply to: Do JDAMS provide a new role for strategic bombers? #2593077
    sea vixen
    Participant

    wow….. wouldent that be fantastic…shall we all start a BRING BACK THE V-BOMBER APPEAL… but as BIGVERN have already pointed out… you have got more chance of flying to Jupiter in a Sopwith Pup….. still we can all dream…

    in reply to: Worlds most pointless air force #2593079
    sea vixen
    Participant

    sure you will, for at least another 20 years….

    in india maybe… but not here in old blighty… i will miss the Jaguar.. it really is a horrible thing when a old faithful retires… i actually cried when the Buccs went…… stupid sod.. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Worlds most pointless air force #2593096
    sea vixen
    Participant

    this thread is begining too remind me of the houses of parliment. i am starting too hear the back benchers mumberling… and the speaker shouting order…. :rolleyes: …. so do enyone on this forum like talking about AIRCRAFT……….. i watched two Jaguars roaring over my house earlier… BEAUTIFUL SIGHT… 🙂
    the most pointless airforce to me…… theres no such thing…. if a nations got 2 aircraft or 10.000. is still a airforce.. and the people who run and operate them do a fantastic job…… 😉

    in reply to: Canberra? #1261727
    sea vixen
    Participant

    PLEASE, ROYAL AIR FORCE, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE…. dont get rid of our beloved Canberra…. PLEASE…. PRETTY PLEASE WITH KNOBS ON……. 🙁

    in reply to: Is the Raf transport fleet over stretched ? #2593262
    sea vixen
    Participant

    how about making a “super streched herc” !!!!!!!! 😉

    in reply to: Worlds most pointless air force #2593277
    sea vixen
    Participant

    I currently have the mis-fortune of living in the UK and i have never seen or heard anything about that peace of crap you just posted FLY DESI. Everyone i have met in the UK would own a high powered car if they could afford it.

    i work in the motor trade… and i have never seen one of them before.. i dont think meny Brits would buy one of them… apart from them wierdos that currently drive them SMART :confused: cars…..
    by the way.. WHATS WRONG WITH LIVING IN THE UK. i wouldent want to live enywhere else.. 😡

    in reply to: General Discussion #318014
    sea vixen
    Participant

    got to 15.. but im starting to swear at the moniter…so i think i will stop for now. 😀

    in reply to: Annoying Game #1930283
    sea vixen
    Participant

    got to 15.. but im starting to swear at the moniter…so i think i will stop for now. 😀

    in reply to: blinders and fiddlers #2593623
    sea vixen
    Participant

    more like a Blinders nose, Foxbat air intakes, Su-22 wings and a rear section off a fiddler thrown in for good mesure… 😉 nice photo by the way… 🙂

    sea vixen
    Participant

    just a update…….. last night a RAF Chinook came over, low and fast.. and about 5 minutes ago 2 RAF Jaguars blasted over.. really low… best veiw ive had of a Jag for ages… fantastic… 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 676 total)