dark light

Smith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 1,284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WWII Bomber Command squadron codes – what font? #1252233
    Smith
    Participant

    THANK YOU

    Wonderful, thanks Mark V and others. My 10 minute challenge well and truly exceeded! And yes, I reckon another decal sheet is the answer. cheers all, Don

    in reply to: WWII Bomber Command squadron codes – what font? #1252422
    Smith
    Participant

    BUMP

    Have I asked a silly question? Maybe not phrased it correctly?

    There are many here who have sufficient knowledge to debate whether a given paint finish is “correct” or not, and others who are intimately involved with painting or owning warbirds. I honestly thought this would be one of those “answered in 10 minutes” threads! :p

    Can someone please tell me the correct font/text/whatever for the code lettering on the side of a WWII RAF bomber/aircraft. PA474 for instance?

    I have done my homework, searched the forum and the web, and found all sorts of interesting things about Al Deere’s aircraft and the like … but I honestly haven’t found the answer to this.

    Many thanks in anticipation. Don

    in reply to: How to hide an airplane [sic] factory #1253572
    Smith
    Participant

    amateur bomb disposal

    Wow … that’s impressive (if a little ill-considered) … medals well earned.

    in reply to: Airfix 1/72 Lancaster BIII #226211
    Smith
    Participant

    Further progress, canopy framing (painted decals then micro-something to seal it), weathering and low-sheen/matt. Transperancies sitting in place, not yet fitted. Finishing (adjusting sheen and weathering etc.) and detailing to come (dingy hatch, aerials, pitot, etc., etc.). Also remanufacturing .303 guns in scale from sprue.

    in reply to: How to hide an airplane [sic] factory #1253859
    Smith
    Participant

    Search button, third on the right!:D

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=74069&highlight=Aircraft+factory

    OOPS – apologies – still we’re reaching a wider audience by coming at it twice. I missed it first time! cheers D

    in reply to: Ok, own up, how many Airfixers out there? #226390
    Smith
    Participant

    I used to be, and have a friend who still is in a big way, see here (in the correct sub-forum 😎 )
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=76475

    in reply to: Sad loss.. #1256241
    Smith
    Participant

    oh God that is bad news … RIP C.P.

    in reply to: General Discussion #360723
    Smith
    Participant

    I-R-O-N-Y

    Have you no sense of humour, I think we call this a bit of a mickey take.

    Well hello … here I was thinking this :rolleyes: is the irony smilie.

    in reply to: I don't like the poor #1922310
    Smith
    Participant

    I-R-O-N-Y

    Have you no sense of humour, I think we call this a bit of a mickey take.

    Well hello … here I was thinking this :rolleyes: is the irony smilie.

    in reply to: Temperate Sea Camouflage #1259822
    Smith
    Participant

    This thread almost 2 years ago …
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=52359
    references various publications, one or more of which may help in your quest.
    D

    in reply to: Airfix 1/72 Lancaster BIII #226639
    Smith
    Participant

    Looking like a Lanc

    The partially finished gloss coats ~ detailing, semi-sheen matt, weathering, assembly yet to come

    in reply to: Airfix 1/72 Lancaster BIII #226667
    Smith
    Participant

    Gloss coats

    Gloss coats going on, masking, etc.

    in reply to: Airfix 1/72 Lancaster BIII #226715
    Smith
    Participant

    Preparation and smaller parts

    Sanding down the fuselage and wings, needle-pointing the props, tidying up undercart, etc. Then initial painting.

    in reply to: Lancaster over Hamburg #1264405
    Smith
    Participant

    Ahhh … maybe I guess … how long an exposure would this be? I’m still struggling a bit with the whole of the image.

    How is the single clear exposure of the other aircraft explained – wouldn’t we have a ghosted image? Is the camera aircraft effectively “panning” the lower one in this photo? But wouldn’t their relative movements be all over the place? Is this an exceptionally rare clear exposure – a fluke of chance?

    Or maybe I’m just missing something here – I’m no pro photgrapher.

    in reply to: Lancaster over Hamburg #1266026
    Smith
    Participant

    Hi Gnome – we always seem to end up in the same threads, don’t we?

    Time zone maybe 😉

    Thinking about your long-exposure point. There’re a number of squiggles behind and to port of the Lanc in the photo that share the same shape and I can see how they could be tracer arcs (rising up then falling away) captured by a moving camera. There would be a lot of turbulence over those fires.

    But that doesn’t explain for example the smooth bright arc at bottom left of the picture.

    Also I note some of those lines seem perfectly duplicated. Twin tracer? Or are there two exposures on this image?

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 1,284 total)