dark light

Supermarine305

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 337 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flux Capacitor #917874
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    The 60’s Labour govt surely. And while we are at it I’d erase Eden’s Conservative government to kill off the ’57 Defense White Paper. Just for the sake of balance.

    But if I have to stick to aircraft. The Lockheed 104 Starfighter. Sure it was fast. But so were a lot of other aircraft, which could also do turns. It was a death trap and was pushed on various air forces through bribery.

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    What I have heard, possibly from these forums, is that whenever the USAF moots getting rid of their A-10s, the the US Army shows an interest in buying them up. Seeing as the USAF can’t abide anyone muscling in on their patch they promplty prolong the life of the airframes. I have no idea how apocryphal that tale is though.

    I am surprised that the A10 and the U2 were mooted for phasing out. Ithought they and the B52 had years left in them because there was nothing else that did what they did as well as they did.

    And as a side note the RAF really should have gotten some A10s. As most air war is about blowing stuff up on the ground they would have been invaluable.

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Reading and re-reading it seems to me to be the parish council fearing, say; someone for Lilley just down the road complaining about a lack of memorial for a wartime crash there when Great Offley have just had their’s.

    In the local area there is the Lancaster crash and the Glebe Farm Explosion and how much trouble would it be the remember them all? There can’t be many others in such a rural location.

    All in all, its a pretty poor excuse.

    Also, a recollection of life in Ottley during wartime, including the Lancaster crash and the explosion at Glebe Farm: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/41/a6336641.shtml

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I was not aware that there was any part of a G-12 surviving at all. It is a remarkable survivor.

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Is that an original G-12 cockpit canopy frame?

    in reply to: Mosquito vis-a-vis Beaufighter #895535
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Mosquito Tr.33 navalised torpedo bomber and strike aircraft. About 50 were built post-war.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]228961[/ATTACH]
    I think that image is in the public domain.
    There were also a few Tr.37s that differed in radar.

    I do have a picure I scanned from an old librabry book -it was done a long time ago. I can’t remember the book. Don’t want to break copyright- that shows a Yugoslavian Mk.IV converted to carry a TR54/A torpedo dated to 1953. It has had the four cannon fared over. 5 aircraft were eventually converted.

    in reply to: Luftwaffe Air-Sea Rescue in upper North Sea area #896384
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Thank you.

    I was aware of the gloriously anarchic looking Heinkel 59. But I have no idea if it was used that far north. The Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine had other types that could have been used for ASW that never made it to the western Scandanvian coast as far as I am aware.

    Others like the Dornier Do26 and Blohm & Voss Bv222 I thought were just too big and/or few in number. Were they used for ASW operations too? Sunderlands rescued downed sailors and aircrew, so why not them?

    Its only recently that I have taken more of an interest in the operations of aircraft rather then just the planes themselves.

    in reply to: The Queen's new coach with aviation content #897572
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    To be fair I did hope the aviation content referred to wings that popped out of the sides like on Danger Mouse’s car. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Luftwaffe Air-Sea Rescue in upper North Sea area #898363
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Thanks for the clipping MothMinor. I am left wondering what happened to teh heinkel engine after Strathallen closed.

    I feel my list does need some clarification on a few points:

    It is a lost of aircraft that could and did pick up downed aircrew.

    I am confident all saw service in Scandavian coast. I might be wrong.

    I don’t know what units were attached to bases in that region bases and when. And what they flew.

    And a thought recently came to mind: All the types I listed were seapales and float planes. I don’t know if Stavanger and Bergen had facilities to to house them.

    in reply to: Luftwaffe Air-Sea Rescue in upper North Sea area #899236
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I would say the following would be likely. Though no doubt someone more knowledgable would be able to add and delete some types and maybe give some more operational detail.

    Dornier Do 18. Range 2175 miles (phased out in 1941)

    Dornier Do 24. Range 1678 miles

    Heinkel He 115. Range of 1305 miles.

    Blohm & Voss Bv 138. Range of 2670 miles.

    Arado Ar 196. Range of 670 miles.

    * Figures are from Wikipedia. Distances are in standard miles. I would asseme none are in nautical miles.

    Even if the Luftwaffe were able to field a whole flotilla of aircraft the downed airmen would have had a pitiful chance of survival in the North Sea. Even with our 70 year headstart in technology it took a week to find the Cheeki Rifiki with a visual seach (though that was a larger area).
    It was a very pragmatic choice to ditch in enemy waters with at least a chance of being picked up.

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I am intrested in why some operators are not happy with the proposed changes? it would give some clarification to this discussion from us non-flyers.

    David B you can make statistics read what you want,

    1 in 10 drivers killed on the road were under the influence of Alcohol…… Shock horror, but look at it another way, 9 were sober, so drink driving must be safer.

    Its all too easy to make bad statistical analogies. For instance the one above would only hold water if, at any one time on average, 10% or more drivers were under the influence.

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I don’t think that is the handle. That long bit of metal is -I am assuming- is to secure the access panel.

    On the painted side in the central recess there is a handle, and going by the internationally recognised system of measurement; The Kitchen Roll, looks to be in size and function, very much like a wing nut.

    in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Latest #924322
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    ‘808’ is due to go to Cosford after all?

    I am a little happier now 🙂

    in reply to: Hawker Typhoon parts. #926386
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    That is looking amazing.

    When I snuck into Flowers scrapyard when I was a kid I had no idea there was a Typhoon cockpit lurking in there.

    in reply to: P-61 Black Widow Ramjet tests #934053
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Very interesting pictures there

    I will have to be pedantic and point out that the silver aircraft shown, #559300, is the related Northrop F-15 Reporter.

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 337 total)