That looks like a tail wheel… that’s off something with wings.
It would be helpful if there were a sense of scale in the photo and there are any markings on the tyre.
Of everything I have heard over that episode, Orion (#33), I’ve not heard of the RAF’s involvement.
Thank you for adding a little more to my meagre knowledge. :eagerness:
The post-war Clement Attlee governent
It was just plain stupidity and naïveté. I believe one of the conditions of the transfer was that the Soviets don’t use the engine for military means. The Soviets copied it as best they could of course as the Klimov RD-45 and then the VK-1 and used it the power the Mig 15, Mig 17 and Il-28 Beagle. Then they passed the design to the Chinese who made the WP-5 derivative.
Was West Germany’s change of heart due to all that illicit Lockheed money? :rolleyes:
Its very hard to say what was an honest choice and what wasn’t due to all that bribery. :dev2:
Its very true the especially in the post-war period successive governments squandered opportunities for the UK’s aircraft industry.
And its true that the UK aircraft industry hadn’t modernized as much as it aught too either.
But,wasn’t a certain aiviation manufacturer found to have been bribing European governments to takes its F-104 fighter.
How could the promising SR.177 have competed against such underhand tactics like that? 😛
Happy to hear the injuries are minor. Best wishes for a speedy recovery.
Hope you’re back in the air again soon.
……and the hat……..
I agree. It should be a cowboy hat. And she’s riding that bomb all wrong too. Should be facing the other way. :rolleyes:
No. Its not that much fun. This thread is fairly painful.
This is not a forum heavy on statistics. Speaking for myself I enjoy the history and the looks more than ‘which is best’.
As other’s have said, others that know more than me, your’s is not a question that can be answered at all. All those aircraft you listed were good aircraft and a good pilot in any one of those would have given an equally good pilot in any of the others a hard day’s work with an uncertain outcome.
Your question can not and will not have a ‘yes, type XXXX is the best’ type resolution. All it can be is discussed on and on and on…. And I don’t want that.
Does it really matter which is best?
I did attempt a couple searches on Google. I couldn’t find anything certain. I didn’t think to search the civil reg, and that does work just fine.
Is it going to be restored as a Sparrowhawk or as the Sparrowjet?
Be wary.
The preserved arcraft is an Arado 234B. The profile drawing is of an Arado 234C, the four engined variant. The cockpits are very different. You can see the differences in the framing in the above pictures. Also the C varient shows gun placement that isn’t on the Museum example.
But, I don’t know the measurements or any other details of either, except that the ‘C variant cockpit was obviously larger.
Perhaps they’ll dust off their LVG C.VI and put that on display. Here’s hoping.
Simply outstanding. :applause:
It wasn’t until the final word of your post that I realized it wasn’t a photograph.
I don’t think it looks like the military recovering the crashed aircraft. Might it be some civvies with a WWII surplus truck and jeep getting some scrap for extra cash? That would be a good reason why they’d bother. There seems to be a fair bit of variation in what the gents are wearing.
If it was military would they be attempting to tow the weakage away like they are in both images?