dark light

Bruggen 130

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 2,114 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #326398
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Bruggen130 is correct in saying that the Space Station does not travel South to North. Over Britain it always travels West to East, I think what you are seeing is a Polar orbiting NOAA sat that travels North South or reverse as said by Al.
    Ian

    The problem is that some people see a bright light traveling at a steady speed the first thing they think of is ISS, below is the chart for oct from heavens above for Blackpool.

    Click on the date to get a star chart and other pass details.

    Date Mag Starts Max. altitude Ends
    Time Alt. Az. Time Alt. Az. Time Alt. Az.
    10 Oct -0.9 04:45:51 18 ESE 04:45:51 18 ESE 04:46:50 10 E
    10 Oct -3.3 06:17:28 21 WSW 06:19:13 55 S 06:22:05 10 ESE
    11 Oct -2.2 05:11:41 35 ESE 05:11:41 35 ESE 05:13:38 10 E
    11 Oct -3.0 06:43:17 11 W 06:45:55 44 SSW 06:48:43 10 ESE
    12 Oct -3.4 05:37:29 55 S 05:37:29 55 S 05:40:19 10 ESE
    12 Oct -2.2 07:09:57 10 W 07:12:30 27 SSW 07:15:03 10 SE
    13 Oct -0.2 04:31:41 11 E 04:31:41 11 E 04:31:49 10 E
    13 Oct -3.0 06:03:18 33 WSW 06:04:05 42 SSW 06:06:52 10 ESE
    14 Oct -1.0 04:57:30 18 ESE 04:57:30 18 ESE 04:58:25 10 ESE
    14 Oct -2.2 06:29:07 17 WSW 06:30:35 25 SSW 06:33:04 10 SE
    15 Oct -1.8 05:23:20 25 SE 05:23:20 25 SE 05:24:52 10 SE
    15 Oct -1.4 06:55:20 10 WSW 06:56:54 14 SW 06:58:26 10 S
    16 Oct -1.8 05:49:13 21 S 05:49:13 21 S 05:50:56 10 SSE
    17 Oct -1.2 06:15:10 12 SSW 06:15:10 12 SSW 06:16:03 10 S

    in reply to: Unidentified Flying Object #1906126
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Bruggen130 is correct in saying that the Space Station does not travel South to North. Over Britain it always travels West to East, I think what you are seeing is a Polar orbiting NOAA sat that travels North South or reverse as said by Al.
    Ian

    The problem is that some people see a bright light traveling at a steady speed the first thing they think of is ISS, below is the chart for oct from heavens above for Blackpool.

    Click on the date to get a star chart and other pass details.

    Date Mag Starts Max. altitude Ends
    Time Alt. Az. Time Alt. Az. Time Alt. Az.
    10 Oct -0.9 04:45:51 18 ESE 04:45:51 18 ESE 04:46:50 10 E
    10 Oct -3.3 06:17:28 21 WSW 06:19:13 55 S 06:22:05 10 ESE
    11 Oct -2.2 05:11:41 35 ESE 05:11:41 35 ESE 05:13:38 10 E
    11 Oct -3.0 06:43:17 11 W 06:45:55 44 SSW 06:48:43 10 ESE
    12 Oct -3.4 05:37:29 55 S 05:37:29 55 S 05:40:19 10 ESE
    12 Oct -2.2 07:09:57 10 W 07:12:30 27 SSW 07:15:03 10 SE
    13 Oct -0.2 04:31:41 11 E 04:31:41 11 E 04:31:49 10 E
    13 Oct -3.0 06:03:18 33 WSW 06:04:05 42 SSW 06:06:52 10 ESE
    14 Oct -1.0 04:57:30 18 ESE 04:57:30 18 ESE 04:58:25 10 ESE
    14 Oct -2.2 06:29:07 17 WSW 06:30:35 25 SSW 06:33:04 10 SE
    15 Oct -1.8 05:23:20 25 SE 05:23:20 25 SE 05:24:52 10 SE
    15 Oct -1.4 06:55:20 10 WSW 06:56:54 14 SW 06:58:26 10 S
    16 Oct -1.8 05:49:13 21 S 05:49:13 21 S 05:50:56 10 SSE
    17 Oct -1.2 06:15:10 12 SSW 06:15:10 12 SSW 06:16:03 10 S

    in reply to: General Discussion #326641
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Whats your location, because I don’t think the ISS travels in a south to north
    direction over GB.

    in reply to: Unidentified Flying Object #1906227
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Whats your location, because I don’t think the ISS travels in a south to north
    direction over GB.

    in reply to: General Discussion #326954
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    ahem, excuse me poppet, kindly step outside so we can discuss this :rolleyes:

    what’s not to like !?!?

    Thunderbird Two from Flygirl is a good call as well….. it was always my favourite (with the Mole!)

    Sorry i’m talking about the first Battlestar you know the one before you were born:D, then again the new one was just as crap all that zooming in and out,
    gave me an headache that did:diablo:

    in reply to: Your favourite Science Fiction 'Craft'. #1906424
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    ahem, excuse me poppet, kindly step outside so we can discuss this :rolleyes:

    what’s not to like !?!?

    Thunderbird Two from Flygirl is a good call as well….. it was always my favourite (with the Mole!)

    Sorry i’m talking about the first Battlestar you know the one before you were born:D, then again the new one was just as crap all that zooming in and out,
    gave me an headache that did:diablo:

    in reply to: General Discussion #327199
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    The Battlestar Galactica, sh!t series though.

    in reply to: Your favourite Science Fiction 'Craft'. #1906609
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    The Battlestar Galactica, sh!t series though.

    in reply to: General Discussion #330901
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Creaking Door;1639732]Now it would be foolish for me to argue with the likes of Carl Sagen! 😀 But…

    …taking the ‘first few hundred million years’ of Earth’s history as 1000,000,000 years then 3,000,000,000,000,000 tons of comets (water) is going to be arriving at a rate of 3,000,000 tons a year!

    Wasn’t the Tunguska explosion in Siberia in 1908 that flattened 2000 square kilometres of forest supposed to be a comet (estimated as ‘a few tens of metres’ across)? So, I’m sure we’d notice 3,000,000 tons of comets arriving every year! :diablo:

    So when did that all stop? :confused:

    Obviously the rate of comet impact must have slowed, so that begs the question why?

    It all stopped a few billion years ago , but when the solar system was forming
    5 billion years ago our little part of the universe was a very violent place.

    in reply to: Curious crash in California #1908507
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Creaking Door;1639732]Now it would be foolish for me to argue with the likes of Carl Sagen! 😀 But…

    …taking the ‘first few hundred million years’ of Earth’s history as 1000,000,000 years then 3,000,000,000,000,000 tons of comets (water) is going to be arriving at a rate of 3,000,000 tons a year!

    Wasn’t the Tunguska explosion in Siberia in 1908 that flattened 2000 square kilometres of forest supposed to be a comet (estimated as ‘a few tens of metres’ across)? So, I’m sure we’d notice 3,000,000 tons of comets arriving every year! :diablo:

    So when did that all stop? :confused:

    Obviously the rate of comet impact must have slowed, so that begs the question why?

    It all stopped a few billion years ago , but when the solar system was forming
    5 billion years ago our little part of the universe was a very violent place.

    in reply to: General Discussion #331096
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    not necesarily the case they are now proving that some bacterias can survive in molten lava!

    I know that life can survive in thermal vents and volcanic hot springs, but molten rock is news to me.

    in reply to: Curious crash in California #1908586
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    not necesarily the case they are now proving that some bacterias can survive in molten lava!

    I know that life can survive in thermal vents and volcanic hot springs, but molten rock is news to me.

    in reply to: General Discussion #331100
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    All the water on Earth from comets? Given that Hydrogen is the single most common substance in the universe, is highly reactive and the result of this reaction is usually water isn’t it more likely that this is where the vast majority of water on Earth comes from?

    No sorry but the scientific world seems to think thats where all the water came from,[QUOTE] “Over the first few hundred million years of Earths history they (comets) would have deposited (3,000,000,000,000,000,) tons of water. just possibly most of the water in the oceans arrived via a cometary delivery service after the Earth was fully formed. Certainly, comets would not have been the only source water. Molten lava arriving at the Earths surface from the interior is known to carry with it a few percent of water, and volcanic events were frequent billions of years ago.[QUOTE] Comet by Carl Sagen. this is just one of the many books that state the same thing
    So I should have said most instead of all, Sorry.

    in reply to: Curious crash in California #1908588
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    All the water on Earth from comets? Given that Hydrogen is the single most common substance in the universe, is highly reactive and the result of this reaction is usually water isn’t it more likely that this is where the vast majority of water on Earth comes from?

    No sorry but the scientific world seems to think thats where all the water came from,[QUOTE] “Over the first few hundred million years of Earths history they (comets) would have deposited (3,000,000,000,000,000,) tons of water. just possibly most of the water in the oceans arrived via a cometary delivery service after the Earth was fully formed. Certainly, comets would not have been the only source water. Molten lava arriving at the Earths surface from the interior is known to carry with it a few percent of water, and volcanic events were frequent billions of years ago.[QUOTE] Comet by Carl Sagen. this is just one of the many books that state the same thing
    So I should have said most instead of all, Sorry.

    in reply to: General Discussion #331262
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Life came to earth on a comet?

    …or on a block of rock and ice that spends billions of years floating through space at near absolute zero until it finally blunders into a solar system and plummets into a planet and explodes with the heat of thousands of nuclear weapons? 😀

    That is exactly what a great number of physicists think how life came to earth, all the water on earth came here on comets and you need liquid water for life:D

Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 2,114 total)