Sorry – I disagree with that 100% There was nothing in Casino Royale that said to me it was a bond film apart from the lead characters name. Change that and the film name and all you had was a mediocre action film – not a bond film. As for the latest one, if it is in the same mould then I for one will not be seeing it.
I have to agree with you, the bond films have been turned in to something like the shoot em up games you
get for your PC, thats probably why the younger people
like them so much. 😀
Sorry – I disagree with that 100% There was nothing in Casino Royale that said to me it was a bond film apart from the lead characters name. Change that and the film name and all you had was a mediocre action film – not a bond film. As for the latest one, if it is in the same mould then I for one will not be seeing it.
I have to agree with you, the bond films have been turned in to something like the shoot em up games you
get for your PC, thats probably why the younger people
like them so much. 😀
And of course the U.S governments have never ever supported ‘undesireable regimes’ :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
cheers baz
Beat me to it, baz 😀
what he means then, is that it’s alright to bribe friendly countrys but not undesirable one’s.
Dont ya just love the yank mind set.
And of course the U.S governments have never ever supported ‘undesireable regimes’ :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
cheers baz
Beat me to it, baz 😀
what he means then, is that it’s alright to bribe friendly countrys but not undesirable one’s.
Dont ya just love the yank mind set.
And the UK’s relationship with Saudi Arabia is oh so critical ‘your a very naughty boy and here is some Typhoon’s to tell you how naughty you are.’:rolleyes:
Got to laff at that one, F104 project and america back handing half the politicians of europe to sell them an aircaft that could not fly in anything approaching bad weather:D
And the UK’s relationship with Saudi Arabia is oh so critical ‘your a very naughty boy and here is some Typhoon’s to tell you how naughty you are.’:rolleyes:
Got to laff at that one, F104 project and america back handing half the politicians of europe to sell them an aircaft that could not fly in anything approaching bad weather:D
In my opinion the last two Bond films are in the same mould as all the other shoot em up films,( Die Hard, Rambo). I mean the opening scene of Casino Royal would put Spiderman to shame, just stupid.:D
In my opinion the last two Bond films are in the same mould as all the other shoot em up films,( Die Hard, Rambo). I mean the opening scene of Casino Royal would put Spiderman to shame, just stupid.:D
Bruggen 130, Yes that is the King, for some reason we use Roman numerals, which are all letters ? therefore it should be VIII, not V111 as I first posted, my mistake was corrected by JDK,
Keith.
Oh right, I thought you were dropping the “King” for some reason, I made the same mistake with the 1’s:D
OOOOPPPPSSSS Thank you JDK, thread suitably ammended, almost lost my head there. 😎
Keith.
So who’s the king Edward V111 that was King for 325 days in 1936 or am I missing something?
Phil
read the books….
this “…shaken, not stirred…” Bond is not whaty Fleming had in mind.
That’s the thing tho, nobody’s interested in the books anymore, you think of Bond, and Connery, and Moore spring to mind.
read the books….
this “…shaken, not stirred…” Bond is not whaty Fleming had in mind.
That’s the thing tho, nobody’s interested in the books anymore, you think of Bond, and Connery, and Moore spring to mind.
Daniel Craig, the best bond?, that’s not even funny, no class, no charm he just comes across as a thug. might as well have got Bruce Willis to do it.
The names Bond, James Bond, Pal:rolleyes:
Daniel Craig, the best bond?, that’s not even funny, no class, no charm he just comes across as a thug. might as well have got Bruce Willis to do it.
The names Bond, James Bond, Pal:rolleyes:
Kaye Ballard, Fly me to the Moon 😮