dark light

mackerel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 561 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anyone know what Hurricane this is? #1084462
    mackerel
    Participant

    Agreed. 🙂

    PS915

    Thanks MK12.

    Steve.

    in reply to: Burma Spitfires #1084486
    mackerel
    Participant

    surprised no one noted this from The Birmingham post August 16th

    http://www.birminghampost.net/life-leisure-birmingham-guide/postfeatures/2012/08/17/final-push-in-battle-to-save-mark-x1v-spitfires-65233-31629022/

    Well there’s optimisum for you !! Wouldnt do much for currant spitfire prices !! But then again they are only MKXIV’s.

    Steve.

    in reply to: Sheet metal folder #962669
    mackerel
    Participant

    Edwards do a bench mounted 30″ pan folder, heavy as ****, but more versatile; Rocketeer is right though, they’re never long enough!

    Hi you should look throught pages of exchange & mart & buy a second hand edwards 4ft floor mounted folder, much better buy than a bench mounted one.

    Steve

    in reply to: Spitfire art ID and Seafire propellor #983318
    mackerel
    Participant

    Sorry to post a boring parts ID but I’m stuck with this one. Although I’m trying to do a MK1X Cockpit the part I have doesn’t appear to be much use to me as it maybe an engine starter socket mount? A fellow member has suggested this but I was told initially it was something to do with an oil cap ?
    Moving on. I have recently obtained a set of 3 Seafire blades with the reference RA10271 which were fitted to Seafire 46’s and 47’s. Two of the blades though are still screwed into what I can only describe as large ciruclar metal collars. Has any one got plans that show how the propellors were fitted to the hub using these collars.
    Is anyone working on a Seafire project
    Looking forward to the invaluable help which I always get from fellow members.

    Hi ,the pitch of the three holes looks very similar to ground supply hook up mount, but not like spifire one’s i’ve seen .

    Steve.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I P9374 #1016804
    mackerel
    Participant

    And a big shout out for the HFL engineers who built P9374, and wont be there on the day.

    And what about one for others that played a big part in this ??!!

    Steve.

    in reply to: Miscellaneous Pictures 1967 #1019474
    mackerel
    Participant

    What my picture earlier in the thread indicates is that they were broken up further north, just north of the itchen bridge.

    Hi, I’ve just found some cine footage on you tube taken from red funnel ferry of the 2 princesses at calshot

    steve

    in reply to: Miscellaneous Pictures 1967 #1028515
    mackerel
    Participant

    What my picture earlier in the thread indicates is that they were broken up further north, just north of the itchen bridge.

    Hi, I’ve just found some cine footage on you tube taken from red funnel ferry of the 2 princesses at calshot

    steve

    in reply to: Miscellaneous Pictures 1967 #1019486
    mackerel
    Participant

    What my picture earlier in the thread indicates is that they were broken up further north, just north of the itchen bridge.

    There was certainly one if not two at calshot , but you may well be right about where they were broken up.

    Steve.

    in reply to: Miscellaneous Pictures 1967 #1028525
    mackerel
    Participant

    What my picture earlier in the thread indicates is that they were broken up further north, just north of the itchen bridge.

    There was certainly one if not two at calshot , but you may well be right about where they were broken up.

    Steve.

    in reply to: Miscellaneous Pictures 1967 #1019520
    mackerel
    Participant

    Think it was 1966 when I went to Southhampton and took the hovercraft across to Ryde, interesting journey. Remember seeing the 2 Saunders Roe Princess Fuselage hulks cocooned there. Got some slides I took at time (Kodachrome ,——somewhere here-in house) So I guess they must have been towed or a boat load back to Southampton to be scrapped. Shame !! as they were stored for many years.

    Anybody know any more about their final demise ? Nice pics !! HP 111

    Bill T.

    Hi I think you will find that the Hovercraft you took went to Cowes & not Ryde. I remember seeing them cocooned on the slipway at Cowes. I think they were broken up at Calshot Spit at the entrance to southampton water.

    Steve

    in reply to: Miscellaneous Pictures 1967 #1028560
    mackerel
    Participant

    Think it was 1966 when I went to Southhampton and took the hovercraft across to Ryde, interesting journey. Remember seeing the 2 Saunders Roe Princess Fuselage hulks cocooned there. Got some slides I took at time (Kodachrome ,——somewhere here-in house) So I guess they must have been towed or a boat load back to Southampton to be scrapped. Shame !! as they were stored for many years.

    Anybody know any more about their final demise ? Nice pics !! HP 111

    Bill T.

    Hi I think you will find that the Hovercraft you took went to Cowes & not Ryde. I remember seeing them cocooned on the slipway at Cowes. I think they were broken up at Calshot Spit at the entrance to southampton water.

    Steve

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #1022634
    mackerel
    Participant

    I assume that the emergency blow down bottle had been used ? But if up locks had failed to rotate enough to allow gear to come down would it make any differance ? I expect Bruce can tell me.

    Steve

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #1032205
    mackerel
    Participant

    I assume that the emergency blow down bottle had been used ? But if up locks had failed to rotate enough to allow gear to come down would it make any differance ? I expect Bruce can tell me.

    Steve

    mackerel
    Participant

    Whilst it is not a past time exclusive to (T) Spits to end up on their belly, it almost seems to be a rite of passage for restored a/c.

    Is there a possibility that the positioning of the front cockpit controls, to accommodate the rear cockpit, somehow compromises the operation of the landing gear?

    The IAC also had many wheels up incidents, could this be a Vickers design fault?

    Given the value of a Spit and the cost of repairs, could the design authority carry out a mod for T IXs.

    The undercarrage selector on a T9 is a different beast to a normal one. It sits on top of the datum longeron bracing channel. I think it is pushed forward to disengage the locks then pulled back towards pilot. I guess it could be awkward to operate as it sits next the curved cockpit combing skin.
    I havnt seen a T9 with conventional selector in front cockpit ! I think Supermarine still carry the design authority.

    Steve

    mackerel
    Participant

    Whilst it is not a past time exclusive to (T) Spits to end up on their belly, it almost seems to be a rite of passage for restored a/c.

    Is there a possibility that the positioning of the front cockpit controls, to accommodate the rear cockpit, somehow compromises the operation of the landing gear?

    The IAC also had many wheels up incidents, could this be a Vickers design fault?

    Given the value of a Spit and the cost of repairs, could the design authority carry out a mod for T IXs.

    The undercarrage selector on a T9 is a different beast to a normal one. It sits on top of the datum longeron bracing channel. I think it is pushed forward to disengage the locks then pulled back towards pilot. I guess it could be awkward to operate as it sits next the curved cockpit combing skin.
    I havnt seen a T9 with conventional selector in front cockpit ! I think Supermarine still carry the design authority.

    Steve

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 561 total)