dark light

mackerel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 561 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ID a part? #1149705
    mackerel
    Participant

    hi all, could be part of spitfire windscreen surround !

    Steve

    in reply to: Spitfire Internal Wing Structure Question. #1155236
    mackerel
    Participant

    Better pic…..

    Hi Mikehaspey , I think I’ve seen this photo before ! Pretty sure Steve Vizard asked me the same question last week !

    Steve
    ps I didnt know then either !! definately not bolts from an access hole because they are staked. If material was thicker i’d say that it was the perpex light or view hole on the aft end of the tank cover!!

    in reply to: Spitfire Internal Wing Structure Question. #1155429
    mackerel
    Participant

    spitfire wing internals

    Hi all, No 1 you wouldnt probably see green paint on internals of Mk 1 if original,maybe silver or no paint & No 2 yes lots of hex head bolts on wing internals. Photo would help !!

    Steve

    in reply to: A new sponsor and a new look for the Grace Spitfire #1158136
    mackerel
    Participant

    Its not unique – there are several like that including PT462 in Wales. The current mod was devised by Dick Melton in conjunction wth Nick Grace and first used on ML407 (although the Soviet Air Force was the first to put the concept in to action in WWII).

    Hi all, another reason for using this type of canopy is that the origional bulbus one are as rare as hens teeth. We are doing a T9 at the moment to be fitted with bulbus canopy but it looks like one is going to have to be made from scratch !!! unless some one on here knows where there is one going spare !!!!

    Steve

    in reply to: (Not so) Simple Spitfire Question ? #1158144
    mackerel
    Participant

    Any ‘new’ ones likely to fly again this year?

    Hi all, I can think of 12 or 13 more spits that will possably be in the air in 5yrs time pushing the number past 60 !!

    Steve

    in reply to: (Not so) Simple Spitfire Question ? #1159083
    mackerel
    Participant

    Yes Steve – I think your right – of course there is the other BMMF Mk 19 too?

    Mark V , I dont know what’s happening about other BBMF XIX, Fluffy could probably tell more!! Any way getting a bit off topic here, I think a good parameter for a current list of flyers would be to pick a point at the end of the last show season and any spits flying then to be included, also any on annuals or majors as these will be returning to the skys this year , hopefully !! maybe this could sort things out ? Or just confuse it more !!

    Steve

    in reply to: (Not so) Simple Spitfire Question ? #1159100
    mackerel
    Participant

    All the UK Mk 19’s can be called ‘dubious’ as they have a wing issue that may require some time to sort out (but exactly how much time – if its done within the normal ‘winter maintenance’ period its not an issue – Mackeral?)

    Hi Mark V, I think in the case of BBMF MKXIX this is going to be sorted out at ARCO with the work they are doing on her now. As for Rolls Royce i think this is going to take considerably longer because it seems to be more than just a spar issue !!

    Steve

    in reply to: Unknown – English Spitfire airplane #1097134
    mackerel
    Participant

    Is it possible that it is one of the planes I wrote down? (See above)

    Or is that 100% not possible?

    Hi Vin1, I think there is one person on this forum who will know the answer. Look out for MK12 !!

    Steve

    in reply to: Unknown – English Spitfire airplane #1097280
    mackerel
    Participant

    That tail flash running the full height of the fin looks more like something from an earlier date that any of yours. From memory it looks more like P9374, buried for so many years in the sands at Calais, but I can’t find a photograph at hand to confirm or deny this.
    X3485 is listed as a Wellington in my book, by the way.
    Welcome on board anyway, Vin, I’m sure someone will have nailed this before the night’s out: the level of expertise here is quite remarkable.

    Hi all, if this is P9374 then i think that there was more of the cockpit area left than that, also the prop blade that is vertical was missing from the prop hub.

    Steve.

    in reply to: Spitfire RM689 #1100640
    mackerel
    Participant

    Thanks very much for those… I was at Farnborough in ’86 and remember seeing a spit perform… the only vintage aircraft flying I think. I had remembered it being one with invasions stripes though, a Mk.IX if I remember correctly. Were two spits present, or am I chanelling memories from another show into those I have for Farnborough? Lovely to see these photos though… wonderful aircraft… so sad what happened to her and her pilot.

    Cheers,
    Richard

    Richard ,RM689 is a MKXIV not a MKIX.

    Steve

    in reply to: Wanted: BF-109 Airframe Pics and Drawings #1102318
    mackerel
    Participant

    109 fuse

    Chumpy’s photo shows just what I was getting at !!!

    Steve

    in reply to: Wanted: BF-109 Airframe Pics and Drawings #1102321
    mackerel
    Participant

    109 fuselage

    Hi, the rear fuselage of a 109 is made up of skins with the frames formed on the skin its self. There are 4 such items on each side of the fuse spaced by a skin with no frame on. This is then riveted to the skins with frames on and the whole lot in joined down the centre,( top & bottom) by stringers. There are also stringers that go the full lenght of the fuse through slots cut in the frames .

    Steve

    in reply to: Casa 2.111 #1102344
    mackerel
    Participant

    http://www.preservedaxisaircraft.com contains a list of all surviving Casa 2.111 and their (previous) identities.

    None of them fly anymore.

    Hi Kenneth, a real shame none of them are airworthy, the warbird scene could do with some of these being put back in the air !!

    Steve

    in reply to: Dilip Sarkars' Victory Books ? #1108303
    mackerel
    Participant

    Many thanks, Steve. MIA:RIP is a little outdated now, having been produced in 1998, but the chronology of recoveries to that point in time and legal interpretation still holds true. What a pity, though, that the ultimately officially undertaken operation to recover Eric Williams recently was unsuccessful…

    Hi Mr Sarkar, MIA-RIP still a good read as it was then. I got my copy throught the Frontline & Aviation museum set up by Steve, Mark & john Tickner in 1998/99 . As i worked for Steve during the day restoring spitfire bits & helping at the museum in the evening because my partner Caroline ran the place on a day to day basis, seems all i did for 2 years was live in the 1940’s ! Of course a lot of the stuff in the book was well documented in displays we had there. Shall have to get a copy of “The Few”.

    Steve.

    in reply to: Dilip Sarkars' Victory Books ? #1109436
    mackerel
    Participant

    Have just seen this thread and must comment.

    Unfortunately, due to an acrimonious divorce, I was left with no choice whatsoever but to wind up Victory Books in November 2007, which was a great blow as, having left the police in 2005 to write and publish full time, the enterprise was doing well and held great promise.

    I am now writing for Amberley PLC, owned by legendary historical publisher Alan Sutton. I will not, however, be engaging in any further book signings or, the moment having very much passed, and I am much enjoying a quieter life able to also pursue two other strong interests.

    For the record, having rebuilt my life these past couple of years I am now very happily pursuing a career as an academic historian and writer with a low to no public profile – the way I now like and intend to keep it.

    Hello Mr Sarkar, just to say how much i enjoyed reading your book “missing in action – Resting in peace”. All the more interesting knowing Steve Vizard & Mark Kirby. Thanks.

    Steve.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 561 total)