Trumper is right. So many times I’ve come here to say something, only to find Kev has not only beaten me to it, but said the same thing much more succinctly than I could ever hope to. Don’t go, Kev.
Is that what they call it now? 🙂
Wish we had a “Like” button here…
because the answear was not very helpful
If nothing else, I think this thread has coined a new term; “Answear” = An offensive or profane reply. (no offence, mig31bm. Enjoying the thread)
IMHO all this stuff about a Big Bang is just a fig leaf to hide the fact that, like the rest of us, our finest brains don’t really have a clue how it all started, where it came came from, etc.
Good stuff. Keep ’em coming, please!
Maybe the dog should count itself lucky…
http://www.lincolnshireecho.co.uk/ll-cheating-dog/story-20767790-detail/story.html
Correct; RTAF-4 Chantra (Moon) Photo taken at RTAF museum several years ago-
[ATTACH=CONFIG]225957[/ATTACH]
“I Didn’t Get Where I Am Today…” Autobiography of David Nobbs, creator of Reginald Perrin, A Bit of a Do, and the brilliant novel Second From Last In The Sack Race.
When we consider the design of the Lightning context is important. Remember the thinking around the specifications was derived from a realisation that no RAF fighter could intercept a large bomber flying at over 50’000ft at Mach 0.85
I think we also need to remember that the Lightning was evolved from the P.1 research aircraft. In other words, the vertical engine layout was originally chosen for its low drag/high speed characteristics, with no real thought (AFAIK) given to its suitability to a fighter.
I once read somewhere that Hawker Siddeley kept pushing a Trident derivative against the wishes of the MOD who wanted the HS801; all came to a head at some meeting when the MOD told them flatly that if they didn’t start listening, they would buy the Atlantic instead, and a HS man had to scurry back to Woodford (or wherever) to collect the HS801 drawings. How true or not, I’m not sure.
Hope things work out for you, Jim.
Thanks for the replies, folks; never imagined there would be so much interest. Can I just say “She was 26” was a purely hypothetical example to simply illustrate the point I was trying to make, and not an actual line from my book. I decided to change to numerals because there is one scene (an argument over someone’s age and the events in their life) where the unavoidable amount of hyphenated words (eg “Twenty-Six”) in such a short passage looked very untidy and clumsy.
Not sure I can really look to Shakespeare for guidance either, because of course language and styles have changed over the years; he may never have written “26” but then again I’d never write “Wherefore art thou?”
I think sticking rigidly to either all words or all numerals is likely to bring problems of its own, and the answer is to use your own feeling for what is ‘right’ whilst trying to remain as consistent as possible.
I reckon Simon & Garfunkel were better, but even they acknowledge the debt they have to the Everlys.
I reckon Simon & Garfunkel were better, but even they acknowledge the debt they have to the Everlys.
Thanks for the replies, Guys. Going to have to re-think this one…