dark light

Mr Creosote

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 1,719 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1840066
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    It happens, deal with it, in an intelligent manner.

    Such a manner does not include the sky-is-falling rhetoric and passing laws that only affect law abiding citizens while criminals laugh at the arrogance shown by poliiticans as they pass their new laws they do not give a damn about while being as useful as teats on a bore.

    Never. If I ever become so de-humanised (or “intelligent”? :confused:) that I can accept brutal mass-murders of primary school children as “just something that happens,” then they can take me outside and shoot me. I guess you’ve neatly proved my point though about these massacres being seen as a price worth paying for America to keep its lethal toys. I really have better ways of spending my time than wasting it on rubbish like this, so I’m out.

    in reply to: General Discussion #236613
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    You start dying the day you are born, some die at earlier ages due to nasty, whether crime or disease, circumstances. That is life, as humanity never changes, neither will that fact.

    So it doesn’t really matter that 20 young kids are blown to smithereens, because they were going to die sooner or later anyway? Ye Gods…

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1840306
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    You start dying the day you are born, some die at earlier ages due to nasty, whether crime or disease, circumstances. That is life, as humanity never changes, neither will that fact.

    So it doesn’t really matter that 20 young kids are blown to smithereens, because they were going to die sooner or later anyway? Ye Gods…

    in reply to: General Discussion #237056
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    I really don’t see the point in these arguments about whether, technically, a weapon is legally or illegally held. More weapons in circulation (compared to elsewhere) = more chance of one falling into the wrong hands =more American children slaughtered. Until America has the collective balls to face up to this simple but unpalatable fact and begin reining in gun ownership, it will just go on and on. As I’ve said here before -and I’m still waiting for someone to disprove or even deny it- America seems to regard it as a price worth paying in order to maintain its unhealthy relationship with firearms. Wouldn’t be entirely surprised to hear of yet another school shooting in the run-up to Christmas, though I sincerely hope I’m wrong.

    As an aside, I read recently that Lyndon Johnson had on his Texas ranch a “40ft high hunting blind flanked by banks of powerful searchlights that Johnson would switch on, blinding his prey (usually a deer, I believe) for an easy shot.” Can someone please explain to me how that is in any way “sport” and not just blood lust?

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1840777
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    I really don’t see the point in these arguments about whether, technically, a weapon is legally or illegally held. More weapons in circulation (compared to elsewhere) = more chance of one falling into the wrong hands =more American children slaughtered. Until America has the collective balls to face up to this simple but unpalatable fact and begin reining in gun ownership, it will just go on and on. As I’ve said here before -and I’m still waiting for someone to disprove or even deny it- America seems to regard it as a price worth paying in order to maintain its unhealthy relationship with firearms. Wouldn’t be entirely surprised to hear of yet another school shooting in the run-up to Christmas, though I sincerely hope I’m wrong.

    As an aside, I read recently that Lyndon Johnson had on his Texas ranch a “40ft high hunting blind flanked by banks of powerful searchlights that Johnson would switch on, blinding his prey (usually a deer, I believe) for an easy shot.” Can someone please explain to me how that is in any way “sport” and not just blood lust?

    in reply to: General Discussion #237820
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    Massacres have zero to do with gun control, except as a chicken-little tool to try to scare the ignorant or paranoid public that they occur simply because guns exist.

    No connection then between a high rate of gun ownership and a high rate of gun misuse?

    in reply to: U.S.A Second Amendment re-think #1841378
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    Massacres have zero to do with gun control, except as a chicken-little tool to try to scare the ignorant or paranoid public that they occur simply because guns exist.

    No connection then between a high rate of gun ownership and a high rate of gun misuse?

    in reply to: General Discussion #240455
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]223436[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Amazon "Octocopter" delivery drones. #1843471
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]223436[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: (Yet) more Dreamliner issues… #503566
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    Rightly or wrongly, the world at large is going to see this as another “Dreamliner” problem, and to be fair the meeja are hardly likely to print stories about aero engine problems without mentioning the aircraft they power. To most people, the engines are just another part of the Boeing aircraft and they have no interest in who made them, any more than if it were (for example) an IFE issue; as such it is inevitably going to be seen as Boeing’s problem. Not fair, but as others have said, the 787 is fundamentally a great aircraft, and will ride all this out.

    in reply to: General Discussion #242232
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    Doctor Who was part of my childhood back in the sixties, and I can still remember the Saturday afternoon TV line up of wrestling on World of Sport, Doctor Who, and Jukebox Jury. The thing labelled Doctor Who now though seems to bear little relationship to the programme I knew. Think I liked Jon Pertwee best, and couldn’t stand David Tennant with all that over-acting and those manic eyes.

    in reply to: Doctor Who! #1844927
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    Doctor Who was part of my childhood back in the sixties, and I can still remember the Saturday afternoon TV line up of wrestling on World of Sport, Doctor Who, and Jukebox Jury. The thing labelled Doctor Who now though seems to bear little relationship to the programme I knew. Think I liked Jon Pertwee best, and couldn’t stand David Tennant with all that over-acting and those manic eyes.

    in reply to: General Discussion #243218
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    Eee yow were looky to live in’ t paper bag. We joost lived in’t tank w’out uz clothes on an’ wit sewerages reet over uz heeds.

    Luxury…

    in reply to: Monty Python reuniting! #1845716
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    Eee yow were looky to live in’ t paper bag. We joost lived in’t tank w’out uz clothes on an’ wit sewerages reet over uz heeds.

    Luxury…

    in reply to: General Discussion #244291
    Mr Creosote
    Participant

    It has been regularly repeated on ITV4 I think it is and very welcome too. Never palls. Would love to see Ripping Yarns which I don’t think has ever been repeated. We had a now unplayable VHS for many years.

    You can get Ripping Yarns DVD’s quite reasonably priced on Ebay. Recently read books of the transcripts. Brilliant stuff; where else would you find lines like “I know you! You’re Jean-Pierre Olthwaite’s lad!” ?

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 1,719 total)