It’s fine in my copy. Do you have any addon scenery installed?

Define…”is great”…?

I spent £600 (Convert to $ as you wish!) and it runs FSX terribly. I know people who spent twice that and it runs acceptably.

I suppose it depends in whether you want it to look good or not 🙂

I fear, being 19, I am too young to enter into this topic. However, even over the past few years, I can see just how far Britain has gone downhill.

Again we’re back to limiting destinations to only a few places. If I wanted to fly to New York, I’d have to go to Heathrow, then to Dubai, then to New York. Right?

To say “I’d only fly on an A380” is preposterous (Sp?) – That’s like saying “I’ll only walk on black pavement” when 99% of the pavement in your locality is grey paving slabs!

Not sure if that question was directed at me or the OP, but I’ll give my answer! Because I have about 100FPS in FS9, to have those setting in FSX I get…ermmm…12 🙂

FSX has stunning graphics if you turn them up, but you need a powerful processor, a lot of memory and a fast graphics card to run it!

[QUOTE=PMN;1704671Incidentally stretching the upper deck on the 747 had an unexpected advantage – it improved aerodynamics and increased the cruise speed slightly, so maybe the further stretch of the 747-8 has its advantages aerodynamically.[/QUOTE]
If they keep going they’ll have the first super-cruise capable airliner then!

The -400 can reach .93 if needs be, .889 usually, so I can’t wait for the -8I’s (Now stands for “Incredible”, by the way!) figures.

Paris should be good, if it comes (The -8F will do!)

Works fine for me richard.

Yes, it does.

Looks something like this, too.

http://chrisglobe.com/hosting/images/sky3cpc.png