It looks like what CVF should look like.;)
More like Fan art mixing a DDH-22 with a CVN and guessing at a CVF size
Maybe CVF as a basis for a gas turbine powered Conventional Aircraft Carrier going off recent posts in the Naval Aviation subforum and the JASDF F-35 threads ?
One possible avenue is the AEW Merlin for their new ‘DDH’ Helicopter Carriers as they use the Utility version for minesweeping. Engines is a possible area too with maratime gas turbines and possible aeroengines.
Not necessarily. The MN commanded about 60 Rafale M because they expected to operate at term at least 2 aircraft carrier.With the plan for the second aircraft carrier falling through, they may be more than willing to “lease” a few to the RN.
The only reason why this will almost never happen is political not technical or cost.
Interim solutions have a way of becoming permanent, and the UK cannot pull out of the F-35 program, that would make the plane more expansive for the other nations that may follow the lead of Australia and RN into looking at alternative etc. The US won’t allow it. So it’s more likely the RN will get between 3 or 6 early production model F-35C/B in 2020 and will have to wait until later for anything else.
Actually Dave were only signed up for the R&D, we’ve been in from the start which means we have a very good idea on how the program is going and if it will meet our requirements. Two important elements of the UK JCA requirement is Cost and Schedule, if either exceed our acceptable margins then we are well withn our rights to review the selection. The UK is not like most customers where the F-35 is the crux of their airpower, we already have the Typhoon for the primary roles, the JCA is a carrier capable aircraft to complement the Typhoons
Somehow i suspect the first aircraft to trap & cat will be in British markings, with a British Pilot even if its just for the occasion.:rolleyes:
+1 Fedaykin
Go to agree with you there mate, that sounds more an overall review of the options rather than a switch back.
The BBC report mentions costs upto 1.2 billion to convert a CVF, but that was the figure quoted by Admiral Hussain at the select committee meeting last summer so thats not a drastic price increase and is built into the rise from 5 to 7 billion for the carriers. Its the aircraft that are providing the headaches now!
Its coming out now as they need to set the budget for decisions made next year, which is when they will have a clearer idea of the F-35C performance, issues and cost after the Arrestor hook has been tested again, Sea Trials on a CVN (If the hook fix does work and meets specifications) together with a better understanding on how the deferred USN orders will effect the bringing into service of the F-35C as a carrier aircraft and what impact that will have on the unit cost.
To early to tell as yet, they do accept there is a capability gap there at present and may be filled by our Allies, b a joint venture with our allies, by new technology, by re-tasking existing hardware or possibly buying into new kit.
We may some clearer thinking on the matter in the 2015 SDSR possibly with some form of interim solution with an eye to the 2020 SDSR for a long term solution.
I see in the Military Aircraft News 2012 thread that Russia has now ordered Mig-29K carrier aircraft for its Navy
no worries, F-35A has an internal gun
Its just the F-35B needing an external pod because it has a huge sophisticated weed blower behind the cockpit.
The F-35C has an external gun as per the F-35B as i think the refuelling probe uses the space for the Gun
Old F-18A/C would probably not be fit to use on carriers, due to fatigue issues. AFAIK ex-carrier aircraft can carry on for a while from land bases but it’s a bad idea to subject old, well-used airframes to catapult take-offs & carrier landings.
Yeap those carrier actions would soon expose any fatigue or failures in the aircraft.
Plus the RCAF will probably need them to maintain their exisiting fleet of F-18’s untill the F-35A is able to replace them.
In answer to the original question then yes both are failures as its taken way too long to get them into service considering they were intened as 90’s aircraft for the start of the new millenium.
Sure they eventually become regular frontline helicopters but they have failed to meet their original mandate forcing legacy aircraft to remain in service much longer than expected.
Is there anyway to overcome the door gunner problem short of a redesign of the helicopter?
Hind Style doors i suppose, unlike the Blackhawk the NH-90 has a rear loading ramp so not really possible to have the doors slide the other way due to the undercarriage sponsons
I rather doubt we would hear enything about Hawkeyes or stopgap JCA aircraft to cover the potential F-35C shortfall untill the 2015 SDSR.
We may get a clue to the MOD’s thinking when the initial order for F-35C production aircraft is placed next year as the numbers, in-service date and cost should indicate if they will be available in the numbers required when Carrier Strike is due to start.
By next year the UK should have a clearer idea of the capabilities, progress and outstanding issues of the F-35C along with a timetable of the USN introduction of the type as this will be a factor for the UK usage. No doubt this decision is probably timed to occur after the first F-35C sea trials to ensure that if they are successful they can announce more good news and if they are not then they can announce a review of the program instead.
I can’t see them cancelling the aircraft unless the US curtails the F-35C variant but i can see them looking for a potential stopgap should the need arise and no doubt that will be tied in progress made on the Carrier cooperation deals with the US & France.
I muse thusly:
If UKGov says to France “….we should be in a position to think about our joint UCAV seriously by next year.”
Is that tacit acceptance that both Neuron and Taranis will run very short, very efficient flight trials before feeding into this new programme, or is it an indication that Taranis is already in the air?
Neither have flown as yet, i think you will find both are more just technology demonstrators to prove the airframes can be designed, built and flown. Their initial data will then feed back into the joint UCAV program so they can determine a viable specification whilst the testing continues through the course of the next year.
I suspect the general idea is to determine a specification, set a requirement and have the joint BAE/Dassault team design a solution ready to be ordered after the 2015 SDSR as they should have a clear indication of capabilities, cost and timeline
It’s also true that the plan to build these tankers under labour was more or less the same, foreign yards! His statement is rank hypocrisy.
Yeap the current Labour crew appear to be in denial of the actual mess they left behind in terms or procurement chaos and whopping great funding shortfall for the things they had signed up to.
Anyway good news about the Tankers and that we’ll get 4 straight off, i suspect the stores ships will come in the next SDSR so they will be ready to support the Naval force 2020.
One aspect about the new Tankers is the flight deck & hanger, great news for giving the ability to operate with its own aircraft, especially when they undertake Guardship duties but it does make you wonder what helicopters we actually have available for VERTREP duties once the Seakings are gone as its seems a wasteful use of an ASW Merlin and the ? Commando Merlin are likley to be needed elsewhere ?