Enough. Start a new thread.
… Uganda P.166
That’s a P.149, a P.166 is a funny looking twin-pushprop light transport/utility thingie.
Some guys are just so easy 😉
I’m always eager to respond to such a friendly invitation, you should know by now 😀 I’m always a tad disappointed to find out that my on-topic comment never seems to inspire a similar response from certain not-quite-so-easy guys.
Thanks Dis – a B-18 with a new fuselage then 😉
Slightly off topic: who is that Schopenhauer-lookalike you have as avatar?
What do you want to hear? Although Putin is definately no stranger to macchiavellian schemes both inside Russia and across his borders and he is a staunch supporter of Yanukovich, pointing fingers to Moscow for Yushchenko’s poisoning is pure speculation. Ukrainian politics haven’t been clean for the last few years either. Current president Kuchma has been linked to a number of intimidations, molestations and even killings as well. If either one of you had actually been reading up on Ukraine, you would have known.
As for the comment-provoking remark
Here’s an indication that democracy won’t come easily to a region that didn’t have any for most of the 20th Century.
, do you want me to apply this to Iraq and Afghanistan 😉 ?
Doesn’t the Bolo have a deeper fuselage?
Belarus’ Su-25s? Nothing special about those, except maybe that they carry their bort numbers on the tail as well.
There is a late WAPJ with Georgian L29s.
Syria does not have Su-27s, although one was demonstrated in Damascus with -reportedly- Syrian markings.
Yemen doesn’t have Flankers either.
The wreck of Hunter F4 N-112 (c/n 44-30399) still was at Biak in 1989, there was a picture of it in Onze Luchtmacht iirc.
There are a few more former-Dutch aircraft surviving in Indonesia mentioned at http://www.vankaathoven.nu/Indonisia.HTM
The units Tenthije mentiones above were at Biak in 1962, when the Dutch finally left New Guinea. Before that, the following was also based at Biak:
1955:
321 Squadron Catalina Biak, New Guinea (previously operated by 7sqn)
1960:
7 Squadron Firefly Biak, New Guinea
321 Squadron Mariner Biak, New Guinea (considering the Dutch lost 3 Mariners in the area, there might be some wreckage of those around as well).
Also present in 1962 was 6 Squadron with the Firefly 4.
I agree with that in general. But the advertised and shown performance of PVO was very erratic. “The intercept” of Rust and his landing on the red square was hardly one. The Cessna did not carry kyrillic signs, all western flights at that time had to follow preset flight routes, flight levels, a russian “navigator” and reporting points. General sectretary Gorbatschov asked for the “head” of the defence minister after that successfull intercept!!! 🙂
After the outcry after KAL007, it isn’t too hard to imagine that there was reluctance to shoot down an obviously civilian intruder like a C172. There also was a little more room for personal initiative in the PVO than is often claimed – although i don’t know all the details, the decision not to shoot was probably taken at quite a low level. Even more so, it’s very likely that the non-threatening nature of Rust’s Cessna was the reason why the alert and interception of this intruder was kept inside the lower echelons of the PVO rather than a full alert throughout the Baltic and Moscow TVDs.
One of the other “successfull” intercepts. How did the PVO pilots manage that with their AAMs? Just two pax killed and landing the 707 on a frozen lake.
It was an R60 hit on an outer engine. KAL007 was hit by a radar-guided R98R in the rear fuselage/tail.
Ramachandran, stop making personal comments or you’ll get this thread locked.
Did Israeli F-4E’s have CCIP bomb aiming at the time? I’m asking because even in the USAF only very few F-4E’s in the active USAF (the last ones with 4TFW/Seymour Johnson AFB in fact didn’t) ever got CCIP bombing but relied on dive toss/CCRP targeting.
Sens, i was talking about a possible reason for the totally absurd navigation “error” from KAL007, not about the Soviet’s late response to that. The reaction to the intrusion into their airspace was definately far too late, and that is of course why the Far Eastern PVO was purged after the shootdown. But such a late response from the Soviets wasn’t all that new: a few months before the KAL007 incident, the USN flew a whole lot of carrier-based jets over the disputed island (the Soviets took it after WW2, Japan never agreed to that) of Zeleny in the southern Kurilles. There was no PVO response then either – it’s absolutely true that the readiness of the PVO on the Pacific rim left a lot to be desired in the early 1980s.
That doesn’t mean the whole PVO was that ineffective though. The intercepts of the KAL 707 in 1978, the shootdown of an Iranian RF-4E, the shootdown of an intruding CL44 and the intercept of Matthias Rust shows that around the same time the PVO elsewhere were quite up to their job.
“Originally Posted by Arthur
Rust got company twice during his flight over Russia: once by two Hinds, and once by MiG-23s.”Hinds maybe. But Floggers? The Cessna 172 traveled near the ground at 100 knots!!!!!
That’s why the Hinds eventually joined the Cessna: the Floggers couldn’t keep up, they had to circle around. Remember that one of the changes made in the Soviet PVO after the Rust incident was that Hinds were given a minor job in air-defense against slow-moving targets. Remember that hot-air balloon shot down over Belarus by Hinds in 1995?
Thank you, but I used the first name given, claimed to be the shooting pilot.
Have you an idea, when the name of major Gennadi Osipovich was given the first time?
Who had been the main “benefitor” of such “navigation errors”. Did a shoot down prevented this?
The only name i ever knew regarding the KAL007 shootdown was Osipovich, flying a Su-15TM bort 17red. I never heard about any pilot called Kasmin – in fact, from all the aircraft scrambled to intercept KAL007 that night (first scrambles where when the Boeing crossed Kamchatka), only Osipovich in his Flagon got within visual range. I believe Osipovich’ name was published early on in the investigation.
The most credible excuse i read for deliberate airspace intrusions (meaning a real ‘spy flight’ from KAL007) was for the Boeing to trigger a new over-the-horizon radar the Soviets had just finished in the Irkutsk area. The Soviets claimed this was a space telemetry radar (which it in fact was), the US claimed/feared it was an ABM radar which would have been in violation of the ABM treaty. Considering the fact that the radar was facing to the north-east (looking at Alaska if you will), it’s easy to understand the US suspicion. The spy-theory behind KAL007 was for the Boeing to trigger that radar, in order for the present fleet of US ELINT assets in the area (RC-135s, EP-3s and a number of ships where in the region at the time) to get information about the new radar.
Of course, with this in mind the shootdown wouldn’t have helped the Soviets in any way since the 747 was completely passive in it’s job. However, considering the tensions of the time it’s not too hard to imagine that the Soviets thought the aircraft was actively gathering information, either as an RC-135 or possibly as a covert ‘civilian’ 747. If the latter had been the case, shooting the aircraft down would have ment that the intelligence would have been lost.
Didn’t the crew of the AEGIS ship screw up by going full auto with the AEGIS system, which then proceeded to blow away the unidentified (and therefore classified as hostile) aircraft?
Yes, but there was a human operator visually keeping contact with the Airbus. For some reason this operator got so confused he read the aircraft’s altitude as the distance of the aircraft to the cruiser.
There was something on TV here about that incident a few weeks back. Is it true that there was a large lack of bodies recovered from the crash site?
Hardly any bodies were found. But as the 747 appearantly desintegrated before impact, the bodies were completely exposed in the water which made them easy food for bait eaters. Plenty of spider crabs in those waters.
I thought Rust’s Cessna was trailed by a few Hinds at one point and it was decided that the guy obviously wasn’t a threat?
Rust got company twice during his flight over Russia: once by two Hinds, and once by MiG-23s.