KAL007 was shot down by mjr. Gennadi Osipovich, not some guy named Kasmin.
Don’t forget that KAL’s history with espionage over the Soviet Union is somewhat dubious. In 1978 a KAL 707 was already forced down after straying into the restricted airspace over the Kola peninsula. You would have guessed that navigation would have been given some more priority on future flights…
Operation Bolo!
– Yep, MiG-31 rear office.
– It’s a Thai F-16.
– The radar is a German WW2 Würzburg, some of which were appearantly made with scrap from the Graf Zeppelin airship (you guess which of the two radars i’m talking about 😉 ).
– The one cockpit is indeed a Su-25 (don’t know if it’s a K, but could very well be), and i would guess the other one is indeed a Skorpion.
– The Hind is a Soviet one, it was the one which visited the UK in the very early 1990s or so for the Helimeet at Redhill. It’s a Mi-24P.
Can’t help you with the yoke-cockpit and the USAAAAAAF thingie, sorry.
In about each and every garden complex near Eastern Block airbases, you can find dozens of external fuel tanks (mostly of the stubby sort, as on the MiG-15) as water tanks. Also quite a number of An-2 fuselages as sheds.
…The thing that concerns me about the EA-18G is the range it has compared to the EA-6B. Will it be able to stay on station as long as the Prowler despite being a faster platform?
No, of course not.
And most certainly not when the Growlard uses it’s speed “advantage”.
They shouldn’t buy aircraft, they should rebuild Zeljava and rent it out 🙂
Well that’s interesting, that picture doesn’t resemble the “A-5B” shown in the Aerofax MiG-19 book.
That would be an unpainted Q-5 with a bigger radome, sort of like a small F-4C nose? I think that was a one-off trials aircraft, never to see service. There are a number of pics showing operational Q-5s with the radome as the one i posted above. Considering the Q-5B only had a small range-finding, it would easily fit in a small cone like on 10769.
Don’t forget that the Aerofax MiG-19 book is by Yefim Gordon. If he only were as informed on operational and non-Russian matters as well as he is on the design bureaus…
The BiH UH-1H’s aren’t anywhere near to being operational. In 2003 only three out of the 15 delivered remained airworthy, with no spares to keep those three in the air for any serious amount of time.
As for equipping the BiH air force: get a bunch of additional Hips, and possibly some Hinds and light trainer/utility helos. A token force of fighters is absolutely useless for both BiH and the Republika Srpska, especially considering the terrain. The Serbs still have their handful of Galebs and Oraos on strength, but their operational readiness isn’t much better than that of the BiH Irokez (their nick for the Hueys)…
Besides, what good is an air force if you need to file each and every flight at least one day in advance at IFOR (now an EU operation, which probably means even more bureaucracy compared to last month when it was still a NATO thingie).
That picture Flogger posted of a Q-5 with an obviously non-standard nose looks similar to the Q-5B torpedo bomber project for the PLANAF.
This is what a Q-5B should look like, although it’s not a PLANAF machine. It’s, also at the Datang Shan museum (unfortunately not yet there when i visited the place). Pic via Xinhui at CDF.
A fair enough assertion. But does require more digging: What are the antecedents of the Super-7?
CATIC, the J-7 and Grumman, see the Jane’s scan posted by Sens.
My apologies then, Canpark!
Arthur, IIRC, the designation MiG-21F was used for the Czech-made MiG-21s, produced at Letnany, which had the rearview canopy window deleted. They have found their ways to some other countires as exports, as well.
Was it officially without the ‘-13’ bit, or did they just use the MiG-21F designation for shorthand? Remember that the original MiG-21F was only built in very small numbers, so it was probably a lot easier just to leave out the “-13” bit because it wouldn’t cause any confusion anyway.
Also… i thought they were built as S.106 rather than MiG-21?
I also remember the Mongolian MiG-21PFMs being bare-metal, but I also remember them having three digit niumbers starting with zero, e.g. 018. 012 etc. which was unusual for VVS SSSR birds. The pic probably remains a mystery…
Yep, the three-digit numbers are confusing me too. Although training bases with the VVS did have three-digit bort numbers. The pic could for example also be taken at Barnaul where they had a training base with camouflaged MiG-21PFMs with three-digit bort numbers.
Oh, and i got the MiG-29 CD-ROM in the mail two weeks ago. Excellent, my compliments!
IIRC the mjority of MiG-21F-13’s only had a single gun.
With two guns, they are plain MiG-21F. One gun was removed to cater for the wiring for the R-13 missile, hence the F-13 designation.
Canpark,
Are you sure those MiG-21PFM’s are Mongolian? I seem to remember that Mongolian MiG-21s were bare metal, and not camouflaged.
The FC-1 is the evolved Super-7, period. Earlier Chinese reports actually use both the name S-7 and FC-1 for the very same project. Tiger01’s quote describes the K-8, and has nothing to do with the FC-1.
That IAR-95 link is pathetically dragged out, by the way. Wolverine is absolutely right on that one.
Tiger, Saleem, Desert Fox, Arshad and others, stay on topic and stop getting personal.