PLA, Golden Arrow, your points have been made. Enough on this.
GA – i added your next post to your previous one, to finish it (for now).
I don’t think mute people should be the right to make phonecalls. And if someone, apart from being mute, qualifies to work in a callcentre…
ZA465/FK, flew with 16sqn from Laarbruch before being painted desert pink and finally leaving for the Gulf on January 4th, 1991. It got based at Tabuk there under the provisional 16sqn as well. There is a bit on it at http://www.flyingmule.com/products/CG-AA33602 but it’s not entirely accurate, for example stating that it flew from Brüggen rather than Laarbruch (other websites make that mistake too). I guess it changed codes a number of times when at Laarbruch too, but i’d have to check my logs for that… which is not going to happen since i’m far too lazy and chaotic. Sorry 😉
After Laarbruch’s Tornado wing was withdrawn, ZA465 first flew for some time with 17sqn at Brüggen and then went to St. Athan for conversion to Tornado GR.1B. With this it became one of the replacemtents for the Bucc in the anti-shipping role. It’s final unit was 12sqn from Lossiemouth (it also flew with 617sqn from that base), with it’s last code there being FF. As such it is now preserved at Duxford.
Russia always attacked China, not the other way around. Russia wouldn’t have such a long disputed border with China if Russians had not taken land from Asians all the way to the Chinese border. Russia is the one European colonial state from the 19th century that has kept its colonial possessions. Britain, France and Spain had all given theirs up.
All true about Russia’s emperialist expansion into Asia, but the Amur border clashes were in fact started by the PRC, not Russia. It can be argued that the Primorye region has got as little to do with (Han-)China as it does with Russia. An independent Manchuria or even Korea could make more credible claims than either Beijing or Taipei.
China has far, far more reason to be afraid of Russia.
Hardly, the Russian Far East has a dwindling population. Demographics are definately in China’s favour if China wants to go expansionist in the area. Or re-expansionist, if you will 😉
The US and NATO attacking Russia? The US is more likely to involved in a war with China over Taiwan than anything with Russia. I see very little recent news from the Pentagon calling Russia a military threat.
There are lots of American reports of Russia being a “security” threat because of fears that Russian control of its nuclear stockpile is unprofessional and in constant danger of being sold to terrorists.
But that is different from US targeting of the Russian military. There is absolutely no chance of war between the US/NATO and Russia unless Russia invades Poland or Scandanavia.
There is one big problem though: dishonesty on NATO side. The one condition under which the Soviet Union agreed to the reunification of Germany was that NATO would not expand further eastward. While hardly ever believed in the West, the Soviet Union/Russia has been very weary of an overland attack ever since the early 19th century (in less than 150 years Russia had no less than 5 attacks on it’s territory courtesy of Western powers) and still has a bit of a trauma here. The Warsaw Pact was far more a defensive organisation for Russia than the West (or even China) cared for to know, and the countries in Eastern Europe provided with a nice buffer.
Now NATO hasn’t only expanded into former Soviet territory (the Baltic states), but NATO has established bases in other CIS states (Georgia, Kirgyzstan) as well. It’s not too hard to see some justification in Russian fears for Western expansionism, as the West has been repeatedly screwing the Russians West and South over the last fifteen years.
Americans would never expect the 1st Marines Division or the 82nd Airborne to fighting to fighting insurgents (who do appear from time to time in the US.)
The US has used the National Guard a number of times to keep civil unrest down in recent history, with an occasional excess like Kent State in 1970. Also, in 1958 the 82nd Airborne Division was used to give black students the chance to get some non-segregated education in 1958 in Little Rock, Arkansas. There was no fighting, but an ‘insurgency’ wasn’t ruled out.
So unless the Russian Army views muslims as non-citizens, using it for internal strife is a fine way to mess up your armed forces morale and sense of mission.
True, but then again the ‘first line’ troops the Russians have against internal insurgents are MVD troops, not the regular army.
Over the last 20 years or so, there have actually been a few years when Afghani heroin production was cut back significantly… Fortunately for those inspired by films like Trainspotting, the Taliban has been removed so smack production in Afghanistan is now higher than ever. But then again, The War Against Drugstm has been mostly replaced by The War Against selected Terrorismtm so it remainst to be seen if the State Department is going to fly Bronco cropdusters from Bagram or Shindand.
A quick read on the matter at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2814861.stm
the situation cant be too good if crated Libyan spares are purchased in preference to french made ones.
Lybian spares are made in France too, you know.
Eighteen Bolivian T-birds (mostly ex-French T-33SFs built by Canadair) were upgraded by Kelowna in Canada from 1998 on. The upgrade consisted of modernised avionics, a glass cockpit and some structural work to give a few more flight hours to those airframes. They have also bought eight ex-Equador T-33s in 2001, but it has to be seen if those will actually see some flying since those have been in open storage in Equador since 1996. There is no upgrade planned for those anyway.
I don’t think all upgraded T-33s have been delivered yet, as there was some stupid legal dispute between the US and Canada about rights for remanufacturing the engine. Anyway, Bolivia is hoping to get 18 TA-4J’s from the US to replace the T-birds with.
Time for me to have that rant again.
Can someone please tell the next of kin that a whole bunch of anonymous people whom they’ve never heard of are offering their sincere condoleances here?
:rolleyes: Those pilots had a job (an interesting one at that), and suffered a job-related accident with injuries incompatible with life. They and their relatives knew that risk, and unless one of the victims was a personal acquintance of one of the members here i can’t see why we have this collective cry’n’condoleance sessions every time a plane crashes.
I doubt the many car-related webforums have such a thread every time someone dies in a car crash either.
Looks like one of the new Bell 412EPs to me, PLA…nice find.
I beg to differ Steve. The exhaust looks like a single-engined Huey to me, with the extension upwards to counter the helo’s IR signature. A UH-1H/Huey II if you ask me.
Interesting similarity in paint scheme to some of the US Department of State’s Aviation Wing choppers…including the Huey IIs at Quetta…
😉
“government to government arms sales,” was the term used in the article Arthur…
Which is not the same as a company to government arms sale… which would be the case if it was a non-FMS deal directly with Lockheed. And with a government-to-government deal, the snippets Steve digs out from the Washington catacombs are the thing to go by.
It’s appearantly going to continue flying, but not without refit. XV208 will have it’s probe and overhead radome removed and get stretched to become a standard C-130H-30 for the Dutch airforce.
From Touchdown News, in a perfectly messy Yahoogroups layout:
The 3rd Herc for the Dutch Air Force (ex XV208) will enter service in 2005
already. It will be converted to the same C-130H-30 standard as the other two.
This means it will be lengthened with two new sections to the fuselage.— In [email]Touchdown-News@yahoogroups.com[/email], “jhartman@x”
wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> An interesting thread has developed at the Scramble Messageboard…
>
> People NOT ABLE to read Dutch, please click at
>
>
http://scramble.ykoon.nl/viewtopic.php?t=10345&sid=4eac3240abb3a93e3a1
311f3a
> 7bc1647
> or at
> http://tinyurl.com/66vl2 if the link was broken…
>
> The thread above started with this text:
>
> “The Dutch MoD announced that they will purchase another (third)
Hercules.
> This C-130 will be purchased from the RAF and is quite similar to the other
> two C-130 already operating for the RNLAF with the 334 Sqn. This plane
will
> enter service mid 2006 and eventually two Fokker 60 will be put out of
> service.
> In the end all four Fokker 60’s will be phased out and a fourth C-130 will
> replace those last two sixties.”
>
>
> More info (in Dutch) can be found at
> http://tinyurl.com/6ce5t (RNLAF official press statement)
> and
> http://tinyurl.com/7yab5 (an official document to Dutch Parliament)
>
> Persistent rumours link the plan for a third Royal Netherlands Air Force
> C-130 with ex-RAF Hercules XV208, which is indeed Hercules W.2
“Snoopy” ,
> the former “weather bird” of the RAE and its successor…
> But in what condition is she currently at Boscombe Down, and how much
would
> it cost to convert her back to “transport configuration”??
>
> The possible acquisition of a Portuguese C-130 has also been mooted
several
> times.
> The Dutch Ministry of Defence has sold five Lockheed P-3C Orions to
> Portugal for about 70 million Euros…
> Perhaps a deal was struck?
>
>
> Regards
> Erik Jan Hartman
Possible deliveries of F-16s is not a fantasy, but until you know variants & numbers i’d back of on the future OrBat theories. The reports so far speak of transfer: at best those would be block 30 C/Ds, which are hardly modern.
Please stop the fantasies guys.
3Wing (not Fighter Wing, sorry) has more than just the two air defence Eagle squadrons though:
3Wg, Elmendorf AFB
12 FS – F-15C(V2) – yellow
19 FS – F-15C/D – black
90 FS – F-15E – red
517 AS – C-12F, C-12J, C-130H – white
962AACS – E-3B/C – green
Naah, the Storch doesn’t have a large enough fuselage :dev2: Although it’s production in Germany, France and Czechoslovakia does make it an interesting pan-European design…