dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,941 through 2,955 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Worst advert on TV?? #1956524
    Arthur
    Participant

    What about all the adverts that portray men as juvenille, ineffective or just plain stupid. The women, meanwhile are sassy, switched on, not to say rather smug. What about the Heinekin ad…

    Only men who can’t write Heineken are juvenile, ineffective or just plain stupid. The rest is OK :dev2:

    in reply to: IDEAS 2004 news #2633944
    Arthur
    Participant

    Not as a correspondent. Joris Janssen-Lok (now does some shipping bits for Jane’s) started out there pretty young too.

    in reply to: IDEAS 2004 news #2634107
    Arthur
    Participant

    PLA,
    Discussing the article on IDEAS and the credibility of the Jane’s correspondent who wrote it is well within the scopes of the topic.

    in reply to: What will Snappers next rant be about? #1957322
    Arthur
    Participant

    Those photographers sure know how to give a nice look to a post, don’t you think? Very visual.

    in reply to: Top Five Historic Jet Fighters #1407024
    Arthur
    Participant

    Historic significance?
    Meteor/Me-262
    F-86/MiG-15
    F-4 Phantom (first multirole)
    MiG-21 (supersonic for the masses)
    MiG-25 (starting a berserk Überfighter-armsrace which lead to the F-15, then to the Su-27 series, now to the F-22).

    Because me like?
    Hunter
    Buccaneer
    MiG-23
    MiG-25
    AJ-37 and other Viggens in splinter camo
    F-4 Phantom
    Vautour.

    in reply to: The taking of Diego Garcia #2070115
    Arthur
    Participant

    Does anyone have a clue why the airbase at Diego Garcia was built when the RAF was just leaving RAF Gan on Addoo atol in the Maldives?

    in reply to: Indian air force Mirage 2000 crashes. 23 Sept. 2004 #2634613
    Arthur
    Participant

    Greece knows how to revive Mirages – there’s also the one that ditched and brought back to life.

    in reply to: Russian Air Force Status #2634659
    Arthur
    Participant

    Isn’t the Mig-29S the Fulcrum-C, the main in-service Mig-29 with the VVS.

    The MiG-29S is a FULCRUM-C, but a FULCRUM-C is not necessarily a MiG-29S.

    in reply to: Isreal Forces Lufthansa Jet to land #2634927
    Arthur
    Participant

    I wonder why nobody says that everytime Belgian or Dutch F-16’s intercept
    a suspected airliners every now and then :rolleyes:

    http://www.f-16.net/f-16_news_article1207.html

    Well, the Dutch don’t divert aircraft to Denmark or Luxemburg. That’s the problem i have with Israel’s actions.

    in reply to: WC-130J tests #2634937
    Arthur
    Participant

    What’s wrong with the P-3 hurricane hunters?

    Those are Navy… the Air Force wants it’s own toys. It seems the USAF is very eager to put all it’s C-130J’s in non-transport roles, by the way.

    in reply to: Isreal Forces Lufthansa Jet to land #2635177
    Arthur
    Participant

    Sadly Arthur, that’s a luxury of space that we just don’t have.

    I think Uvda/Ovda (is Uvda the correct spelling? I always thought it was with an O) is pretty remote, down there in the Negev. I can imagine that i would prefer my own (Israeli) bombsquad snooping through a suspect aircraft than someone else’s (Cypriotic) sappers. When trying to entrance to a suspected ‘threat’ like Israel has done now today, you also deny yourself the possible intelligence. If the Cypriots actually had found something aboard, i’m not so sure if that would have given the same possibly useful anti-terrorist information to Israel as would have happened if Israeli specialists combed the plane.

    Also, as was said before: you shouldn’t overestimate the danger of a crashing airliner, especially not if it’s blown up at a few thousand feet. It has no chance of taking as many lives as were lost on 9/11.

    in reply to: The taking of Diego Garcia #2070226
    Arthur
    Participant

    Hi Arthur

    Can you explain more about this project Mercury in Greenland? Does it have to do with the putting of the first US astronaut in space?

    Officially yes, but actually, no. It was a huge base/city under the ice in central Greenland built around 1960, which was officially to house some space tracking stuff to work with the radar stations built in Greenland at the time (the primary mission of which was of course to provide early warning for incoming Soviet attacks). But in effect it was a huge underground city/base ment to protect at least 50.000 (but probably more) people during a nuclear conflict. The base was dismantled when the ice started moving, although i don’t know when that happened.

    in reply to: Su-34 over other Flankers #2635216
    Arthur
    Participant

    Personally I don’t think there will be a toilet in the eventual production machines. Pilots have been make do with diapers or disposal bags (a urine condom if you will) for a long, long time now. I don’t see why that should suddenly change.

    Besides, if they got the plumbing there already, it’s much cooler to install a jacuzi 😀

    in reply to: Isreal Forces Lufthansa Jet to land #2635220
    Arthur
    Participant

    I believe the bulk of diverted landings in the American (US that is) North East are diverted to Bangor, Maine which is in the US. Reason for that is that it’s a lot easier for US security organisations to check the airplane for whatever might (not) be aboard.

    in reply to: Isreal Forces Lufthansa Jet to land #2635330
    Arthur
    Participant

    **Edited by google: We can argue about this in PMs. 🙂

    Mind you, Sens has given valid reasons why Erez’ fears are unfounded. Hence the word paranoia is in place.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,941 through 2,955 (of 6,424 total)