dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,781 through 3,795 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Your favourite Monty Python Sketch/Song #1993787
    Arthur
    Participant

    Depending on my company, either I like traffic lights or Sit on my face.

    in reply to: Do-24ATT on World Tour #1585360
    Arthur
    Participant

    So the Do-24ATT is actually the previous Dornier SeaStar? That one has visited a lot of airshows around 1990, if my memory isn’t failing me.

    in reply to: Quiz for Squirt fans #1585362
    Arthur
    Participant

    It’s not the prototype which now is at the Aviodrome, as that has a red/silver paintjob. Dayglo and black anti-glare was on the operational aircraft, so L-11 at the Militair Luchtvaart Museum at Kamp Zeist/Soesterberg. ‘Vreeburghal’ is the name of the hangar (= hal, as in ‘hall’) in which it’s preserved. Named after engineer Vreeburg 😉

    Arthur
    Participant

    If you don’t mind spending twice as much time on keeping up with the administration rather than the ‘real’ work…

    in reply to: C'mon – own up – who knew?!?! #2695232
    Arthur
    Participant

    So a Merc article then? Cool!

    in reply to: A Quick Sat. Nite Quiz, Pt. II #1585705
    Arthur
    Participant

    You’re welcome PL – and no, i am not. Just good with Google and i have my references neatly piled up next to my computer 🙂

    Stephen, i don’t know if you are of any influence to the site i mentioned above, but it mentions
    “…Again, this Lim 5 (Polish designation for the MiG 17F) was the last MiG 17 to fly for the entire Eastern Bloc…”
    which is not true. Albania nominally still operates the MiG-17 in Chinese-built J-5 form, and these have flown after Poland’s definite MiG-17 retirement. It’s also not impossible that a few M-17s (unmanned target drones, rebuilt from retired MiG-17s) lingered on at the Russian test centre at Akhtubinsk.

    in reply to: Su-34 #2695441
    Arthur
    Participant

    😀

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum Questions #2695445
    Arthur
    Participant

    Well, they have got covers over the cockpit and intakes and such… I assume they are kept in some sort of operational status, otherwise i’m sure they would have been parked somewhere in a not-quite-so-organised manner. It’s hard to tell how well they were really looked after, but it being Russian i can honestly say that i have seen aircraft fly which looked worse than those stored MiG-29s. A number of them were already 9.13s, interestingly enough.

    On the other hand, the MiG-29s are parked on the same disused runway as some 300 MiG-23s. If the fading of their paintwork is anything to judge their status on…

    in reply to: A Quick Sat. Nite Quiz, Pt. II #1585779
    Arthur
    Participant

    Lim-5 1717 is now on the US civil register as N1717M, and is owned by… oh, wait: Stephen Patterson 😀
    http://kcghostsquadron.airbase1.com/CAF-Plane-MIG17.htm

    The Lim-5 (both 1717 and 1728 are of that breed) is a Polish licence-built MiG-17F, all built by PZL-Mielec. The Poles built a total of 477 Lim-5s from 1956 to 1960. Some of which were of the short-lived Lim-5M variety with the ugly thick inner wing for extra fuel (all later converted to either standard-Lim-5 or Lim-6bis), or of the Lim-5R recce variety with a camera in the fuselage. There also was the Lim-5P which was a licensed version of the radar-equipped MiG-17PF. Poland built 129 of these as interceptors. When they became obsolete in the air-to-air role, they were rebuilt as attack aircraft and were renamed Lim-6M.

    After the Lim-5, the Lim-6 with a brake chute and other modification entered production. It initially also had the thick inner wing, but these were rejected and all were rebuilt with normal wings as Lim-6bis. Apart from the numerous Lim-5M and Lim-6 conversions, seventy new-built Lim-6bis left the factory until 1964.

    MiG-17s of any kind (mostly of Polish and Chinese production though) have been entering the US at a steady pace ever since the late 1980s. In 1988, a company with the friendly title of Combat Core Certification Professionals (yes, CCCP 🙂 ) imported a bunch of Lim-5 and -6Ms in 1988 for the Defense Test and Support Evaluation Agency, together with a few old MiG-21s from both Poland and Hungary. These aircraft were all airworthy and took part during one exercise from Kirtland AFB, NM after which they were sold on the warbird market.

    Because Poland was retiring it’s last Lims from the 1980s on (in 1991 three operational units still operated the type at Babimost, Bydgoscsz and Cewice-Semierowice) and these were all in a pretty good state, a lot of those later also found their way to the US. I reckon there should be more than 50 Lims in the US by now. I don’t know how many actually ended up flying, i tend to lose track of aircraft as soon as they end being military.

    in reply to: 170,000 British Women can't be wrong #1993863
    Arthur
    Participant

    170.000 ugly women?

    in reply to: Su-34 #2695470
    Arthur
    Participant

    Aren’t we confusing the sort of Tu-22 to be replaced by the Su-34? The Flatface-Flanker doesn’t have the range nor payload to take the role of the Backfire, but it’s actually pretty comparable with the Blinder. Of course the latter has been retired for some time now, but with recce and EW suits fitted i think the Su-34 will make a lighter and cheaper replacement for the Blinder than the Tu-22M ever will. Especially since the only remaining variant of the Backfire in service is the Tu-22M3, which has capabilities far exceeding those of the Blinder.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum Questions #2695472
    Arthur
    Participant

    Don’t think there are naval MiG-29s anymore. Back in the Soviet Union days there was a IIRC regiment of them in the Ukraine, but that no longer exists.

    The Scramble OrBat at http://www.scramble.nl/ru.htm gives only some 7 operational regiments, and a number of MiG-29 operating training- and test units. Combined they don’t make for more than some 400 operational MiG-29s. Which makes sense, since there are at least some 100 Fulcrums in storage at Lipetsk.

    in reply to: What's the purpose of the horizontal dielectric bands? #2695477
    Arthur
    Participant

    Don’t know what you mean. Perhaps you can illustrate it with a picture?

    Arthur
    Participant

    It’s a freelance job, you get paid per article. Word count, your own contract, that kind of work.

    I don’t know about the details with Jane’s, but expect a lot of haggling…

    in reply to: No more Mr. niceguy in Iraq #1993922
    Arthur
    Participant

    I don’t know if you noticed, but i’ve only been trying to be silly. You haven’t seen me in an insulting mood, and so far you haven’t given me a reason for that anyway.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,781 through 3,795 (of 6,424 total)