dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,966 through 4,980 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #423976
    Arthur
    Participant

    Russians used to have canned vodka (straight, not the girlie stuff) when some brilliant tax law put state revenue on bottles of liquor… I had the stuff once (with the two Natasha’s actually), but unfortunately that was on purpose. I would have liked it really more if i would have been driving around, feeling really thirsty and decided to buy a canned softdrink for behind the wheel πŸ˜€

    Come and think of it, it’s a miracle this didn’t happen. It’s definately the Arthur-way.

    in reply to: Pic of yourself? #1991535
    Arthur
    Participant

    Russians used to have canned vodka (straight, not the girlie stuff) when some brilliant tax law put state revenue on bottles of liquor… I had the stuff once (with the two Natasha’s actually), but unfortunately that was on purpose. I would have liked it really more if i would have been driving around, feeling really thirsty and decided to buy a canned softdrink for behind the wheel πŸ˜€

    Come and think of it, it’s a miracle this didn’t happen. It’s definately the Arthur-way.

    in reply to: General Discussion #423985
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by SOC
    Nah, we didn’t have it over there, sorry πŸ˜€

    If we did, you would have known because India would probably have bought it as an interim-solution pending the purchase of their interim-aircraft carrier pending their homebuilt carriers.

    in reply to: Anyone want to buy this? lol #1991543
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by SOC
    Nah, we didn’t have it over there, sorry πŸ˜€

    If we did, you would have known because India would probably have bought it as an interim-solution pending the purchase of their interim-aircraft carrier pending their homebuilt carriers.

    in reply to: General Discussion #423991
    Arthur
    Participant

    You could at least have photoshopped those softdrinks into beer cans πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Pic of yourself? #1991548
    Arthur
    Participant

    You could at least have photoshopped those softdrinks into beer cans πŸ˜€

    in reply to: General Discussion #423997
    Arthur
    Participant

    I think he wrote a book.

    in reply to: Hey where's Mr. Hamburger? #1991552
    Arthur
    Participant

    I think he wrote a book.

    in reply to: ¡iPIC¡jNew Chinese J10B(twin seats) #2677396
    Arthur
    Participant

    I’ve seen the prototype being called a JJ-1 (it’s in Datang Shan), and it’s referred to as such in the compulsory China Today: Aviation Industry book. Shameless plug not benefitting me: if you can find the book, buy it. It should still be pretty easily available, i bought mine in a publishing-surplus sale in 1998 for some (converted) 8 Euros (that’s 10US$ today).

    And i’ll get to Andreas – i love his work (especially on US designations), but haven’t taken time to browse through his whole site yet.

    in reply to: ¡iPIC¡jNew Chinese J10B(twin seats) #2677417
    Arthur
    Participant

    Allow me for some nitpicking…

    CJ-3, CJ-5, CJ-6: Yak-18
    There is no CJ-3, the CJ-6 is actually more like the Yak-52 than as the Yak-18.
    J-2: MiG-15
    J-4, J-5: MiG-17

    The MiG-15 was never built in China, the MiG-17 was built only as J-5.
    Y-10: 707
    The Y-10 is actually a whole lot smaller than the 707. More like a CV880.
    Y-14: An-26
    Designation was dropped, should be Y-7H.
    Z-5, Z-6: Mi-4
    The Z-6, while being based somewhat on the Mi-4, was a completely different helicopter looking more like a Mi-8 (albeit an extremely ugly one) than anything else.

    Funny is that none of China’s indigenous designs ever reached real production, one can argue that the J-8II was the first one. But the JJ-1 (jet trainer looking like a T-33-mates-Fouga), Beijing-1 (that’s the small twin-prop transport, looks like the DH Dove made love to the Il-12) and Y-10 never reached production. Of course Soviet licenses and non-licensed production was a lot cheaper and various brilliant policies during the Mao days did all they could to ruin the country, but it can’t be said that all aviation knowledge in India was imported. Unlike some other countries i can think of, including Israel (the Arava and Lavi were designed almost completely by Americans, the Westwind is a Rockwell design, the Nesher was obviously French while it were American engineers modifying it into the Kfir).

    As for the drawing: duh. A little photoshop, a little drawing yourself, and a lot of quality reduction in the original and suddenly you find that some of the more gullible people think you’re Mike Badrocke!

    in reply to: Best aviation site ever! #2677910
    Arthur
    Participant

    Then i guess you’re right about it being some kind of thermal indication. Stuff like that is always very much dependent on the context, and often enough (especially if it’s in a fictional setting) it is not really worth thinking about any ‘true’ meaning. Just cool-sounding jibberish which is sometimes used to bring some life into a piece of language. Just like in Arab, a “Western Agressor” is a lot less fun than a “Western Imperialist Zionist Agressor-Dog”

    Spice up your language, i’d say!

    in reply to: Best aviation site ever! #2677931
    Arthur
    Participant

    In what sense would that be?

    in reply to: Antonov An-22 'Antei' #2677935
    Arthur
    Participant

    So you want to be able to hide your **** in the bushes, eh?

    I should have an old (1995 or so) issue of Vestnik Vozduchnaya Flota with some pics of the camouflaged An-22 somewhere, but i won’t be able to find that on short notice…

    In the mean time, here is what i could find on the net:

    Two top views, from both sides:
    http://www.milparade.com/ra/sam202.jpg
    http://legion.wplus.net/guide/air/t/an22-2.jpg

    Possibly interesting for the camo/off-white demarcation under the nose:
    http://www.milparade.com/ra/sam203.jpg

    Will look around further, it looks far too nice and i’m still frustrated i never saw it.

    in reply to: Best aviation site ever! #2677963
    Arthur
    Participant

    …heΒ΄s right, you mean πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: General Discussion #425388
    Arthur
    Participant

    I’ve taken his!

    Bhuwahahahaaa!

Viewing 15 posts - 4,966 through 4,980 (of 6,424 total)