dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,996 through 5,010 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2679789
    Arthur
    Participant

    An absolute logistical nightmare.
    It’s something you might consider as a CIWS (for ships obviously, but i wouldn’t discard it’s use for defending targets like airbases or similar either), but apart from that i don’t see much use for it. It really is a one-(10.000 shot)-round weapon, and when that shot has been fired you need a whole bunch of replenishment (paper-)work to get ready for another shot.

    Also, the amount of firepower delivered is dependent on the number of barrels you have available. Somehow, i don’t see combat jets in the near future with four square feet of their frontal area reserved for MetalStorm close-in weapons.

    However, i do think a system like this could have a future as some sort of small-area air defense. A bunch of radar-guided batteries of Metal Storm could be pretty effective in breaking up bunker-busting bombs before they hit their targets.

    Oh, and i’m sure the weaponry-nutbag-idiots will have a lot of fun with metal storm during their shooting weekends. Events which i will happily denounce as idiotic events for pathetic losers unless i’m invited for one of them 😀

    in reply to: 210 more Super bugs for the USN #2679793
    Arthur
    Participant

    But Vort, when buying stocks in a plan economy you only need to make sure you know when to sell. Either just before the results of the previoud 5-year-plan are presented, or just after the new 5-year-goals are announced…

    In all honesty, this is actually ment a little less sarcastic as it seems 🙂

    Sean,
    I know the Wichita plant was built as a state factory and hence could be considered as a GAZ, but it could well be sold/handed over to a private company over the years. I know it’s a terribly nerdish question, but for an idiot like me it’s interesting to know who is the actual owner of the infrastructure (production hangars, tarmac, stuff like that) at Wichita. It was definately built as a GAZ to counter all the evil menaces, but i don’t know who owns the plant today. I expect it to be Boeing, but i wouldn’t be surprised if it was Cessna or the US Gvt.

    in reply to: new Tiger meet photos #2679798
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by Franck66
    No i’m not a professional, just a passion with aviation 😉

    I use Canon D60 with 100-400 lense

    With such a relatively short lense, you definately know to pick your spot to take pictures from.

    And even if you didn’t, you are still a very gifted photographer. It only happens very rarely that i download a pic to my PC just because it’s a pretty picture, but it has happened more than once with the pics you took… There are self-acclaimed professional photographers which don’t reach your standards by far. I’m serious (having seen quite a few pictures over the years).

    Keep up the good work, and publish a calendar for 2005. I’ll buy one for sure.

    in reply to: Best method of air-to-air refueling #2679801
    Arthur
    Participant

    Israel, Iran and the Netherlands also have boom-tankers, but that has more to do with being compatible with US-supplied gear than anything else.

    The reason why boom-refuelling has become the way to go with the USAF (and hence with all apostle-air forces also taking up boom refuelling) is that this way of refuelling allows for the largest quantity of fuel transferred through the shortest amount of time. Don’t forget, boom refuelling was initially ment to refuel bombers like the B-47 and B-52 on their 24/7 alert patrols around the USSR. Back in the early days, USAF tactical fighters like the F-100 and F-104 used the good old hose&drogue refuelling system. Only because the SAC with it’s B-47s and B-52s wasn’t just the main recepient but also the main operator of KC-95 and -135, the boom refuelling method became the main way of refuelling within the USAF.

    For strategical operations, one single large bomber sucking fuel out of a tanker airplane via boom refuelling makes perfect sense. But tactically, it’s a lot more efficient to refuel three tactical aircraft out of one tanker via hose and drogue refuelling. But since it was SAC which called the shots in the 1950s and early 1960s USAF, we’re stuck with boom refuelling these days.

    Which is fine with me, because it has given us nitwit enthusiasts some awesome aerial photography.

    in reply to: General Discussion #426456
    Arthur
    Participant

    His car should be lifted by an ice-skating henchperson, but instead he uses his poor driving skills to twirl.

    in reply to: New comers plea #1993019
    Arthur
    Participant

    His car should be lifted by an ice-skating henchperson, but instead he uses his poor driving skills to twirl.

    in reply to: General Discussion #426463
    Arthur
    Participant

    As long as your feet are smelly enough, it can still be called a dish.

    in reply to: Beagle 2 stuck in a crater? #1993025
    Arthur
    Participant

    As long as your feet are smelly enough, it can still be called a dish.

    in reply to: General Discussion #426471
    Arthur
    Participant

    No, they are fried first.

    So after wearing them a few weeks, it’ll be more like Chicken Kiev.

    in reply to: Beagle 2 stuck in a crater? #1993030
    Arthur
    Participant

    No, they are fried first.

    So after wearing them a few weeks, it’ll be more like Chicken Kiev.

    in reply to: General Discussion #426479
    Arthur
    Participant

    No, Nicky also does mid-air twirling. But he’s a cheat, he isn’t lifted by some scantily clad twirling-henchman.

    in reply to: New comers plea #1993038
    Arthur
    Participant

    No, Nicky also does mid-air twirling. But he’s a cheat, he isn’t lifted by some scantily clad twirling-henchman.

    in reply to: General Discussion #426500
    Arthur
    Participant

    Eddie Hitler, you know. That guy from Bottom.

    in reply to: The missing dictator! #1993051
    Arthur
    Participant

    Eddie Hitler, you know. That guy from Bottom.

    in reply to: 210 more Super bugs for the USN #2680317
    Arthur
    Participant

    I’m not sure if the Aviazavod in St. Louis is a state-owned GAZ or not. Marietta and Burbank are real GAZ (Gosudarstvenni AviaZavod, State Aircraft Plant), and perhaps you could run across the runway to check a certain former bomber factory 😉 ?

Viewing 15 posts - 4,996 through 5,010 (of 6,424 total)