dark light

richw_82

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,736 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #889679
    richw_82
    Participant

    I was going to post a huge bunch of photos, but there’s not as many good shots as I had hoped due to all of us working.

    One of our team, Barry Wheeler, had a camera set up though and got some good video footage.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rH9MkLZP6xw

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #890470
    richw_82
    Participant

    Yes, its all good to go!

    It was a hell of a lot of hard work. We were on site for around 11 hours and some of the team had travelled from quite a way out and didn’t get home until gone midnight… but it was the only way we could be sure that WR963 would be properly ready, rather than trying to deal with a braking system that was past its best. It was a near run thing though, as the big aircraft jacks only arrived on site at midday.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #890506
    richw_82
    Participant

    More detailed update (plus photos and video) to come… but on Saturday we managed to get the aircraft jacked, the mainwheels removed, and all four brake sets stripped and rebuilt. The wheels were back on and the aircraft back on the ground late that evening, with the test of the system showing we have 100% brakes with no audible leaks.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #895093
    richw_82
    Participant

    A little update ahead of this coming Saturday’s work.

    On the last run up we thought we’d solved our brake issues. After starting to sort out various pneumatic leaks, we were confident we’d got to the point where the brakes will hold, and we were right. However, the pressure loss was still a problem. After a good run up, the brakes were holding but only sustaining pressure while the inboard engines were running at quite high rpm, and attempts at using the parking brake bled off pressure in minutes.

    After wasting most of the day chasing tiny leaks in the charging side and storage side of the system we finally got WR963 holding decent park brake pressures for a good while, but the brake expander bags were still going down one after the other as the pressure increased. They are the ones the aircraft flew in on and in age terms they’ve been on far longer than is proper.

    We can taxy, but with no guarantee it will be reliable. This means our only option is to get some brake changes done!

    So, we raided our stock of new old stock expander bags.

    https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpt1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/11866501_10206243535241303_4341817095494498183_n.jpg?oh=cd1301379ac1034ffad8d9a0f420411f&oe=566A99BE

    Then we borrowed a suitable jack and tried a test lift. The problem we have is that jacks of a suitable height and weight are few and far between at the airport. This one was suitable, but will be replaced at some point as we’re still waiting for some refurbished ones we have on order to be delivered to site.

    https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/11903926_10206243539161401_5871645582945452130_n.jpg?oh=45d65fbc076c4a3e3950691f44fb6c6f&oe=5635A73E

    And success… up she goes.

    https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/11000575_10206243536201327_4685594249101988842_n.jpg?oh=31c85c911be6f964895b5e465cdf8450&oe=567B2A7F

    Next Saturday will see both wheels off, brake bags replaced, both wheels back on, then a pressure test. Then we’re not only ready to taxy, we should be good to do so repeatedly and reliably.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Shackleton WL795 #896265
    richw_82
    Participant

    Rich & the SPT crew are being kept informed of what’s going on, not much on 795 would be of much use to them as the Cornish weather has not been that kind, but they are of great help & I hope & pray that they will continue to be!

    Even when we were in the running for the tender, it was never for parts. There’s too few Shackletons left to lose any more; we can’t save them all but we can certainly try and support the teams that try.

    We’re helping where we can, and a chance find last week of a bunch of Dowty undercarriage drawings may provide a long term landing gear solution for the last Shack on duty in Cornwall. The guys at St Mawgan are doing a cracking job in the face of a lot of adversity from the corrosion on the aircraft itself, to logistics, and a ton of other things. We’re not going to abandon them, or WL795.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Classic Air Force #907381
    richw_82
    Participant

    Presumably there will be serious implications for the Shack and Nimrod?

    Shackleton, slight implications if anything, Nimrod more serious. This isn’t new territory as the initial Newquay move was everything was going southwest, and we planned accordingly.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Shackleton MR3 AP request #908057
    richw_82
    Participant

    Thanks Peter. 🙂

    I’ve been watching the fantastic progress at Gatwick through the photo’s on the Facebook page. Its inspiring stuff, and the revamped museum is going to be the envy of a few organisations I’m sure.

    Kind regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Shackleton MR3 AP request #908550
    richw_82
    Participant

    Howard, Peter, thank you both.

    Peter, if you already have the manuals scanned and could send me a copy that would be great. You’re right about the cost of AP’s from the RAF Museum, we had a radio AP copied last year and the cost was eye watering.

    Howard, if Peter already has the manuals scanned I think I’ll take him up on the offer; though thanks for the offer of copies from NAM – I appreciate the amount of time it would have taken to do that.

    Thanks again,

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Shackleton today :) #912085
    richw_82
    Participant

    They’re on the list, but those do fine for the moment!

    in reply to: Mystery Lancaster over Derbyshire? #915832
    richw_82
    Participant

    Photos? Cameras are the devils work, a picture of you steals your soul…

    (Rich in Derbyshire yokel mode. 😛 )

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #915849
    richw_82
    Participant

    Good point. I’ll get back to you on that.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #916249
    richw_82
    Participant

    VTTS or CAF, yes.

    in reply to: Mystery Lancaster over Derbyshire? #916256
    richw_82
    Participant

    Misidentification. Its never a C130, its always a Lanc and therefore a ghost.

    in reply to: Shackleton variants #916407
    richw_82
    Participant

    Trenchardbrat – I don’t suppose you have anything relating to our WR963 when she was out there (which was about the same time as WL798)?

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #916437
    richw_82
    Participant

    Subject to serviceability WR963 will be going for a taxy around –

    http://www.farewelltothesky.com/the-day

    If she behaves, there’ll be a few more over the coming months.

    Regards,

    Rich

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 1,736 total)