dark light

richw_82

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 1,736 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #997758
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi all,

    Due to personal circumstances I’ve not been to Coventry for a few weeks. However the guys have been cracking on, and also doing a few bits on Nimrod XV232 for good measure. Also there’s the odd interesting photo turned up from the archives… this one in particular being a favourite.

    https://scontent-a-lhr.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/q79/s720x720/1395413_631374760242617_1204755750_n.jpg

    in reply to: AEW Aircaft Manufactuers Construction Numbers #1004006
    richw_82
    Participant

    Just like that. Thanks Dr S!

    in reply to: AEW Aircaft Manufactuers Construction Numbers #1005232
    richw_82
    Participant

    They didn’t have construction numbers. Those serials listed have been kicking around on various photo sites and have been read off a data plate on a sub assembly somewhere, probably the tail fins.

    The only serial numbers they have as such are the military ones. I had to dig into the subject in order to get WR963 registered with the CAA as they initially wouldn’t accept the military serial was also Avro’s construction number for the aircraft.

    Regards,
    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #934099
    richw_82
    Participant

    As far as I’m aware the tanks are venting okay.

    The cap arrangement is such that there’s a panel to open in the wing, below which is a recess in which sits the tank cap itself, which has a screw down top. We had one instance where the recess was filling up and overcoming the tank cap seal; until we cleared the drainpipe to allow collected water to drain away.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #934156
    richw_82
    Participant

    Its not condensation, we tried moving her around to see if the other side getting the sun would produce a similar result. It didn’t. We still had the water showing in the same place on the port side.

    As soon as we tape over the tank caps, the water doesn’t show (it didn’t show during the three weeks indoors either..) We think its getting in through one of the caps and collecting in the lowest point of the system – which is the fuel primng.

    Regards,
    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #934181
    richw_82
    Participant

    Well, a grumpy Shackleton resulted in two engines at first, then after some fettling we got all four singing in unison a little later in the day. 🙂

    WR963 this weekend, from the Birmingham Aviation Enthusiasts Group’s website (http://baeg.blogspot.co.uk/).

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-nUBHUlD2rrc/UkhuGwReXMI/AAAAAAAAsnM/ipPbyBoQj-Q/s1600/RK-WR963+CVT+28.09.13+2gbaeg.jpg

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #939881
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi all,

    As CameronSys posted, its that time again. This will be the first engine run of WR963 since the taxy attempt in early August – due to her having a brief rest indoors while the mainwheels were changed. She’s back at the side of Nimrod XV232 in her usual place.

    Kind regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Long Marston collection #941238
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi Geoff,

    No idea, we were only ever allowed to take a couple of minor bits. We asked repeatedly whether there would be a chance she would be sold to us for spares and never got a decision. I guess the new owner put up more cash than we did… and I hope he knows exactly what he’s bought, otherwise this could be a re-run of the Blackpool Vulcan story.

    in reply to: Long Marston collection #943059
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi All,
    I always wondered why the team of WR693 never targeted the Long Marston Shackleton for spares, but I am just glad that someone has seen fit to end it’s days of misery as she has been sitting in the current location for years slowly dilapidating and begging for a proper restoration as have all the other airframes good luck fella. :eagerness:

    Geoff.

    We did several times, but the people involved at Long Marston always promised to get back to us and never did. No doubt whoever has purchased it will become known before long if he/she wants to acquire replacements for the bits that are missing.

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton Blue Prints #963988
    richw_82
    Participant

    I think we may have already crossed paths on eBay!

    Regards,
    Rich W

    in reply to: :eek: Cull at Gatwick Museum! #974504
    richw_82
    Participant

    .. or Coventry! 😉

    Yeah. Without using the towbar and tractor next time..

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #976605
    richw_82
    Participant

    Some pictures taken during the main wheel change.

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/q73/s720x720/543393_602184123161681_1745601002_n.jpg

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/q72/s720x720/1151031_602184099828350_1898439441_n.jpg

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/q77/s720x720/1001729_602184116495015_1086467213_n.jpg

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/q72/s720x720/1176178_602184196495007_163589795_n.jpg

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/q71/s720x720/1175525_602184276494999_1867839639_n.jpg

    https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/q80/s720x720/1003359_602184319828328_1114524576_n.jpg

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton WR963 Project Thread #977253
    richw_82
    Participant

    Hi all,

    After our attempt at taxying failed, we were left with a bit of time on our hands. Fortunate really as we have to sort out the issues that plagued WR963 and we can get a bit more done besides.

    There’s an intermittant fault on the PTR175 V/UHF which sometimes stops transmitting, and the PTR1751 V/UHF still needs attention to allow us to use the correct frequencies. We have a couple of guys that know radios looking them over as most of it seems to be an antenna issue.

    The pneumatic syatem still has a few audible leaks, so the system is being tested at every joint to get it as leak free as possible. We know pressure will inevitably bleed away, as there are constant feeds to other systems than brakes – but it would be a good thing if the compressors on the inboard engines only had to keep up with a normal demand rather than struggling with leaks too.

    The fuel priming pumps, as often seen in this thread are a long standing pain in the rear, but thankfully are relatively easy to swap out. The water ingress into these is only on the port side, and we thought we’d stopped it. It turns out we were wrong, so we’re working back from the fuel manifold to find out which tank is letting it all in.

    Saturday saw us ready to fit two new mainwheels as we did have our doubts about the ones she has been standing on for the last 20 years. Thanks again to our long time friends at Air Atlantique, through their generosity WR963 got to enjoy a brief spell in the hangar at Coventry – something we’d like to see happpen more often once our funding level rises sufficiently.

    By Friday afternoon WR963 was sat snug in Hangar 7 at Coventry Airport. When I say snug I mean it… as you don’t realise what a big girl she is until you try and fit her where DC3’s normally sit. I think there’s about 18″ clearance off each wingtip! Two large 50,000lb capacity jacks were loaned, and at 1030hrs Saturday morning the Shackletons mainwheels were off the ground… albeit using hydraulic effort rather than Rolls Royce’s. It looked a bit odd to see a big aircraft sat there on jacks with no wheel on. The work went well, with the two brand new mainwheels fitted and the brakes given a good checking and fettling too and WR963 was gently lowered back down after around four hours work.

    On the administrative side; to get things progressing towards airworthy we need a company with CAA A8-20 E4 approval to support us. They will be the ones who would submit various reports to the CAA on our behalf covering design, safety record and numerous other things such as the all important the Permit to Fly application. We approached two companies – one could not carry out the work due to no longer carrying the approval. The other is considering the matter. We have our fingers crossed.

    Photo’s of the mainwheel swap to come a little later.

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Fairey Barracuda DP872 #980857
    richw_82
    Participant

    I notice the diary entry says there’s not much of a right wing to work with – maybe a revisit to PM870 is due? There seems to be quite a bit of wing structure left on site.

    http://www.peakdistrictaircrashes.co.uk/pages/scotland/scotlandpm870.htm

    Regards,

    Rich

    in reply to: Avro Vulcan factory numbers #980861
    richw_82
    Participant

    I asked BAE/Avro Heritage the question about another Avro type and got told military aircraft orders were always referred to by serial number, nothing else.

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 1,736 total)