We’re hoping to have the bottles inspected but the fittings on the end are difficult to remove. One of them has been handed to the local REME mechs where I work.
They have been informed that despite the proven effectiveness of “big ‘ammers” I want the bottle and its attachment back in one piece. Without glue or weld being involved in achieving that.
I have confidence in them.
😀
Rich
Thanks all.
We’ve been down at Coventry working in some really nasty weather the past few weeks, but it is paying off, as you can see. Hopefully in the next few days I’ll have some video for here, though there’s already some rough video and more pictures on the website.
The pre-oilers are working great, and we’re all keeping fit running the props through (four minutes for each engine! 😮 )
before even attempting to start.
Our trolley acc took a battering in the freezing temperatures and the batteries appear to be toast. Even leaving them on charge hasn’t revived them, so Classic Flight kindly lent is a GPU, we couldn’t have run today if it hadn’t been for that kind gesture.
Thanks to all at Classic Flight for that, it was very much appreciated.
No 3 engine was the first to start, and caught on the second attempt. It took a while to come on the throttle and smooth out, but we put that down to the fact everything has been taken off it, moved or disconnected in the last 12 months. When it did smooth out, it ran great. No 4 behaved as if it hadn’t missed more than a couple of days since it last ran.
Both engines were run up individually, the temps and pressures all as they should be. Bomb doors and flaps all got a work out though we haven’t got pneumatics online yet as we’re still having issues with the air bottles. If the dates are to be believed we can’t use them until the’re inspected. The date on at least one bottle says “Next Insp 7.61 ” :eek::eek:
I just can’t get my head around how well behaved 963 was today though. We even had little things like the windscreen wipers working. The only issues we encountered was a problem with the external intercom, the navigation lights wouldn’t work, and one landing lamp was sticking down.
I’ve never seen so many happy faces from our little group. They can see 963 coming back to life, and in the next few weeks you’re all going to see the pace pick up further. Hopefully next time we’ll be able to show you three running, and four shortly after that.
When we get four Roger, you’ll hear her no matter which way the wind’s blowing!
Regards,
Rich

2 done, 2 to go.
😀
Gents,
Just a quick note to let you all know, WR963 successfully awoke earlier today. She lives!!
We ran no 3 and 4, with no problems there. Only a couple of minor electrical system snags.
More to come later from me after a rest and a brew.
😉
Regards
Rich
The Firefly is being built from an old freebie plan from “Radio Control Scale Aircraft” magazine from Aug 1995. It’s a Mk V, and it comes in at 40 inch wingspan, so its more or less 1/12 scale. I like the Mk V, but the yellow ex-Swedish example at Duxford really has got to me.
I hate foam wings, but I’m not worried about building a traditional built up wing for it. I know how the flaps deploy, but I’m not sure how I’d make them work in something that small!
The Shackleton will end up down at Coventry, though I don’t know what it will be used with. I couldn’t bring myself to break it up when I realised it was too heavy. 😮
Okay, Christmas is over (which is more than can be said for the turkey!) and we’re all back to our workshops… so what’s in building?
We’re looking forward to seeing a larger (and less porky) Shackleton from AN2grahame… what else is coming on?
Just noticed this!
The overweight Shackleton is going to be completd as a display model, so that’s been put on one side. I’m raiding the drawing archive we have at Coventry for the Shackleton, and I’ve been looking at the Philip Noel Designs MR3, ready to have a crack at another.
I’ve started building a Fairey Firefly and I’m having ideas about making the wings fold for easy storage. I’m unsure whether to do it as the old RNHF aircraft or a bright yellow Swedish variant.
Other stuff involves repairing a couple of puncture wounds in my Beaufighter after a slight unintentional aircraft/ground interface!
Regards,
Rich
Time for a new car mate!
That was the new one… 🙁
Time for a new car mate!
That was the new one… 🙁
Imagining the look on Richw_82’s face on recieving the gift I sent him earlier to assist his efforts with the Shackleton! :diablo::D
I’ll get you back for that. :dev2:
Honestly… what the hell am I supposed to achieve with ONE rivet? Send the rest of ’em you tight git!
Cheers for the Lindy patch though its superb.
Rich
Imagining the look on Richw_82’s face on recieving the gift I sent him earlier to assist his efforts with the Shackleton! :diablo::D
I’ll get you back for that. :dev2:
Honestly… what the hell am I supposed to achieve with ONE rivet? Send the rest of ’em you tight git!
Cheers for the Lindy patch though its superb.
Rich
To all those travelling North on the A1, around 1pm today between Peterborough and Stamford. That funny oily haze was created by a rather poorly Jaguar, with its driver desperately trying to get it to the next exit.
He was swearing rather profusely.
He’s only just got home. And only just stopped swearing.
:(:(
To all those travelling North on the A1, around 1pm today between Peterborough and Stamford. That funny oily haze was created by a rather poorly Jaguar, with its driver desperately trying to get it to the next exit.
He was swearing rather profusely.
He’s only just got home. And only just stopped swearing.
:(:(
No problem. 😉
No problem. 😉
Just a thought…
Would we really need to build from fresh? Think about it… what is the current number of type of ground running/airworthy historics and how would that stack up into something useable?
We have Victors, Vulcans, Shackletons, Buccaneers, Lightnings…
It would be quite a formdable force I reckon 😮
Rich