dark light

sealordlawrence

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 5,730 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sharia Law in the UK #1916949
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    I see sealord is back to hes usual islam bashing. Just to clarify the archbishop has mentioned about using some Shariah law in courts not any muslim body so before everyone go’s out and starts to lynch muslims do read that part again.

    On a more serious note, religious courts do exist in the UK and have such as the jewish beth din. If hes refering to something like this well it kind of allready exists. I dont support implementing any shariah within UK law, this country is majority non-muslim so it makes no sence as i think it may isolate minority groups more. Hes speech seems more politically motivated, maybe hes trying to draw more masses to the church. Might actually work.

    With the amount of islamaphobia going around these days im not suprised with the reaction though.

    No ‘islamophobia’ at all, just serious concerns about human rights.

    The introduction of Islamic law into UK law is even more worrying than the establishment of a parallel system. Fortunately the overwhelming response to this seems to have quite rightly been absolute disgust.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351741
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Except when it comes to whaling, right? 😉

    …oh Christ…forget I said that! 😀

    In that case the present justifies the present……………the past just helps.;)

    in reply to: Sharia Law in the UK #1916960
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Except when it comes to whaling, right? 😉

    …oh Christ…forget I said that! 😀

    In that case the present justifies the present……………the past just helps.;)

    in reply to: General Discussion #351750
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Where, pray tell me (to God, Allah, insert Deity as appropriate) have I suggested that? I don’t think I have because it’s not a view I espouse.

    I’m just pointing out that Christianity took the early moral high ground, and did it spectacularly ruthlessly, in the name of God. Islam has evolved to the point where the Religion and its followers are now on their own form of Crusade. We see radicalisation and Islamisation everywhere. Is Islam now going through the process of evolution that Christianity spent the last 600 years going through? Both Islam and Christianity preach tolerance, love, compassion, consideration for one’s fellow man. Neither Religion has a proud track record in living up to its own teachings.

    Regards,

    kev35

    Certainly a fair point. However that does not make Sharia law right.;)

    in reply to: Sharia Law in the UK #1916968
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Where, pray tell me (to God, Allah, insert Deity as appropriate) have I suggested that? I don’t think I have because it’s not a view I espouse.

    I’m just pointing out that Christianity took the early moral high ground, and did it spectacularly ruthlessly, in the name of God. Islam has evolved to the point where the Religion and its followers are now on their own form of Crusade. We see radicalisation and Islamisation everywhere. Is Islam now going through the process of evolution that Christianity spent the last 600 years going through? Both Islam and Christianity preach tolerance, love, compassion, consideration for one’s fellow man. Neither Religion has a proud track record in living up to its own teachings.

    Regards,

    kev35

    Certainly a fair point. However that does not make Sharia law right.;)

    in reply to: General Discussion #351754
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    SLLawrence
    …..Continue the tone of insult…….

    What???
    Agin the presidency of the USA!!!!

    Go to bed. Tomorrow is a new day. Pick an argument with somebody else.

    ———————————————————————————————————
    Do you not know that I live by arguing, and that admitting my being wrong would be my undoing? – Sir SL Lawrence.

    Your new signature line proves my point.

    in reply to: Sharia Law in the UK #1916972
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    SLLawrence
    …..Continue the tone of insult…….

    What???
    Agin the presidency of the USA!!!!

    Go to bed. Tomorrow is a new day. Pick an argument with somebody else.

    ———————————————————————————————————
    Do you not know that I live by arguing, and that admitting my being wrong would be my undoing? – Sir SL Lawrence.

    Your new signature line proves my point.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351840
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Post 34.
    If that is offensive, then I’m the next president of the USA. Which actually would be offensive, mainly because I can read and write, don’t take bribes, have scruples and morals, have earned my money etc.

    As I said. Stress levels like that make you ill.

    I see that you have taken the decision to continue your offensive tone then.

    in reply to: Sharia Law in the UK #1916990
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    Post 34.
    If that is offensive, then I’m the next president of the USA. Which actually would be offensive, mainly because I can read and write, don’t take bribes, have scruples and morals, have earned my money etc.

    As I said. Stress levels like that make you ill.

    I see that you have taken the decision to continue your offensive tone then.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351845
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    As usual you choose to miss the point.

    I am merely suggesting that as it took Christianity the best part of 600 years to realise that their previous conduct was, shall we say, unacceptable, why would you expect Islam to learn the lesson any quicker?

    Regards,

    kev35

    No you missed the point. Why should we take Christianity as the best case scenario?

    To suggest that we should allow men to be executed for reading literature relating to womans rights becouse Islam needs time to evolve is sickening.

    in reply to: Sharia Law in the UK #1916994
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    As usual you choose to miss the point.

    I am merely suggesting that as it took Christianity the best part of 600 years to realise that their previous conduct was, shall we say, unacceptable, why would you expect Islam to learn the lesson any quicker?

    Regards,

    kev35

    No you missed the point. Why should we take Christianity as the best case scenario?

    To suggest that we should allow men to be executed for reading literature relating to womans rights becouse Islam needs time to evolve is sickening.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351864
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    ??????????
    To suggest that there was nothing to offer because of a well heeled banter?

    And just who did I offend? You. With a remark about fatigue life. In an aircraft forum……

    If you cannot respond to that then I am sorry. For your stress levels.

    You made an offensive and insulting remark directed toward me.

    in reply to: Sharia Law in the UK #1917021
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    ??????????
    To suggest that there was nothing to offer because of a well heeled banter?

    And just who did I offend? You. With a remark about fatigue life. In an aircraft forum……

    If you cannot respond to that then I am sorry. For your stress levels.

    You made an offensive and insulting remark directed toward me.

    in reply to: General Discussion #351866
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    In sustainability terms there is a world of difference between the life-cycles of say, the Blue Whale and the Atlantic Cod.

    There used to be something like 200,000 to 300,000 Blue Whales in the Antarctic there are now estimated to be 5000 – 12,000 in all the oceans of the world. When commercial whaling of Blue Whale was banned in 1966 they were on the brink of extinction and over the last forty odd years it is unclear if the world population has increased significantly or even remained stable.

    Blue Whales are mammals, and as mammals they take a long time to reach sexual maturity, typically five to ten years, they breed slowly with a female only having a single calf (sometimes two) every two or three years and that calf is dependant on its mother for the first year of its life. It is estimated that they can live for eighty years (nobody is sure but the oldest known with any certainty is thirty-five).

    It is possible for Atlantic Cod to recover much more quickly from commercial fishing however due to over-fishing many populations are close to collapse and it is possible that a change in the balance of their specific eco-system may have occurred that will prevent stocks ever recovering even if all commercial fishing was suspended indefinitely.

    Man…..the hunter. :rolleyes:

    So?

    Just means you hunt less whales.

    in reply to: Japan killing whales for research???? #1917027
    sealordlawrence
    Participant

    In sustainability terms there is a world of difference between the life-cycles of say, the Blue Whale and the Atlantic Cod.

    There used to be something like 200,000 to 300,000 Blue Whales in the Antarctic there are now estimated to be 5000 – 12,000 in all the oceans of the world. When commercial whaling of Blue Whale was banned in 1966 they were on the brink of extinction and over the last forty odd years it is unclear if the world population has increased significantly or even remained stable.

    Blue Whales are mammals, and as mammals they take a long time to reach sexual maturity, typically five to ten years, they breed slowly with a female only having a single calf (sometimes two) every two or three years and that calf is dependant on its mother for the first year of its life. It is estimated that they can live for eighty years (nobody is sure but the oldest known with any certainty is thirty-five).

    It is possible for Atlantic Cod to recover much more quickly from commercial fishing however due to over-fishing many populations are close to collapse and it is possible that a change in the balance of their specific eco-system may have occurred that will prevent stocks ever recovering even if all commercial fishing was suspended indefinitely.

    Man…..the hunter. :rolleyes:

    So?

    Just means you hunt less whales.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,486 through 1,500 (of 5,730 total)