Gee, is the US getting anything from the Raptor program apart from the plane itself…gee like technology development, perhaps?
If pure cost is all that one goes by…your words…then the Raptor is a “fiasco” as well, the fact that the US is prepared to pay for such capability is besides the point.. :rolleyes:
The MKI includes a deep license for the entire aircraft and most importantly the AL-31FP turbofans. The timeline has been compressed to its present one. Obviously the cost calculations will change, calling it a fiasco purely based on cost grounds, when it is still value for money is as pointless as calling many other programs worldwide, which have also faced substantial time and cost overruns fiascos purely on those grounds…which includes many American programs giving the US capability which they were prepared to pay for and wait for.
The CAG report has been qouted by numerous news agencys, it was presented to the Indian parliament yet still you cant except it- you realy are pathetic.
Better engines and CFT are just proposals at the moment. Though the JSF is nowhere near complete too.
And the significantly smaller RCS will grow significantly once you load the EF with A/G stores and external fuel.
So does every other aircraft with the excpetion of the JSF, whats your point? Suggesting that the RAF should aquire the B2 or something?
You are quite amusing. Where have these recent requests come from but your vivid imagination? If anything, LM is peddling the F-16 as the basis for which a JSF could be ordered. India has made no official requests for the JSF, bar a cursory statement from the Navy that the JSF is a better candidate for their needs than the F/A-18.
As regards the Russians, funny that even today, the MiG-35 is being offered with a more comprehensive technology package than even the MKI was. And that the F-16 I offer seems exactly built to push the F-16 without running into USG hurdles of TOT, even though it does seem doomed (the F-16 was never a frontrunner).
Actually you are the one who is amusing, I see you still havnt managed to find an official denial for the widely reported CAG report :rolleyes: . The F-16I offer is an unconfirmed report from an Israeli news paper, most other sources suggest that the F-16E/F will be offered, this makes more sense seeing as India has all but demanded an AESA radar. Of course the Mig-35 is being offered with a comprehensive ToT package, Russian companys, Mig in particular are desperate for sales, it looks as if Mig wont be going much longer without the MRCA deal, its just the same as the MKI deal. :rolleyes:
What makes you say that?
Good question. With all the planned weapons intergration for the Typhoon and some of the extra goodies suggested for Tranche-3 (such as better engines and Conformal Fuel Tanks) the Typhoon should be as capable as the Tornadoe, and thats not even mentioning the significantly smaller RCS.
The NH-90 doesn’t fit comforably into the helicopter market. In reality, the AB-139 is far closer in capabilty to the NH-90 than most would believe. It is also cheaper by a factor of five!
Like so many European collaborative programs, the NH-90 has suffered from long time scales – so much so, that off the self solutions are far cheaper and more satisfactory.
In any event, the UK has done well to purchase more Lynx helicopters. Of course, for other users the AB-139 (or S-70) might make even more sense…..
How exactly has the UK done well when these choppers wont be in service for another ten years and yet they were needed at least 3 years a go if not more (as was pointed out by a parliamentary select committee). At the same time they could have just ordered more merlins (it has proved to be a popular bird with the army in particular) on a faster delivery scale.
Is that why the US is thinking of caving in and allowing the UK to do what they wish?
The UK and the US have been very close allies since before the UK gave up owning India, the US gave that country Trident and Tomahawk. Now look at the fight the UK had to get to the situation you mentione.
Pershing II had about three times the range and was FAR more accurate than Pershing IA. The only thing they had in common was the name and the launcher. Keep in mind not only was the RV terminally guided but it could execute preprogrammed manuevers to make any attempt at interception quesitonable. Time of flight was well inside their decision making process. Pershing II could take out Moscow from Germany. Pershing IA couldn’t reach it. In a first strike against the USSR Pershing IIs would have been leading the way for a decapitation strike against Moscow.
It should also be remembered that by this time the Soviet Union was in economic melt-down and the Gorbachev regime was trying to reduce defence spending as far as possible wothout loosing face, in many ways the strategic and military requirements were less important.
The Tornadoe replacement will most likely consist of a mixture of JSF’s and Typhoons. Basically expect the current inventory of Strike aircraft and fighters to be entirely replaced with JSF and Tryphoon. The Tornado realy has to go soon as the airframs are rapidly running out of hours, it is possible that a further upgrade will have to be undertaken just to get them to 2020. The Harrier is a nice aircraft bu the JSF is a quantum leap over it. Although personally I think it is ridiculous getting the V/STOL version to operate from runways and 50,000 ton aircraft carriers but then common sense never was in abundance at the MoD.
Cool. That means the Chicoms will have a knockoff of the JSF soon after that.
What a realy usefull educated comment. :rolleyes:
The designation of the AEW aircraft that crashed was KJ-200 (Shaanxi Y-8F-600) not KJ-2000 (IL-76). Kindly refrain from posting false reports.
Not only is this a false report but there was also no need for a new thread considering the vibrant nature of the already existing chinese military aviation thread.
This is pathetic, these choppers were needed in service years ago. The very fact that this is happening now when any number of helicopters could have been ordered of the shelf (the already in service Merlin for instance) years ago and delivered by now. Instead due to the unparelleled stupidity and waste which is endemic within the UK government results in this, another programme which is years later than required and a comprimise with what was initially intended. This is not something to celebrate rather another damning indictment of the incompetance of the UK MoD.
That’s cetainly true, I was just emphasizing that given previous success in this area, it’s not outside the realm of posibility for something like this to be fielded in the future. It may have been intended for use on the Su-35, who knows.
The Su-35BM will supposedly have a rearward facing radar, two have been mentioned as likely-the Phazotron Kopyo MF and the NIIP Osa. But with everything russian related we will just have to wait and see.
Inevitably the US will want to know what THEY get out of the deal. Somehow I don’t think they’ll feel “you tell us how to make everything so we don’t have to buy anymore planes from you and oh we’ll use that info to compete AGAINST you” is going to be very tempting :rolleyes:
Very true. Russia handed over the MKI tech becouse they were desperate for money and orders, the US on the other hand can afford to tell India where to get off and based on the way recent requests for tech transfer have gone (read JSF) i think it is quite likely. 😉
I’ve often thought if you put something like SICBM on an 18-wheeler disguised as a Smith’s truck or some other large company and just let them lose on the US highway system you’d NEVER track those suckers down. Have the stabilizers and launch system inside the area formed by the trailer and you should be able to make it indistinguishable from the real thing.
If the chinese just painyed some of these up like tankers it would make intels life alot harder.
but indian mki have it
No they dont.